Well, credit where it’s due: Labor said it would lift wages growth and, at least for the three months to September, it has.
Wages growth has been chugging along at 0.8% a quarter since mid-2022 — good by Coalition-era standards, when wage stagnation was a deliberate design feature of policy, but barely up to the level when Labor was last in power, and still well below inflation. Finally, in the September quarter, workers on average actually had a rise in their real wage, albeit 0.1%.
Three big interventions played a major role in the rise, though pleasingly the labour market showed some signs of what you might term “organic” growth.
The September quarter wage price index (WPI) rise of 1.3% was, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), the largest quarterly rise recorded in the 26 years the WPI has been measured. The consumer price index rose 1.2% in the same period on a headline basis while the favoured core measure, the trimmed mean, was also up 1.2%
The quarter made for a 4% increase in wages over the year to September — the highest since 2009 — but workers were still behind in terms of annual real wage growth, given the annual inflation rate to September was 5.4%. Private sector wages growth — 4.2% — fell less in real terms than the public sector level of growth of 3.5%.
The big rise was driven by the Fair Work Commission’s annual wage review decision that saw low-paid workers receive an award increase of 5.75%, a result cheered by the government back in June. And the first tranche of the commission’s aged care work value decision was also implemented, giving aged care workers an immediate rise of 15% — again, with the support of the government, which had committed to fund the decision.
And if you remember Philip Lowe railing against government wage caps back in the days before his re-embrace of neoliberal orthodoxy, there was also a public sector wages bump from the removal of state government wage caps and bargaining rounds being completed.
While a tight labour market reinforced these factors, they were all expected, including by the Reserve Bank in its last statement of monetary policy for the year earlier this month. They’re all one-offs, although there will hopefully be further adjustments to aged care remuneration after the Fair Work Commission finalises its determination about the sector.
More positively, wage growth in the quarter occurred across each of the different wage-setting methods. Jobs paid by individual arrangements were the main driver of wage growth (that’s been happening since late 2020), but award and enterprise agreement jobs also contributed more to wages growth than historically seen in a September quarter. And both the proportion of jobs that had a wage increase and the size of the increases received played a role in growth.
Accommodation and food services — hospitality to people outside the ABS — saw the biggest rise, 3.2% in the quarter and 5.5% in the year. Because that sector employs nearly a million people, that had a substantial impact on the overall result. But as the ABS pointed out, some hospitality jobs received two award increases over the year due to a scheduled delay in the implementation of the 2021-22 annual award review determination by the Fair Work Commission, driving the higher-than-usual annual growth for this industry. That also means their quarterly and annual rates will fall sharply in the next couple of quarters.
But health and social assistance had an even bigger impact: 3.1% for the quarter and 4.9% annually. That was a little less than hospitality but because that sector employs a massive 2.1 million people, or more than one in seven workers, including around 200,000 residential care workers, any wage movements have a major impact on overall growth nationally.
The lowest annual growth (3.1%) was in financial services — a sector where it’s raining profits and buybacks and higher dividends at the big four banks who are responsible for most of the employment in this sector.
And the mining industry recorded the lowest quarterly index growth (0.8%) — suggesting allegedly “militant” unions in the sector have good grounds for the industrial disputes that have the galahs at The Australian Financial Review shrieking about threats to global energy markets.
Speaking of said AFR galahs, they immediately began flapping and squawking about inflation after the ABS release. Nothing like a good old wage-price-spiral scare — how dare workers finally reverse what is now years of real wage falls with a mighty real wage rise of … 0.1%. Presumably journalists at the AFR all handed back the 1.5% wage rise their own sector of information, media and telecommunications recorded in the quarter…
It’s taken a near-decade of wage stagnation and a couple of years of real wage collapses before we’ve finally seen policy and institutional processes used to give workers at least a temporary bump in wages growth. Amazing what can be done if governments make an effort.
Not to worry. Hundreds of thousands of extra workers will soon see this hellish imbalance in favour of labour fixed.
And none of this nonsense about fair rates of pay like…wots that old word?…an award!
Thanks a heap, Hawke, PJK & Kelty.
“8 hours to work/8 hours to play, 8 hours to sleep and 8 bob a day” – how quaint.
Too right,mate,sold out by the Alternaive Liberal Party.
P
‘Hellish’? What ‘hundreds of thousands of extra workers’, surely you mean ‘hundreds of thousands’ of international students & backpackers caught under the NOM net overseas migration (12/16+ month residency) vs. the more modest reality of ten’s of thousands of skilled migrants under the permanent cap?
Makes a good headline, but barely replaces the mass of boomers transitioning to retirement over the next two decades (commensurate increase in retirees or dependents)…..just saying…
LOL. Imagine thinking backpackers on working holiday visas and students – a large fraction of whom choose to come here mainly because of the work rights they get – won’t be working. You deadset live in a fantasy world.
Comfortably replaces them, per the figures I showed the last time you said this. With a net surplus of 50-100k/yr from memory.
Promoting nativist sentiments or opinions with neither support, nor understanding?
When the misnamed and misunderstood NOM Net Overseas Migration (border movements not ‘immigration’), spiked the population from 2007 due to more students, ‘Australia’s best demographer’ cited a 500k++ number of ‘immigrants’ suggesting permanence (like UK red tops are doing presently for the Tories), to both mislead and confuse Australians, esp data illiterate media, by describing NOM as ‘immigration’.
Why would anyone follow your ‘analysis’ when you personally denigrate internationally renowned researchers & demographers Bricker & Ibbitson, avoid their specific analysis on UNPD forecasts*, plus the issues local demographers offshore have with both the ‘conservative’ UNPD and Paul ‘Population Bomb’ Ehrlich, while platforming ‘Australia’s best demographer’ and MB (both linked to Ehrlich, one directly)?
*Presume you know what the issue is that Bricker & Ibbitson, and local demographers in India, Kenya etc. have with the UNPD’s forecasts?
Then it’s presenting nativist authoritarian and Malthusian tropes of 18-19th century masquerading as demographic analysis, then follow Tanton’s advice (colleague of Ehrlich at fossil fuel ZPG), get people talking about ‘immigration’, includes dog whistling, dodgy data etc..
As someone said in pre WWII Central Europe ‘people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it’
Not linking anyone cited to that era, but allegedly it’s quite simple to links via some in the US with shared interests 🙂
Just ad hominem, vapid blather and absurd beliefs.
As usual.
Too right they were flapping at the neoliberal majority media outlets, proper wages lead to inflation, its Labor fault but what can you do?
That is the crowing of the neoliberal establishment enjoying their enormous advantage of owning all the media outlets, they own what the “truth” is. It was concerning reading the bullying coming from the ABC neoliberal stooges ensconsed by the coalition. The hypocrisy of having a go at reporters for being political then repeating what the other outlets are saying without acknowledging the bias. That is the state of our democracy.
It is, also rather amazing that Bernard’s other article about Dutton reads like the nightly entertainment on all of the mainstream media outlets, he’s the news or is that NCIS Miami? it is incredible that there is a groomed audience that accepts this ideologically driven tripe as reasonable .
It seems Crikey are feeling very small up against the political times, not being able to comment means I learn less from others that have insight.
Things fall apart