Five, maybe six thousand years ago, the people of ancient Sumer would move from city to city for the different festivals, often associated with phases of the moon, represented as the celestial feminine. Tent encampments sprang up, cities swelled to twice their size, ornaments and decorations were made and exchanged. Markets may well have been a product of these divine processions, rather than arising from any utilitarian purpose. Whatever the goddess shines on has value.
Thus it will be at Accor Stadium, as Taylor Swift takes the stage, and as it was around the MCG in Melbourne last weekend. Sydney probably won’t raise to the level of total commitment that Melbourne was able to muster, if only because Melbourne is only ever half-real anyway. With its little trams toot-tootling around baroque ornamental Victorian neighbourhoods, it’s pretty much a Wes Anderson movie. So it wasn’t much of a stretch to have it invaded by an army of girls in shimmering silver paillette sequin dresses and pink tasselled cowboy hats, swapping and giving out homemade beaded bracelets.
The scene outside the MCG across those three nights was very strange, and striking, and moving, and it spread across the whole city. It would have been foolish to deny its deep, tidal pull. Outside the vast concrete walls of the G, like the temple walls of the old cities, tens of thousands gathered, hours before Swift came on at 7.30 sharp, mothers herding small-daughter-and-friends groups, mother and tweens in matching spangles, tassels and cowboy hats, teens of all genders and none, in all variations.
The scene was possibly more simple and uncomplicated joy than I think I have ever experienced, something which various grizzled veterans I ran into attested to. The Fabian in me felt sorry for those kids who couldn’t get a ticket, still more for those whose parents would never have had a hope of affording one. Tay Tay, with a little help from the state government, could have set up jumbotron TVs outside on the last night, so all comers could see it.
But the sound came through the walls anyway, the thousands who had sat down on the grass among the merch stalls and ice-cream vans and hot dog concessions seemed to get something like as much pleasure from the self-created event, from its solidarity and make-do, as they might have from the event itself. Everyone who was there felt they had been at something strange and beautiful, and very much welcome.
The various grinches who have descended on Taylormania down under like to suggest that Taylor Swift is a fad without content, pure craze. It’s extraordinary how many, and from what sort of ideological corners, such accusations come, because it’s so extraordinarily olde-worlde sexist, the sort of thing said in 1963, and, really, a repurposing of old notions of female hysteria. What drives Swiftmania (whoops!) from its core is not the fashions, the style sub-culture, the glitter jumpsuits, the dance numbers, or the endurance rally of the three-and-a-half-hour concerts.
What drives it is the songs. The songs are simply excellent. They’re the acme of the white pop canon, multi-genre numbers that draw in every motif and innovation since “pop” emerged as a distinct genre in the early 1960s. The songs are why Swift has ascended far beyond Britney, Christina and the rest. Those who dismiss Swift’s songs as sameish simply don’t understand them musically, or their internal complexity.
Swift’s dozen or so greatest numbers more or less sing themselves spontaneously, emerge from people. Kitchen staff bursting into “You Belong With Me”, a woman in a traffic-jammed car singing along to “All Too Well”, a late middle-aged journalist singing “Blank Space” anytime he is not prevented from doing so. These songs are, essentially, perfect, unimprovable within their genre. Taylor Swift soars above her peers not because her fanbase is addled and easily led, but due to the exact opposite: they’re pre-teen epicureans, attuned to finding the best that is sung and strummed.
The whiteness? Dear me, yes, Taylor Swift is white. Look, in a way, nothing in pop is white these days. Swift’s early bubble-blonde and baby-fat hardcore country stuff aside, there’s always enough off-beat to put it in the pop-rock register. But, yeah, while it draws in K-pop and other influences along the way, Swift’s stuff is other to Rihanna and Beyonce.
That doesn’t seem to limit her appeal. There were quite a few brown kids around the MCG last weekend — although their parents might possibly have been a little less thrilled to be there than the white daggy dads using their kids as a barely concealed alibi to be there. But yeah, you can’t help but ask about the deeper processes underway.
