A federal Indigenous agency set up by the Morrison government days after the 2019 election — and used to promote a Voice to Parliament before a spectacular backflip — has since given “PwC’s Indigenous Consulting” work worth more than $16 million.
Investigations show the little-known National Indigenous Australians Agency (NIAA) is the biggest federal funder of disgraced consultancy PwC’s “Indigenous” arm, known as PwC’s Indigenous Consulting — giving it 27 contracts totalling $16.3 million since the 2019 federal election.
It can also be revealed the NIAA is the first federal agency to give a contract to a PwC entity since a widely reported government “clampdown” over the PwC tax leak scandal in May.
On May 23 — four days after the “clampdown” — the NIAA gave PwC’s Indigenous Consulting a $745,292 contract for “strategic advice review services”, government filings show.
As revealed by The Klaxon last week, “PwC’s Indigenous Consulting” — which provides “advice to government” on “Indigenous matters” — is receiving millions of dollars a year in federal contracts.
By value, almost two-thirds of those contracts over the past four years have come from the NIAA — including a monster $10.2 million contract for “training and development services” in April last year, investigations show.
The NIAA was created on May 31 2019, a week after that year’s federal election, to ensure Indigenous Australians “have a say in the decisions that affect them”, with a “vision to ensure” Indigenous Australians “are heard, recognised and empowered”.
Days later its minister, then-Indigenous minister Ken Wyatt, told the National Press Club in Canberra “the Morrison government is committed to recognising Indigenous Australians in the constitution” and “working to achieve this through a process of true co-design”.
He confirmed all options in constructing a Voice to Parliament would be considered — specifically confirming the option of including a Voice to Parliament in the constitution.
Yet in a spectacular backflip just weeks later — reportedly following “backgrounding” of journalists by then-prime minister Scott Morrison’s office rebutting Wyatt — Wyatt then ruled it out.
“I want to be very clear — the question we put to the Australian people will not result in what some desire, and that is an enshrined Voice to Parliament,” Wyatt said.
There remains no constitutional Voice to Parliament — the Albanese government last week set October 14 for a national referendum on the matter.
Yet in the interim, “PwC’s Indigenous Consulting” — which provides “advice to government” and “aims to be an emblem for Indigenous self-determination” — has made millions.
Created in 2013 under then-PwC Australia CEO Luke Sayers, PwC’s Indigenous Consulting’s first recorded federal contract was in June 2015 from the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet for $185,555 for “specialist technical advice”.
Since then, contracts to PwC’s Indigenous Consulting have soared.
Filings with government register AusTender show it has been given $44.6 million in reportable federal government contracts — hitting a record of $13.7 million in 2022.
The more than 100 contracts and contract “amendments” (the price is almost always “amended” upwards) are from 19 federal departments and agencies.
They include $8.7 million in contracts from the Department of Education; $3.68 million from the Australian Taxation Office; $5.39 million from the Department of Social Services; $220,000 from Austrade; $510,953 from the Department of Infrastructure; and $1.16 million from the Department of Treasury.
As previously revealed, PwC’s Indigenous Consulting has been given dozens of “limited tender” contracts totalling $10.03 million on the grounds it is an “SME” (small-to-medium enterprise) with at least 50% Indigenous ownership.
The consultancy giant has said PwC’s Indigenous Consulting “is not part of PwC Australia” and “it is its own entity”.
Searches show PwC’s Indigenous consulting is 51% owned by a private company called MAAR Investment Holdings — and 49% by PwC Australia.
PwC has been caught selling confidential federal government data for millions of dollars to multinationals seeking to avoid Australian tax.
The consultancy gleaned the information while PwC partners — after signing confidentiality agreements — were providing “advice” to government on new laws to stop multinationals from avoiding Australian tax.
The federal government has come under extreme pressure over the PwC tax affair, including over a perceived failure to act.
On May 19, in what has been reported as an “effective ban” on PwC, the Department of Finance issued a new ”procurement policy note” to federal agencies.
It was to “remind” them they “must” consider the “performance history” of potential suppliers, including “any unethical behaviour” and any “failure of the tenderer to abide by substantive requirements such as confidentiality provisions”.
The NIAA told The Klaxon the $745,292 contract it had given to PwC’s Indigenous Consulting on May 23 was to “review” the “service delivery impacts” of some programs that had been funded under the Indigenous Advancement Strategy.
The Indigenous Advancement Strategy distributes grants and funds for Indigenous programs and in 2021-22 the Morrison government gave it $5.7 billion to be delivered over four years.
NIAA public affairs director Sonia Singh told The Klaxon the NIAA “entered into a contract on 23 May 2023 which is compliant with relevant rules and guidelines”.
“The decision to engage PriceWaterhouseCoopers Indigenous Consulting was made on 8 May 2023,” Singh said.
Regardless of when the “decision” to enter the contract with PwC’s Indigenous Consulting was made, the contract was entered into on 23 May — which was four days after the Department of Finance warning.
Singh said the NIAA was “reviewing its practices”.
“Along with other organisations across government, the NIAA is reviewing practices to make sure that ethical considerations is (sic) taken into account before future contracts are entered into,” said Singh.
The NIAA provided that response to The Klaxon in June, but it is being reported now for the first time.
Searches show the NIAA has given a second contract to PwC Indigenous Consulting since the clampdown.
On Wednesday last week AusTender was updated to show PwC’s Indigenous Consulting had been given another federal contract.
It has been given a $91,982 contract with the description provided simply: “stakeholder engagement and consultation services”.
The contract was awarded by the NIAA.
This article first appeared at The Klaxon and is republished with permission.
The NIAA comprises Public Servants who have to adopt the policy of the current Government.They are NOT elected. Last year only 20% of NIAA members were First Nations people. This information came from Marcia Langton and a former male member of NIAA on a Sky 603 Referendum panel on Sunday 3 September. Marcia Langton quoted specific financial abuse of the system in the NT by a former coalition Minister funding non – Indigenous projects .She stressed the need for careful auditing of the NIAA budget.
This is what happens when there are no penalties for robbing the tax payer. Carry on.
We need to make a bit of a statement to let them know its over. Put someone in gaol for gods sake. I am assuming we are serious about this. Am I wrong?
It’s longstanding now using external consultants and grifters, a la Thomas Frank’s ‘The Wrecking Crew’
‘“Bad government is the natural product of rule by those who believe government is bad.” Frank argues that certain elements of the Republican Party intentionally dismantled the government by many means, including turning public policy into a private-sector feeding frenzy. Frank describes the state of the federal government of the United States as analogous to a large group of privatized pigs feeding at the public trough, which was brought on by the privatization schemes engineered by the Republicans’
Locally, there is not even competition for corruption?
It’s time to build up the public service with honourable, skilled and knowledgeable people. After all those people in these consultancy services are no more skilled than a team of specially recruited members of the PS who are answerable to a Minister and not there for profit making
Truly abysmal. If ever there was an argument for a publicly-accountable Voice, surely this cynical alternative is it.