The Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) began with a ceremony, a show of patriotism, and some trolling.
First came a welcome to country ceremony, followed by an acoustic performance of “We Are Australian”. Country Liberal Party Senator and rising star Jacinta Price then gave the opening address.
“First, I’d like to pay my respects to…” she began, pausing for effect, “…every proud Australian!”
After being on hiatus for COVID-19, CPAC Australia came at a crucial time for conservative politics in Australia. The federal Coalition was shellacked at the last election after nearly a decade in power, and now just two states are led by right-wing premiers — both of whom have led moderate governments.
I was among 1000 attendees who made their way to the ICC in Sydney to hear from a mix of Australian right-wing politicians and commentators and a few headline international names like Nigel Farage, former Trump adviser Jason Miller, and former Trump acting attorney-general Matt Whitaker.
What the audience heard over the weekend, the speakers promised, was the way out of the wilderness for the conservative political movement. Speakers listed their many enemies — most common were climate scientists, indoctrinating teachers, unelected bureaucrats, Dictator Dan, and the radical and woke left — but one group earned more opprobrium from the crowd than almost any other: “conservative cowards”, said Farage.
I saw some attendees and speakers clearly thought some of them were inside the room. Through the weekend, a sense of conflict and contradiction bubbled barely below the surface, only to erupt towards the end.
When I walked into the conference on Saturday morning, I noticed a heavy police presence around the ICC’s entrances. The centre’s staff — masked — checked my ticket at the doors before I went up to the CPAC registration where my ticket was checked again. They gave me a tote bag, which included a copy of the far-right conspiracy-promoting newspaper The Epoch Times, The Spectator and a flyer advertising Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) memberships for “only” $99.
I was running a few minutes late and the conference had just started so the conference lobby was mostly empty, barring a cardboard cut-out of Donald Trump. I hurried into the back of the full auditorium as the welcome to country was happening. The front section was roped off for golden-ticket holders (“only $479 for members”). I was in the back with everyone else. The audience appeared to be, for the most part, older, white and fully engrossed in Price’s speech.
The Voice to Parliament was the major target of the weekend. Much of the first day was dedicated to the case against it. Price promised that constitutionally enshrining an Indigenous advisory body would create “racial separatism”. Former prime minister Tony Abbott said a Voice wasn’t necessary because of existing Indigenous federal politicians and would be “discrimination”. Even international speakers weighed in. Whitaker warned against altering Australia’s constitution, citing America’s near-religious obsession with its own founding document.
The rest of the conference’s Australian speakers focused on the other ideological battlegrounds. The IPA’s Bella d’Abrera declared students were being “indoctrinated” by a national curriculum including criticism of Australia’s colonial history as well as sex and gender education. Professor Ian Plimer (falsely) claimed that no one had ever proven that humankind’s carbon emissions have contributed to climate change. One Nation’s Mark Latham declared that long COVID wasn’t a disease — despite huge amounts of research showing its biological impact — but a “mental state” caused by watching the mainstream media.
References to somewhat obscure right-wing memes regarding the likes of Bruce Pascoe’s Dark Emu, Labor’s promise of a $275 power bill reduction, and eating bugs all landed with the audience without much explanation. Similarly, the audience seemed to get references to US politics, including boos for Democrats like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and even Republican Liz Cheney.
During the breaks, we filtered back into the lobby. Attendees who’d bought general tickets stood around in the mostly empty room while the golden-ticket holders went to the “golden-ticket room” where there were chairs, tables and refreshments. There were huge queues for the general bathrooms, but I was able to skip the line by using a gender-neutral toilet ignored by everyone else.
I spoke to some other attendees over the weekend. Sheree told me she didn’t like some of the more “extreme” parts of the conference but was worried about gender and environmental policies. Duncan told me he flew from Tasmania to see Zuby, a speaker billed as a “popular rapper” who gave a TED Talk-style speech based on a Twitter thread he wrote that went viral. After Zuby’s session, I overheard an elderly man say: “I was expecting him to do a rap dance.”
