ABC chair Ita Buttrose has issued a soft apology in a letter to the Australian Monarchist League (AML) for the broadcaster’s coverage of the coronation of King Charles III in May, after a backlash over including Indigenous perspectives on the effects of colonisation.
Condemnation of the broadcast, largely led by the AML and its chair, former senator Eric Abetz, resulted in “around” 1800 complaints, a Senate estimates hearing was told in late May. Of those, 59 raised issues related to editorial policies, which were referred to the ABC ombudsman’s office for investigation, and 1100 were deemed racist or abusive.
ABC ombudsman Fiona Cameron later cleared the coverage of any editorial breaches but conceded the segment may have been “jarring” for some viewers. In her letter to the AML earlier this month, Buttrose said there “are always lessons to be learnt” from covering significant events.
“I do acknowledge that there are members of our audience who sought to watch the ABC to view and focus on the live feed of the arrivals and were subsequently disappointed,” she wrote. “That appears to be the view of your organisation and those who are signatories to your petition. I am sorry they were disappointed with our coverage.”
The ABC declined a request for comment.
The coverage became the subject of a media storm driven by royalist criticism of the ABC’s panel coverage, which saw the AML launch a petition demanding the broadcaster apologise for its “biased” coverage and that “such hijacking” never happens again.
Abetz said the ABC’s apology was a “Clayton’s apology”, one you give when “you’re not really” apologising, before taking issue with the “stereotyping” of all monarchists as “conservatives”.
“Simply put, living in their bubble the ABC personnel just don’t understand their audience and have no idea how to respond when confronted by their audience’s criticism,” Abetz told Crikey.
The panel coverage, which was hosted by Jeremy Fernandez and Julia Baird, along with Q+A host Stan Grant, was a ratings killing for the ABC, with it beating all commercial competitors on total audience numbers, according to internal numbers seen by Crikey.
Indigenous writer and lawyer Teela Reid joined as a guest, alongside monarchist and Liberal Party backbencher Julian Leeser, as well as Craig Foster, co-chair of the Australian Republic Movement. The panel discussed the role of the monarchy in modern Australia and the consequences of colonialism for Indigenous peoples. It was broadcast for some 45 minutes before the ABC took the BBC’s live feed.
Grant, who became the target of media criticism and racism on social media, later announced that he would take leave from his role as host of Q+A. In a column, Grant said that since appearing on the coronation panel, he had seen “people in the media lie and distort” his words and had faced surging racial abuse on social media, directed at both him and his wife.
Shortly after Grant announced he’d step back, ABC News boss Justin Stevens released a statement urging critics to direct their complaints at him, not Grant.
“Over many months, but particularly in recent days, Stan Grant has been subject to grotesque racist abuse, including threats to his safety. This has become particularly virulent since he appeared as part of the ABC’s coronation coverage,” Stevens said.
Stevens said Grant was only one of a range of panellists and that he was “not the instigator” of the coverage. He had been asked to participate “as a Wiradjuri man to discuss his own family’s” lived experience.
“It is part of the ABC’s role to facilitate such important conversations, however confronting and uncomfortable, and to reflect the diversity of perspectives,” Stevens said.
Should Buttrose have apologised? Let us know by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clarity.
Just when I’d hoped to have seen the last of Eric Abetz, up he pops like the proverbial bad penny bristling with contrived outrage. That man’s head will explode when Australia finally becomes a republic. I for one, can’t wait.
Eric Abetz and the Deplorables. You have to laugh otherwise you would cry. Like a bunch of living fossils of an Australia that hardly was, interesting to point to for the education of the young, “this person was actually a senator…”
Cue also the people annoyed Ita apologised at all. I thought she struck the right “balance” and tongue was well in cheek.
Just don’t mention Uncle Otto.
Most of the likely Republic models would allow an Abetz, or a Rhinehart, or even a Meldrum to become whatever we learn to call the head of state. Anyway, Republic requires a change of constitution so guess what …
I would have said Colonel Klink is more like a turd you can’t flush. Be that as it may, who gives a flying you know what about what he thinks.
Ita Buttrose should have apologised for not giving Stan Grant the support he needed after being racially vilified. Monarchists are not owed an apology.
Ita Buttrose should also apologise for Bay of Fires
Cruel, but fair.
…and the Moderator killed my other comment. What was it, Crikey? Should I not have used the name Erica? Is that that not enough readers know what lèse-majesté is? Was it the recommendation that the Chaser’s dog be brought out? Your Moderator is soft, Crikey. Soft!
Just recently, and just a short distance from Zeehan (or should I say Mystery Bay), a middle-aged woman was plucked from a rainforest “crime-scene” by a squad of Tasmania’s finest (trousers at full mast) and hauled before a magistrate who dutifully sentenced her to 3 months in jail. This Thursday, a 78 year old gent will learn of his fate for a similar crime. Bob, I think his name is.
The locations are a mixture of Zeehan and Queenstown. Disappointig when it was touted as being shot on location as Queenstown.
I suppose Zeehan was put into the mix because there are more derelict and semi-derelict public buildings there.
Shame we don’t get to see the Queenstown PO or the Empire Hotel among others.
No matter what ABC coverage was, these people would have objected. They didn’t just object to King Charles not being a $5 note, they claimed it was a neo-communist plot
So Erica Betz is at the AML. Man that must be a scintilating place to be. Right up there with the Steamship Appreciation Society. May he continue his slide into oblivion. On the plus side he appears much less concerned with sex workers than his brother Peter in WA.
Anything Erica every did or say stopped being newsworthy many years ago. Having said that I wonder was it ever newsworthy?
Surely the bring back the Galleys society 🙂
Nothing wrong with a good steamship. Almost as good as a steam train.
Steamships are interesting mechanically and historically. I think Erica comes from the time when people believed in the possibility of a perpetual-motion machine, ignoring the laws of thermodynamics.
The AML has a tiny group of followers and an even tinier actual membership. Does Mr. Abetz really believe their interests take precedence over the views over the views of the great majority who agreed with and enjoyed that program ? And where is his belief in free speech ?
It’s only free speech when he’s the one doing the speaking.