Writing Crikey’s annual politicians of the year is usually relatively easy once every three years: it’s hard to avoid handing it to whoever won the federal election that year, although in 2016 I gave it to Pauline Hanson who, like a cancer we thought we’d beaten, once again defiled the body politic, and metastasises to this day. Crikey readers were outraged, believing the nomination of the most effective politician should be the one they like the most.
No such luck this year. How can it not be Anthony Albanese, who developed a plan to beat Scott Morrison, stuck to it when progressives were angrily demanding he start throwing the toys out of the cot, and won government?
Albanese was patient, backed his political judgment, used the Rudd formula of keeping a small-target strategy where he didn’t want a fight and going large where he did want one, and when he stumbled, he admitted it, took guard again and waited for the next delivery. It’s hard for Labor to win elections from opposition in Australia against News Corp and a generally hostile media, which is why it happens so rarely, but now Albanese’s name’s on the list.
That wouldn’t have counted for much if his prime ministership had started badly, but he cruised into office and kept his momentum going, looking more and more comfortable as he began delivering on his agenda with major legislation and a faultless performance internationally, backed a by a strong team that, Richard Marles apart, so far looks competent and productive.
That so many of them already have substantial ministerial experience (and Jim Chalmers was in the thick of it with Wayne Swan from 2007-13) has helped with the sense of adults in the room, but Albanese has come to power with more than a quarter of a century in Parliament. No wonder he knows the virtues of patience.
Honourable mentions
In a disastrous year for the Liberals, Tasmanian Bridget Archer was one of the few Liberals to get a 2PP swing toward her in Bass, and deservedly so. Archer not merely joined other moderate MPs in voting against Morrison’s disastrous religious discrimination bill early in the year but bravely flew solo in backing Helen Haines’ bill for a national integrity commission in late 2021.
Since the election she has again defied her party by backing Labor’s stronger emissions reduction target, and supporting the censure of Morrison, the man who had bullied her after she had crossed the floor in 2021. The party may talk about being a broad church and supporting the right of MPs to cross the floor, but the reality is quite different. Archer has guts, something noticeably lacking in the Liberal Party of recent years.
2021’s Politician of the Year, NSW Treasurer Matt Kean, had another excellent year. You’ll have to look long and hard to find a budget as good as the one he unveiled in June. One of Australia’s historic economic documents, it centred the economic trajectory of Australia’s largest state firmly around women, while initiating important tax reform and maintaining fiscal discipline and Kean’s signature commitment to decarbonisation.
In an era when we reflexively bemoan the quality of our politicians, Kean continued to show public office could be used effectively and productively. And he did so in a way that was completely consistent with his own party’s history — a lesson many other Liberals in Canberra and in other states would do well to heed.
Love him or hate him — he seems to inspire only those two emotions — Dan Andrews scored a remarkable victory in the November election. While he benefited from a truly awful Victorian Liberal Party, to rack up two landslide wins elevates Andrews to the esteemed company of Labor deities like Neville Wran and Bob Hawke.
Yes, there continue to be significant questions about the integrity of his government — but Victorians didn’t exactly go to the polls without extensive media coverage (including from Crikey) of literally every stumble that Andrews had made during the past four years. It didn’t make a shred of difference.
Dishonourable mentions
Well, there’s only one, isn’t there? We’ve expended enough words on him this year even though he hasn’t been prime minister since May. Let’s not waste more of them on the man who effortlessly supplanted Tony Abbott as Australia’s worst-ever leader.
Who would you have chosen? Have we missed any? Let us know by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.
Sheesh, even Crikey persists with the unfounded ‘love-hate’ Dan Andrews narrative. This contrivance was utterly dispelled at the November election. Why do many in the media continue to inhabit some weird self-perpetuating echo chamber?
Yeah, I’m pretty torn – on one hand he won’t stop logging of old growth forests, which I just about reckon is worth assassination at this stage, but on the other, he busted out the biggest turnaround against neoliberalism in my lifetime with his promise to bring back the SEC.
It’s not love OR hate; it’s love AND hate.
I’m guessing it would be suicidal for any ALP leader to earn the wrath of the CFMEU (many loggers I think). But he did (from memory) promise to halt all old growth logging by 2030. So maybe he has a plan (and if we’re lucky, it may happen sooner).
That’s a general problem with the ALP. No matter how good their leaders, they are still beholden to vested interests within the Union movement.Sometimes these “interests” are good for a small minority, but do harm to everyone else.
Not everywhere. In the Deep West the vested interests McGowan is beholden to are Stokes and the miners.
They’re not as beholden to unions as the LNP is to big business and the Murdoch press
I agree with your picks Bernard. Anthony has done remarkably well as PM. He has the huge advantage of having an extremely capable executive team. They are all out on their front foot prosecuting responsibly the issue of the day and managing the portfolios with competence. It surely is a breath of fresh air. Calm and excited were the words I chose in a recent discussion on how I was feeling in regard to this Albanese Labor government.
Bridget Archer is the only Coalition politician who can hold their head high. The “leftovers” (curtesy of Jim Chalmers) combined have little to no integrity whatsoever.
…. Anthony has done remarkably well as PM. He has the huge advantage of having an extremely capable executive team.
The changes in seven months are something to be hugely thankful for.
A mark of a capable government. Competent ministers and trust in them to do their jobs, unlike the adman who hid his ministers (for sound reasons).
Given how the freshman senator David Pocock has handled the job of brokering the balance of power while keeping true to what he was elected on, I’d say he deserves an honourable mention. (Maybe a rookie of the year?)
Agreed. More like him needed.
Okay I’ll say it first, what is the dig about Richard Marles all about? Did BK not receive a Christmas card from him this year?
And I’ll second that! There is no reason why Marles should not be included in the general commendation of the Labor team.
He thinks we are the 49 th state of the USA. I would prefer a defense policy, not be a part of the US attack policy. I am proudly independent Aussie not a US lackey.
No I don’t want to be bestie mates with the World’s biggest bully.
Maroochy, I don’t especially mean to be pedantic, but as you’ve made a point about being a proudly independent Aussie, I must tell you that you’ve spelled the word defence incorrectly. You have used the American spelling ‘defense’; in Australian English the word is spelled ‘defence’.
Marles needs to be a bit more circumspect in his blind support for AUKUS, and US warmongering in general.
The USA does not deserve much of our trust at all, an extremely dangerous and greedy, self-centred ally.
I agree in principle but I don’t think that is just an RM “problem”.
In a dangerous world the US is an ally worth having, so I do not agree with you in principle.
But can we be sure that the point you make is Bernard’s reason for withholding approbation from RM?
I’ll think you’ll find that the dominant partner in any alliance always is
Nuclear subs do not meet our needs but they appear to meet the needs of USA
Marked strikes me as being a bit of an unimaginative machine man. Not keen on his all the way with the US and attitude to China
Should be Marles not Marked.
Marles wouldn’t know if his ar*e was on fire, he’s useless
I’d quibble with the ‘love him or hate him’ label on Dan Andrews – I think there is a small but vocal minority who do a lot of hate – and their loud shouting makes everyone else look like they are all on board with the cult of Dan. I don’t think you could win a fourth term so crushly just off the back of your fan bois/girls, and the (for media) sad truth is probably there are quite a lot of Victorians who really just don’t mind him or his government that much but are just not as obsessed as the media. .
sorry – third term. Getting ahead of myself there……..
…I think there is a small but vocal minority who do a lot of hate…
And I think they got their reward. Remember how Frydenburg, a Victorian, continually dumped on Andrews during the pandemic and look what happened to him. And to the state Libs at the state election – despite the predictions of the know-nothing msm.