The federal government has announced it will halve the number of Medicare-funded psychology sessions available to Australians, cutting the temporary additional 10 sessions offered during the pandemic.
The decision, announced by Health Minister Mark Butler yesterday, is based on an independent evaluation of the Better Access initiative. But the report makes no mention of cutting the extra sessions, due to expire on December 31. Instead it found they “should continue to be made available and should be targeted towards those with more complex mental health needs”.
The report also found people on the lowest incomes were least likely to access services and had to wait on average 17 days for a session — five days more than those in the highest income quintile. Two in three people also had to pay a gap fee.
Butler argued that cutting the additional sessions would help address inequitable access — without specifying how — and said the government would instead focus on other recommendations by strengthening the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) to facilitate family and carer involvement in treatment and by funding mental health case conferencing.
Better Access treatment services cost $827 million in 2021, equating to $618 a person treated and $31 per capita, the report found. During 2019-20, $11 billion was spent on mental health-related services. The national study of mental health and well-being found in 2020-21 that two in five Australians had experienced a mental disorder at some time, and one in five developed a mental disorder that lasted for at least 12 months.
Investing in preventive mental health has a considerable return on investment. One 2018 study by KPMG and Mental Health Australia estimated preventive or early intervention for 50,000 children or young people who had started to develop anxiety or depression would deliver $200 million in long-term benefits — a return on investment of $7.90 for every $1 spent.
It found cognitive behavioural therapy for children whose parents have a depressive disorder or for those experiencing symptoms of a depressive disorder are highly effective at preventing symptoms.
A report from the Mental Health Commission, also released in 2018, found face-to-face psychological workplace interventions for depression prevention could save $45.8 million across 11 years, and similar interventions to prevent post-natal depression could save $23.3 million across five years.
University of Melbourne professor emeritus at the school of population and health Anthony Jorm said Australia’s mental health support system was a balancing act between the number of sessions people needed to get benefits and the number of people who could access those sessions.
“If you look at expert consensus and clinical practice guidelines, it’s more sessions rather than fewer to get optimal results,” he said.
But finding a psychologist can be tough. Australia is meeting just 35% of its psychology workforce target, which is the largest shortfall of any mental health profession, according to the Australian Psychological Society.
Jorm said Australia needed to treat mental health more holistically, arguing mental health care should be better incorporated into the government’s “well-being budget”, with a separate budget analysis document assessing how policies affected people’s mental health, ranging from income to secure housing.
“We need to be measuring mental health regularly and relating all government policies to that because everything across the whole government potentially has an implication for mental health problems,” he said.
“We have a very one-sided approach in Australia to mental health. We put our eggs overwhelmingly in the treatment basket and very little in prevention when we need both.”
Should the federal government reverse this decision? Let us know by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.
A good, Right-thinking government can’t waste money on troubled peasants when there are fossil fuel companies needing billions of dollars in compensation for when their outrageous profits dip slightly in value.
Just so. Thanks be that at least somebody is thinking about the billionaire corporations and how to protect them! Not that they are sounding all that grateful, of course. And, as Rundle’s article today eloquently explains, this is what passes for political genius in these times, when a good wedge is the whole point and a good policy is a distant fantasy.
having witnessed the struggles of a dear friend who found they were married to a vicious narcissist, and then had try to find a shrink to help them navigate the trauma and try to rebuild their life while trying to extricate themselves from the toxic relationship – I can say there are not enough mental health professionals, and that that access to those that exist is far too limited and expensive
Agree with everything you say. However, the fact is that we have nowhere near enough mental health professionals- psychologists, psychiatrists or counselors. i think the government has been forced to decide whether it is better to enable more people to access 10 sessions than to allow some to access 20 sessions. Bearing in mind that for people in regional areas the only sessions available will be through telehealth if that is available, and if all those sessions are already booked out they have absolutely nowhere else to go. And another fact – the suicide rate among men living in rural areas is higher than in metropolitan areas.
The question is, How do we fund this and everything else, when everyone wants to know how big their tax cut is going to be?
10 is fine, this will allow more to be included, Assess later when more have been able to participate.
Absolutely right on , Moggy…and mary wood above…Minister Butler and the government are making an attempt to provide mental health services to as many people as possible, given the ‘actual’ number of professionals available to administer those services is severely limited. So it doesn’t really matter how much money you daft people think the government is spending on fossil fuel companies, because we just can’t manufacture adequate health service people like yesterday!
Unless, of course, you think its okay to have the top end of society catered for, with their 20 free visits per year, whilst those at the bottom miss out entirely? Should we have more mental health services? Of course, but that is going to take time, planning and money…NONE of which the government has denied.
Get over yourselves!!
Nine years of looking and thinking and planning for retirement, whilst doing nothing at all.
How is ten fine? Do you have solid evidence for your “clinical judgement” of all people suffering any of the many mental illnesses?
Halving the number of visits will in affect double the of individuals access to help.
Access to help is one thing. Effective treatment is quite another.
If the problem can’t be assessed in 10 visits, we do have a problem.
Not according to the evidence:
https://theconversation.com/seeing-a-psychologist-on-medicare-soon-youll-be-back-to-10-sessions-but-we-know-thats-not-often-enough-194338
Returning the plan back to the original plan of 10 allows more access to more people.
The ALPs transition to conservatism continues at pace. Next we will be told all government services are on hold till we balance the budget.
No, the ALP continues to be the party we put in when everything has turned to chocolate, warm, very smelly and up to our necks in the debt which has bought many, a nice place down by the beach or a new career.
I suspect that the ALP needs to find more money to fund the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
Actually I think this misrepresents the report seriously. Based on my understanding the concern was that giving treatment to a greater number of people was preferred whereas many were not able to access it at all. There also seemed to be a much greater uptake in more affluent areas, where the need is likely least. I think the government has not got the process right, but I also know there are many people who cannot get the 20 sessions beause there are no services where they live.