What was claimed
A total of 105,000 asylum seekers have entered Australia since Labor took government in May 2022.
Our verdict
False. The figure relates to people with failed or pending asylum applications. Most entered Australia under the previous Coalition government.
Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has attacked Labor’s immigration record, claiming 105,000 asylum seekers have entered Australia since Anthony Albanese’s government was elected.
This is false. The 105,000 figure relates to the number of asylum seekers in Australia at the end of August 2023. Most were already in the country at the time of the May 2022 federal election. The majority of asylum seekers residing in Australia arrived during the 2013-22 Coalition government.
Dutton made the claim multiple times during an interview in Western Australia on October 4.
“Labor’s presided over 105,000 asylum seekers over the course of the last 15 months — a record number in our country,” he said. “You’ve got 105,000 asylum seekers that have come in on [Albanese’s] watch.”
The opposition leader was answering questions on immigration after the release of the Nixon review, a Labor-commissioned inquiry into the alleged exploitation of Australia’s visa system.
His comments about 105,000 asylum seekers coming to Australia under Labor were reported in The Sydney Morning Herald, Guardian Australia and The Australian Financial Review, though all three media outlets pointed out the inaccuracy of Dutton’s claim.
AAP FactCheck asked Dutton’s office for the basis of his claim but did not receive a response.
The Department of Home Affairs publishes detailed statistics on visa applications, immigration and asylum seeker claims. The figure at the centre of the claim relates to applications for subclass 866 visas, otherwise known as permanent onshore protection visas.
The department describes the subclass 866 visa as being “for people who arrived in Australia on a valid visa and want to seek asylum”. The visa is available only to people already in Australia who cleared immigration when they first arrived.
Asylum seekers offered a subclass 866 visa can stay in Australia permanently as long as they meet other requirements, the department says.
The Refugee Council of Australia says it takes an average of more than two years for an onshore protection visa application to reach an initial decision by the department. Rejected applications can take 10 years or more to go through the full appeal and judicial review process, it says.
Asylum can also be claimed by people who arrive by sea, which the department refers to as “unauthorised maritime arrivals” (UMAs). However, for the purposes of this fact-check, all figures refer only to subclass 866 onshore protection visas, which was the subject of Dutton’s claim.
The department publishes monthly statistics about subclass 866 visas as part of its humanitarian program dataset. That data shows 29,246 people in Australia were waiting for a decision on their subclass 866 visa application in August 2023, the most recent figures available at the time of writing (page 4). An additional 75,430 people had been refused a visa but remained in Australia and were “yet to be deported”, the figures show.
Adding the two categories together makes a total of 104,676 asylum seekers either awaiting an outcome for their visa request or who had had their application refused. By comparison, the data for May 2022, the month Labor was elected to government, shows 94,260 asylum seekers in Australia were either waiting for a visa decision or already had an application refused.
Therefore, the number of asylum seekers has increased by about 10,400 people under Labor, when compared with May 2022. By those measures, it is clear Dutton’s claim is wrong as most asylum seekers were already in the country by the time Labor came to power.
However, Associate Professor Daniel Ghezelbash from UNSW Sydney’s Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law told AAP FactCheck it was not possible to say exactly when those asylum seekers entered the country.
“None of these people actually arrived as asylum seekers. All of them came through other visa pathways,” Ghezelbash said. Because the visa was open only to people who had already passed through immigration, it was unusual for a protection claim to be lodged at an airport.
“It is far more likely they’ve spent time living in the community on another valid visa for some period of time. It can be anywhere from a few months to many years.”
It was likely the vast majority of the 94,260 asylum seekers already in the country at the time of the May 2022 election entered Australia during the previous nine years of Coalition government, Ghezelbash said.
The data shows 23,882 new subclass 866 visa applications were lodged in the first 15 full months of the Labor government (June 2022 to August 2023 inclusive). Therefore, 23,882 is the maximum possible number of current asylum seekers who entered Australia during that period.
However, it is impossible to say how many people who entered the country in the past 15 months will claim asylum at some point in the future.
AAP FactCheck’s analysis of the data found an approval rate of around 13% for subclass 866 visas. This takes into account the total number of visa applications between September 2021 and August 2023 and the total number of approvals. However, it is not possible to determine whether the approvals relate to the visa applications for the same period.
New applications have averaged about 1,300 each month over the same period, though the number of monthly lodgements has increased significantly since the 2022 federal election.
Labor has responded to the Nixon review by pledging almost $160 million of additional resources to help speed up visa processing.
The verdict
Dutton’s claim Labor has overseen 105,000 asylum seekers entering Australia is false. The figure refers to the 104,676 asylum seekers in the country as of August 2023. It does not refer to newly arrived asylum seekers, as suggested by Dutton.
Most of those 104,676 people were already in the country by the time Labor came to power in May 2022.
However, because onshore protection visas are available only to people who enter the country with a valid visa, it is impossible to say exactly how many asylum seekers came to Australia during any given period.
False. The claim is inaccurate.
Peter Dutton was wrong. What a surprise!
Wrong? lied.
Peter Dutton misrepresented responsibility in more ways than numbers. His very particular choice of the words Presided Over to suggest Labor is responsible drags a very fat and oily red herring across the trail of the truth regarding ongoing difficulties in the path of refugees.
It was the Morrison government which decimated the workforce who were processing claims, thus adding to the backlog and dragging out the anguish and distress for those who applied. They also made the whole process unnecessarily difficult and narrowed criteria to the extent that many more have suffered an extra layer of trauma they could have done without.
The current federal government a while back set about reversing that shrinkage of the number of people processing the delayed asylum seeker applications.
What price do we care to put on humanity, compassion and loving-kindness in this precious and abused planet.? ??️☮️
Why doesn’t your headline say “Dutton Lies Again”?
Maybe because it has a faint echo of ‘Destry Rides Again’? No, I’ve no idea.
A loose connection to the truth *and* dog whistling xenophobia. He’s all class.
Yet again, Dutton has shown that he wants one thing, to be the next PM, and doesn’t care how he gets there.
This time it’s a sound bite that will enter the minds of the rwnj’s, and confirm what they already “know” about refugees/african gangs/greenies destroying Australia etc. etc.
This quote from the article says it all.
“AAP FactCheck asked Dutton’s office for the basis of his claim but did not receive a response.”