Swift is essentially the last pop star of a certain type, the omega point of wall-of-sound, girl groups, doo-wop, country-pop, power-pop, alt-pop, pop-punk and every other variant. Does her totalising success reinscribe a white mythology in a way that leaves black music nothing else to be but the “dark other”, more exciting and dangerous, but also supplemental and secondary?
The ancient moon goddesses would eventually become Artemis/Artemisia in the Greek/Roman pantheon, the white light of eternal girlhood, chaste and chased, but never caught (unlike the mighty Aphrodite who was, let’s face it, a bit easy). So, yes, in the way she’s deployed, she does draw a line between Europe and the rest. But, well, even if you wanted to, you can’t make a law against the moonlight.
Taylor Swift, the whole cultural entity, equal parts she, her co-writers and producers, is something many many millions want, more than they want anything else, and in that, their taste is correct by definition. Not much has changed over the millennia in what we seek in the ethereal — to be weightless and in the air for one evening, lifted by the spirits.
The truth is, in any matter that does not involve mass killing, the masses are always right in their tastes, and it is worth either trying to join yourself to it as much as you can or not deny its power out of embarrassment that something so basic has joined to you. A culture is a cult that keeps going, and that’s what one saw outside the MCG last weekend. And if you want to suggest, using a now-discarded 2000s parlance, that it’s a little lame, well all that can I say is, shade never made anyone less gay.
Let me say Guy you a gem but in this case, for a change, I can have a chuckle at you and not with you. One of life’s little pleasures is listening to others wax lyrically about music they like. Not to say they aren’t genuine, they just aren’t you and so sound silly! For those who, like me, who don’t know their Tayor Swift make sure not to check her out on your spotify account, that algorithm will get you every time and you will be stuck with her for the term of your natural subscription.
For what it’s worth if Taylor Swift wasn’t Taylor Swift then someone else would be, we see this every 5-10 years
Exactly. When did popularity suddenly equate with substance?
She’s a poet.
“When did popularity suddenly equate with substance?”
That was the animals era of popular music – beatles, monkees, byrds, animals. Everyone thought that, because they’d spent a few bucks on some vinyl, it must be good. All you can say with certainty is that it was popular.
Well I just listened to my first swift song and how she navigates and drives in teenage girls minds across the globe dragging US culture along with it is a breath of fresh air . Our
Amyl and the sniffers make for a suitable chaser.
Well done on not mentioning an act you like.
My 15yo daughter and I went to Melbourne last weekend for the Saturday night concert.
She was so excited that she cried when Taylor came on and then proceeded to have the happiest 3 1/2 hours of her life. Which in turn meant I had one of the happiest 3 1/2 hours of my life.
Then multiply that by 10s of thousands of people at the concert and then by scores of concerts and you can’t help but agree with Guy’s observation – Taylor is about creating joy, a LOT of joy.
So for those who criticise her, I can only assume that they haven’t been to one of her concerts because it was an incredibly uplifting experience.
Never mind all the media analyses of the various economic benefits of the Eras tour – I’d like to read an estimate of the emotional ripple effect of all the thousands of ecstatically happy concert-goers. Random smiles at passers-by are up by X%, arguments between parents and teenagers down by Y%…
I agree. The great flaw in using the GDP for measurement of the condition of our society is that it can only measure money.
I have tried several times to hit the UP arrow on Carolyn H’s comment to negate the minus 1 somebody put there and the algorithm says I have already commented.
Except I haven’t.
Crikey really needs to sort out its IT. Last week I didn’t have to log in every day. This week I do.
To make sure somebody reads this, I am going to copy it, insert some profanity, and then paste it as a new comment. That means it will be marked Awaiting Approval, which is the only way I can be sure somebody reads it.
