There’s always a prize in the Sanfeng Energy crane game.
Three giant claws — the biggest a kid could ever want to play with — descend into what is likely the world’s biggest garbage can, a concrete Stygian pit hectares in size, and ascend clutching a colossal treasure of prize Chongqing garbage. They then carry it over to a chute that leads to an inferno helping to produce 30MW of power in a facility in the heavily wooded backblocks of the Mountain City. Household waste that would otherwise have gone to landfill helps power the Chongqing grid.
Chongqing, the vast megalopolis of south-western China, is among other things a key Belt and Road port — a logistics centre we visit features a global map centred on Chongqing, with routes around the world both very real, like the rail line that starts there and ends in Germany, and decidedly imaginary, like the putative trade routes extending on the map from China across the Asian region. With a skyline taken straight from a science fiction film and vast infrastructure to move 20-plus million people around a city positioned between three mountains, everything in Chongqing is big. Big population. Big roadworks. Big garbage. We know because we get to see several hundred tonnes of it being tossed into the furnace at Sanfeng.
To illustrate the process, our robotic guide (albeit not as robotic as the actual robot that delivers my meds when I get COVID-19 in Shanghai) ushers us into a theatre to watch what is probably one of the more bizarre industrial videos ever made — a film following the journey, or should that be ordeal, of a little boy’s teddy bear. Said plush toy is callously abandoned by its growing owner in favour of more sophisticated playthings, but is saved from meaningless mouldering in landfill by Sanfeng, which extracts and incinerates the creature. Far from being unhappy with this fiery fate, the bear welcomes it (“I’m feeling warm and toasty!” it cries, plunging toward the flames) as enabling it to then guide us through Sanfeng’s high-tech process of scrubbing the dioxins and heavy metals from the resulting fly ash.
With the neighbours mainly heavily forested mountains, there are few NIMBY problems — not that there’s much of that in China, one gathers, but the entire plant is sealed and its processes isolated, so there’s not even a whiff of garbage. The tour of the huge facility — you run out of similes for “big” real fast in Chongqing — concludes with the power plant control room, which turns out to be literally the only thing we’re not allowed to photograph in China. Among the images being fed back to the huge display board are views from within the inferno where the teddy met its end, along with the rubbish of 20-odd million Chongqing citizens (not counting another 10 million or so around abouts).
Sanfeng, after a period with US investment, is a publicly traded company mainly owned by Chongqing region state-owned enterprises. This is unsurprising, given that the primary source of income for waste-to-energy plants the world over is actually tip fees, not power revenue, and 20 million people produce a lot of rubbish. The overall process reduces the requisite landfill by 75% to 80%, and much of the remainder is used in road construction — which in this region still appears a boom industry judging by the vast pillars intended to hold up new freeways that dot the landscape.
The visit provides a one-two punch for Australian mindsets with the trip the next day to automobile manufacturer Changan, which is headquartered in Chongqing. While the streets of Chinese cities now don’t look too different to Western cities in terms of the numbers of American, Japanese and European vehicles, you can’t miss the heavy presence of Chinese-manufactured electric and hybrid vehicles. Changan makes an extensive range of them, from luxury SUVs — we’re talking Western luxury levels, if you’re inclined to be dismissive — through to a tiny electric two-seater, with only the very top-end, limited edition vehicles with the lie-back-and-have-a-massage-while-the-car-parks-itself seats costing more than A$50,000. And all partnered with Huawei for its IT and navigation systems, although your chances of the government not knowing where you are at any time, given the proliferation of cameras on major roads in China, is minimal anyway.
A later tour of one of Changan’s factories shows why modern heavy manufacturing is a mug’s game for developed countries. The cars are assembled, complete with tyres and the battery pack, on a line worked entirely by Japanese-built robots, with a few human handlers keeping an eye on things. Once transferred to the fitout line, robots provide the materials while human workers insert the interiors, ready the engines and add the finishing touches before they reach the end, someone hops in and drives it around the corner into the loading bay.
The Europeans are terrified of these cheap Chinese electric vehicles, and are investigating whether to impose punitive tariffs on the basis that China is subsidising companies like Changan. But coming from a country where there is still limited charging infrastructure, politicians demonise EVs, and vehicle emission standards are a generation behind anywhere else, the robots assembling the vehicles and sticking the batteries in them feels like a glimpse of the future as much as the incinerated teddy or the Blade Runner skyline.
Bernard Keane visited China as a guest of the All-China Journalists Association.
As far as EVs are concerned, anyone who has been following the global market for the last couple of years could tell you that Western and East Asian automobile manufacturers have been in a death-spiral for some time. It’s not that the Chinese manufacturers are inherently superior, it’s more that established manufacturers have refused to see the writing on the wall and have tried, instead, to turn back the tide.
And as far as government support is concerned, the difference between China and countries like the US is that China bails out companies BEFORE they go bankrupt, not after.
Truth is, China has out-capitalisted the West. Suck it up, buckaroos.
What a cracker of a story, doesn’t it highlight the difference between private competition just sitting on ideas, and government backed enterprise, less red tape because there’s less ability to backslide for a quick profit. And then there’s the repercussions for not acting in the people’s best interests.
It is a big price to pay sitting here in limbo as a country when capitalism used with the ideology of neoliberalism game the whole process of progress and change to keep the status quo.
Great piece.
China is streets ahead of the West when it comes to EV’s. What the world needs to realize though is that micro-EVs <800 kg and < 20kWh batteries are the only sustainable option in terms of CO2 emissions and resource consumption. A large SUV emits >2 tCO2 per year from its embodied CO2 alone, even when running on clean electricity. Our entire carbon footprints have to reduce 6 fold to <2tCO2 per year just to stop CO2 concentration in the atmosphere rising further. How long can the rich and uncaring be allowed to destroy the climate by commuting in tanks?
If you listen to people who know about what’s happening in China from first hand experience, travelling for business or living and working there etc China is apparently worlds ahead in technology in general.
Bernard, does this incinerator capture green house gases, or are we just alternating the methods of pollution.
At least methane is not produced as occurs in landfill. Now to capture the methane from our sewage, along with other valuables, as well as recycling the water.
The only reason methane is produced in landfill is because it is generated by the dumping of organic waste. Its a very easy fix that doesn’t need incinerators. You simply remove organic waste from the residual waste stream as Australian states have a plan to do so. FOGO is now a national policy so there is no reason for landfills to produce methane unless they refuse to install landfill gas capture (to make energy) or continue to dump organic waste in landfill. Perversely, incinerators don’t want organic waste either because it is too wet and would require pre-treatment to dry it out before it could be incinerated. No organic waste should be going to landfill or incineration. The biosphere needs it (to sequester carbon) …not the atmosphere.
Appears that Bernard doesn’t have an answer to this question. Waste incineration is the most polluting and expensive way to manage the smallest fraction of any waste stream – residual waste. No, incinerators do not capture their climate pollution. They emit more ghg’s than coal, oil and gas per unit of energy produced….so you are correct to highlight this as a major issue. Our planet cannot afford waste incineration – a technology more climate polluting than fossil fuels because it relies on plastic (a dirty fossil fuel) for its calorific value.