A major theme of the weekend was how conservatives were demonised for their views. Many of the speakers talked about how they would be criticised or attacked for what they said.
“It’s obvious from looking at us that CPAC is a racist organisation,” joked its Australia chairman and Indigenous man Warren Mundine during a panel of Indigenous speakers.
“They want to call us anti-Semitic … or white nationalists,” said CPAC USA chairman and former White House political director Matt Schlapp when talking about other CPAC conferences in Israel and Japan.
“Opposing a Voice to Parliament doesn’t make you anti-Aboriginal,” Abbott quipped.
Much of the conference was defined by jabs at their political opposition. Multiple speakers mocked the idea of acknowledgments of country and using gender pronouns. There was not a hint of irony as Schlapp, shortly before talking about the different CPAC conferences around the world, spoke about his fear of the left’s “well-funded global movement”.
Speakers also shared anecdotes about their perceived run-ins with censorship and cancel culture. Abbott shared a story about how he was invited to officially open facilities at a primary school when he was prime minister. He was invited to tour the school afterwards and made his way into a Year 6 classroom where they were learning about how pollution caused climate change. When Abbott began to interrogate the 11- and 12-year-olds about whether they knew about the Ice Age and natural fluctuations in the world’s climate, he was, by his telling, hurried out of the room by the teacher.
Later in the conference, Ukrainian think tank director Nataliya Melnyk spoke about her country’s battle for survival against Russia and the death of some of her friends in the war. (Almost simultaneously, Schlapp had to apologise for CPAC tweeting a message that criticised the US for “gift-giving to Ukraine”, featured a Russian flag, and used Putin-esque rhetoric by calling it “Ukraine occupied territories”.)
Even as the conference attempted to present a buttoned-up, polished image of the movement, there were times when CPAC flirted with the fringe. Topher Field, director of the anti-lockdown documentary Battleground Melbourne, led a multimedia session featuring three Victorians who spoke about how Daniel Andrews’ COVID-19 restrictions had hurt them. The carefully choreographed performance — complete with lighting cues and dramatic orchestral background music — omitted the histories of their speakers.
One speaker, Matt Lawson, is an anti-5G conspiracy theorist who hand-delivered pamphlets with vaccine misinformation to aged care facilities during the 2021 lockdown. Another, Carly Soderstrom, spoke about how she went viral during the pandemic for videos blaming lockdowns for pushing her into bankruptcy. She reportedly lied about using GoFundMe proceeds raised for COVID-19 relief to pay back debts accrued before the pandemic. The session also featured footage and reference to Monica Smit, the founder of Australia’s biggest anti-vaccine group Reignite Democracy Australia. The session was given a standing ovation.
It wasn’t until one of the last sessions of CPAC that Peter Dutton was mentioned.
“Where is Peter Dutton?” asked One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts. During his noticeably short speaking slot, the Queensland senator took aim at the conservative party leader’s absence, the Coalition and the conference itself, which he derisively called “LPAC” (the “L” standing for Liberal Party).
It was enough to light a fire in the crowd. The subsequent session, titled “The Road Back of the Coalition”, kicked off with boos after former senator Amanda Stoker, one of the panellists, said: “Wouldn’t it be good if we spent a bit of time kicking the other side and not our own side?”
This soon grew into a full shouting match between the audience and former Liberal federal MP Nick Minchin. People in the audience began heckling when Minchin said: “I don’t know that the Liberal Party needs a whole lot of changing,” telling him that the party had sold out.
In response, Minchin said they were “worse than a socialist audience” and accused one man, who began walking towards the stage while shouting, of being a “leftie” — earning an even angrier reaction from the audience. The host was eventually able to soothe the audience by guiding the conversation back to common ground: opposing lockdowns.
Throughout the weekend, speakers like Farage declared the need to elect strong, conservative leaders and criticised the Coalition for failing to do so. Liberal leaders like Malcolm Turnbull and Scott Morrison were unpopular with both speakers and the audience.