Somehow you have been downvoted on providing some feedback on an operational issue? That’s weird…
I just upvoted your comment and it gave you two, so sometimes it works for you.
I keep being told I have to log in to read the comments when I am already logged in, I just hit the “my account” button, see I’m logged in, go back to the article and it lets me read the comments, pretty annoying.
Getting back to TS I don’t know any of her songs but whenever I hear the lyrics I’m very impressed, including the Calm Down one that GR kindly provided a link to.
That alone makes Ms Swift’s work worthwhile. In a shitty world where the future of young people is lined with unaffordable housing, rising HECS debts, insecure work, the threat of climate change, media beat-ups about alleged threats from China, wars always happening somewhere, and all the rest of the gloom in the media, it actually might be a benefit to the mental health of the masses to forget about it all and just enjoy the moment. There is a place for circuses when the bread is becoming uncertain.
Murdoch is a shit. Now I know you’ve read the above.
“emotional ripple effect of all the thousands of ecstatically happy concert-goers”. In contrast to the ripple effect of thousands of morose and depressive Morrissey fans at a Morrissey concert? I remember when he had to cancel a concert at the last minute. The fans didn’t know whether to be more morose and depressed or not.
Guy only gushes so luxuriously because like everyone else in the meeja he is mildly terrified of what manner of brilliantly-humiliating, career-ending smash hit she’d lob at him, in the event that he dissed her even slightly.
We’re all Swifties now, and I for one welcome our multi-threatening new Amazonian overlords.
Nah boss. TS music is drab, conceited drivel. I’m a big fan of pop music, but TS just aint it. Not one to yuck anyone’s yum, and people clearly like her and good on them, but gosh there is better music to be had.
More importantly though to me is the debasement of ‘culture’ that the Eras Tour represents. Music, culture and the rest of it should be available to the masses – but the exorbitant cost of Swift tickets ensured that only the wealthy could enjoy the show. Unlucky to the Swifties who were born to parents found guilty of wanting for money; this experience is not for you.
People in the position of Taylor Swift and the like have a duty to democratise culture, and make it available to those who are otherwise excluded from this part of society.
The profiteering billionaire is to me, not surprisingly, offensive.
Always hilarious when someone compares one lot of pop music with another, and says, that lot is bad. Usually means, you didn’t grow up with it, so didnt attach to it.
No-one becomes this popular for this long, without the music being, in the terms of its own genre, good. It’s just a mistake about your own preferences to think otherwise
Ticket prices? Debasement of culture? Most tickets were around $80. There’s been a lot worse concert bandits than TS, going back decades
Actually, Love Story came out in my last year of High School, but go off queen. There is just genuinely better, if less popular pop musicians than Taylor Swift; Alex Lahey, Teghan & Sarah, Wet Leg, Hallie, Spiderbait, and also – Miley Cyrus if we want to talk about American mega-stars. I’m glad that you’ve found some music that speaks to you, but to argue that it is anything more than manufactured big biz is ludicrous.
I’d also point out that she hasn’t been this popular for this long – Swifty-mania is a relatively new phenomenon given the length of her career (half of which has been spent re-releasing her old albums).
Your article was about Taylor Swift though, was just keeping on topic. If “others are doing it worse” is your legitimate response, then I suppose there is no need to ever look to improve anything, provided we’re not at the back of the pack.
How are the musicians you suggest ‘genuinely’ better? You mean you prefer what is a recognisably indie style, which has certain genre conventions. You simply establish an external standard based on yr preferences. It’s an old trick, especially by people who like indie music. What does manufactured big biz mean? You mean writing music that a lot of people like? The horror!
It’s the old indie/alt whatever power move: if it’s popular it must be worse. Nah.
Swift’s been a popular figure, in 2 genres, for 20 years. The steady rise is because more people kept liking it, surely.
