An independent assessment of NSW Labor’s election promise to raise public sector wages and pay for it with “productivity gains” has found the plan would cost $2.6 billion over three years.
The cost analysis from the Parliamentary Budget Office on Monday afternoon came just hours after Labor Leader Chris Minns guaranteed public sector workers would get a pay rise above 3.5% if his party won government on Saturday: “I can guarantee that as a result of the fact that we know that there’s budget savings and productivity gains with our strict economic rules in place.”
Minns had previously declined to say that wages would increase, even though a central part of his party’s platform is to scrap a cap on public sector wages imposed by the current government. As recently as last week he would only go so far as to say wage increases would be “negotiated” under a Labor government.
The PBO analysis looked at a “hypothetical example” of a one percentage point increase above the government’s wage growth targets of 4% for the next financial year, and 3.5% in the following years. It found a Labor government would have to identify “cumulative productivity savings of $2.6 billion over three years” to pay for the increase.
“It is not possible to give public sector workers a pay rise without it impacting the budget bottom line — the numbers simply don’t add up,” Treasurer Matt Kean said. “Chris Minns is either lying to workers or he’s lying to his union mates. The risk is clear that he could also be forced to either cut services or sack workers.”
In its analysis of the Coalition’s election promises, the PBO found that many big ticket items floated during the election had not been submitted for costing. Labor seized on that in reacting to the PBO release on Monday evening.
“Extraordinarily, there is no new money in the Liberals’ costings for the construction of the two metro projects it promised,” it said. “Nor is there money for Warragamba Dam wall raising. And the northern beaches link also remains unfunded.”
A Labor campaign spokesman said the party’s policy would not affect the budget position: “We’ve said from day one that we want to be responsible when it comes to essential services in NSW — and what we can pay our teachers, nurses, paramedics and cops will be based on the budget rules we have laid out.
“Any increase to wages will have to be paid for out of productivity gains and budget savings.
“There are independently costed policies on training, conditions and the wages cap — to keep our cops, teachers, paramedics and nurses here in NSW, not moving elsewhere. No other state has a wages cap in place in the entire country.”
The Coalition did not respond to follow-up questions from Crikey.
Other parts of the PBO analysis found Labor’s election promises would improve the net operating budget over the next four financial years by $1.4 billion, compared with a $97.2 million improvement over the same period under the Coalition plan, a $1.3 billion difference.
In another development, the PBO was forced to issue a correction to its Monday release because a “production error” had caused the first version to claim net borrowing would increase under the Labor plan, and decrease under the Coalition plan. The opposite was true.
The PBO told Crikey it issued its costings at 2.06pm, and discovered the error within one hour.
“We discovered the mistaken text within the hour, and corrected it in the versions published on the PBO website,” Parliamentary Budget Officer Stephen Bartos said.
The correction was issued at 3.52pm.
I thought the Coalition would give up on debt and deficit scar campaign after the disaster they left the Labor Party at a Federal level. They have no credibility left to shred on budget management.
They want to criticise a modest pay rise for essential workers? Really? This from the party that handed $33 billion to companies that made profits during the pandemic with no way of clawing any of it back?
What’s the economic boost of the wage increases to those who deserve and need it most? Greater than $2.6b over 3 yrs I reckon
Exactly!
Given that we public servants spend money here in the state, well the maths seem to add up to me.
Not another ‘debt and deficit’ disaster attempt from the Liberals? <sigh>
And how much would be gained in tax from those same pay increases? You don’t get one without the other.
Conservatives ignore that side of things because most of them are the kinds of people that avoid paying any tax at all.
Do the non economics types realise that fair wages by increasing outlays by the Minns policy might return NSW over five times that BACK, as money with likely velocity takes hold. We desperately need circulation and stimulus just as repressed wages need correcting.