I didn’t attend the Saturday night gala, but footage shared online afterwards by Craig Kelly showed that NSW Liberal Treasurer Matt Kean won a “boo-off”, and he received the angriest reaction from the audience when mentioned during the conference.
Even Liberal Party politicians who were or would have been celebrated by the party’s base just a few years ago were received coolly by the audience. A recorded address from former prime minister John Howard, which made the case for the Liberal Party’s embrace of both conservatism and liberalism, received a tepid response. The audience was significantly less interested in Stoker — who was selected to speak at multiple panels and was mentioned as a “future prime minister” by Liberal Party vice-president Teena McQueen — than it was in Latham or Roberts.
The feeling is mutual, at least for some. On the first day, near a protest against the conference, an attendee wearing a “Conspiracy Dundee” costume and another holding a “Make Australia Great Again” flag posed for photos. “Say ‘feral’,” the costumed man said. Nearby, I overheard a person wearing a CPAC gold-ticket lanyard saying: “Unfortunately the Crocodile Dundee guy is with us.”
The last major speaker, Alan Jones, was met with rapturous applause. I left the speech as the broadcaster began to lash Liberal governments for profligate spending to do a television interview about the conference. Someone from CPAC came over to speak to the camera crew while they were setting up with an offer of a “spicy” interview with Roberts or another speaker.
When the camera operators looked at each other and shook their heads, the man’s face fell and he strode off.
An awful bunch of desperate people reassuring each other that the rest of the Australian population are desperate people for wanting an improvement in Government.
Gee, it would be good if one day one of these luminaries who thought they were still significant said something positive instead of just searching around for things to cut down.
It seems though that even within their own Echo Chamber they can’t agree.
Because they know that positivity does not cut through or influence voters, but negativity does.
I like the way the anti-elitists had a special refreshments room for the elite participants/guests/invitees/attendees.
Well played Cam.
The only reason a gender-neutral toilet existed at this conference was to get fingerprints and DNA samples of anyone using it. Be on your guard, Wilson.
I do the same with the disabled toilet.
That’s a bit low tho. I am disabled and can only use those loos, and to find it locked, and then watch and able bodied person emerge is a pretty disheartening sight.
Like tradies’ utes parked in Disabled spots – proof that many people are selfish a/holes.
My flatmate parked her car in the disabled spot with appropriate sticker. Got text from manager telling me to shift car as it was car washing day and the disabled spot was required.
In a previous life the trick was paper stickers with impossible glue to remove stuck on non disabled car doors pointing out they were in a disabled spot.
It would be better stuck on the windscreen, perhaps the middle to allow them to drive, very carefully, home before considering their actions.
My partner reported this example to the local Council once after she couldn’t park in one of the two a disabled spots (she had a sticker allowing her to park there) to get her elderly mum out to the shop. She saw the tradie concerned coming back from buying his chips etc, and then pointed out his “error” to which she copped a mouthful of abuse. Having already taken a photo of his ute and the signage and his lack of a permit on his dashboard she sent it to on the local Council. The Council sent a rep around to her house, and she signed a stat dec. and agreed to go to court if needed. That wasn’t necessary and he was fined in excess of $500 (with no appeal provision).
You can tell a person’s disability status just by looking at them?
If there is no-one waiting at the disabled toilet then I don’t see why it shouldn’t be used if there are queues for the others. If a disabled person was using it, then the next disabled person would have to wait until they were finished. A disabled toilet does not come with a guarantee it will be empty. Provided an able-bodied person doesn’t push in and the disabled person gets next go, I reckon it’s OK.
COMPLETELY agree! Equality in action.
I’ve lost count of the number of times it ‘hasn’t’ been ‘OK’ in practice, though.
A disabled parking spot or loo left ‘empty’ – like rarely-used ramps, lifts, braille signs, hearing loops – is also a collectively-embraced, standing civic acknowledgment, on the part of us able-bodied, of applied inclusiveness and normalisation in the public sphere. Not just a pragmatic concession to the often time-contingent realities of colostomy bags, clinical incontinences, heightened psycho-emotional toileting, privacy, dignity and personal space needs, and so on. For Carers who often have to help manage such realities, as much as for those who have to live with them.