Do Tegan and Sara and Wetleg really charge much less than $80 a ticket? This all seems spurious indie nonsense, aimed at mass culture
I wouldn’t call any of the musicians I’ve mentioned indie. It’s all pop, by its nature manufactured to be popular.
You’re right that its all subjective and down to individual taste. Given that I’d suggest you’re spending too much time with arguing with people that don’t share yours.
I don’t know how much Tegan & Sara or Wetleg charge for tickets, couldn’t even tell you if they’ve been to Australia.
I am going to see Queens of the Stone Age which I paid some $200/ticket for which I think is *drum roll* obscene, but my partner likes them. Happily foist the same criticism on them.
You even made the same point about people unable to attend or afford to attend in your article – the missed opportunity of a jumbotron.
Tell you what WAS a good valve concert though, <$50 to see David Duchovny play guitar at my local pub.
What? When and where did that happen? Was he any good?
A while ago haha. He toured in 2018. He’s got 2 albums -folk rock, not great but inoffensive.
Someone posted photos from the Eatons Hill show; David Duchovny @ Eatons Hill Hotel (themusic.com.au)
He’s terrible.
Jake Gyllenhall, is that really you…?
As you know, Tay Tay’s all over you mate:
‘And you would hide away and find your peace of mind
With some indie record that’s much cooler than mine…’
An obscure has-been TV hack playing outlier pubs in a whole different country! That’s so peak US Indie hipster that I’m now imagining Mulder in a break-back-in Tarantino flic…
Apparently Jake used to drag Tay Tay to crap pretentious gigs with about four people in the audience, and gaslight her outrageously by claiming they were the ‘real’ musical artists. So weird to see the same stuff flying about here…
Guy’s actually arguing with people who believe that, because their personal taste rates “X” more highly than anyone else, then “X” is objectively better than anyone else. For many, disagreement about X’s primacy then “proves” a whole lot of other negative generalisations. Theocracy.
Aye. But then that is the modern ‘progressives’ entire political mode, HC:
* ‘The music I like is objectively good, because I like it, and I only like good music.’
* What I think is objectively right, because I think it, and I only think right things.’
As you say: theocratic delusions. And lefties pretend they don’t believe in God!! ?
Theodor Adorno once said something along the lines that people’s enjoyment of pop music isn’t about the quality or originality of the music but about their own memories of adolescence and the associations that the music carries with it. So such arguments are pointless.
100% correct. Doesn’t it show in the “comments”?
I will make a concession here – The music isn’t for me. I’m a grown man, and do not fit in the target demo for Swift’s music, nor did I when it was new.
nah, yr still just asserting an absolute standard, which accord with your tastes – indie musos who, to my ear, lack craft, and swap in attitude
Every age has its own popular music, some of it great. I think Richard Neville said that, though others probably have too. Were Taylor’ s tickets really $80? That sounds pretty good.
Looks like its 80 for obstructed views in G class seats
Thanks.
Off topic, but we only got restricted view at the rear seats for The Boss in Adelaide. They were great! We were almost in touching distance of Brucey & his crew, had an excellent practical view of proceedings & the band didn’t forget us, often turning around to face us. So you can be lucky.
And the blokes at the monolith ticket MASTERS ? Firstly she is a winner in re claming her ownership rights over her music ;buying up her music copyright by re-recording / releasing on her own label ; (BMG cancelling sentient Roger Waters for his stance against the murder of innocents ; or Louise Distays daring to buck the gaslighting) – maybe Swifte is really a lot shrewder or sophisticated than the critics assume – Golly now how about getting rid of monopoly ticket gate keepers – playing with her profits … wheres the outrage against the ticket venue monopoly?
On Sydney ABC 702 this morning, Craig Receussal played a Swift song…and a 13 year old girl rang up and admonished him for playing the Scooter Braun version, not Taylor’s Version. She then patiently explained why.
That is what is called a musically educated, artistically elite and truly Indie fan base.
I think I preferred Guy explaining stuff about Brittany et al…