Please: Don’t use these designated, needs-exclusive facilities unless you genuinely need to. (I know plenty who are perfectly entitled to but choose not to, when they don’t.) And…maybe stop seeing the world in relentlessly utilitarian terms. Chrs.
For the cognitively, not to say, ethically challenged try a different analogy – a library is where those seeking information find books, (aka solar powered, portable, random access, data storage units) not because they are constantly used but because there is a need, sometimes.
Perhaps not by one so important as you, who clearly consider yourself already full to the brim with prescient wisdom but, what’s the word…?, Others – assuming that you allow their existence in your world – People.
Unfortunately, even that analogy is now obsolete.
The criteria of the modern library now is to shed “unnecessary” (sic!) books that have not been borrowed in the last year – I guess that’s why the Library of Alexandria was thought to be surplus to requirements.
We live in a hyper-narcissistic world and age, alas.
You mean the disabled toilet?
The author is clearly disabled, if not physically, as he claims (to believe) that men can give birth.
Bearing such a burden means that he is clearly deserving of special privileges & consideration.
Perhaps the author identifies as disabled. They don’t say, probably so as not to get special treatment.
I continue to identify as a homo sapien, at least until my taxonomic reclassification is accepted. Looking forward to identifying as the first legal unhuman on this dust ball that we identify as a planet.
Did Cam not have a shower in the motel?
Why did s/he/they need to go to a ”bathroom”?
tsk – the kids today – he should’ve typed “dunny”
Fully Americanised?
Well done, Cam Wilson. You’re brave 1. For attending 2. For using the gender-neutral bathroom in such a prejudiced environment. Thanks for your summary, backstories and perspectives. Horrific that such destructive ideology is celebrated, including by former PMs, and that Teena McQueen remains deputy leader of the Liberal Party says a lot; I recall being aghast hearing her loudly and proudly praise donald trump on QandA a few years ago. If only more Australian eyes and ears were open to see with whom some of their ‘leaders’ cavort!
Re- Abbott on the Ice Ages… Apologists for fossil fuels argue that Nature is mightier than man, so the inevitable approach of the next Ice Age will restore any accidental damage to the climate. Wrong! The gentle Milankovic forces were just strong enough to nudge the otherwise undisturbed carbon cycle, causing the now-familiar cycles of the past Ice Ages. The “hockey stick” graph of temperatures across the last thousand years does show global temperature slowly creeping down towards what have been the next Ice Age. However it was disrupted in the late 1800s by the much stronger force of anthropogenic carbon dioxide entering the greenhouse, an effect that has become more emphatic ever since. We must remind the apologists too, that that extra carbon is up there for hundreds of thousands of years, longer than the Ice Age cycle of the past. The Ice Ages have been cancelled!
This is one of Randall Munro’s better infographs, IMO: https://xkcd.com/1732/ “Earth Temperature Timeline”. Only covers the period since the last ice age glaciation.
Tony is a Stone Age Man – and his Club is for Men Only.
Possibly even earlier given that strange gait and lip licking, somewhat akin to a goanna.
Possible caused by to many blows to the head as a pugilist, with the hindbrain, the lizard brain, taking over?
In the face of the evidence, what is the explanation for anthropogenic global warming denialists? That Abbott can still bring himself to trot out that lazy, tired ‘there were ice ages’ stuff says a lot about the way he thinks, if you can call it that. His chosen opinions are so rigid they prevent any actual information from penetrating. But on top of that, the arrogance and irresponsibility that has him hawk this rubbish to school children is disgraceful.
Climate scientists continue to fail to explain that CO2 absorbs heat in the infra red part of the spectrum. Specifically around 15 microns. More CO2, more heat absorption. It’s that simple.
Search: CO2 absorbs heat at what part of EMR spectrum
Do climate scientists really have to explain what everyone should know from their basic Physical chemistry?