In the early dark, among floodlit red and orange autumn trees and red-brick buildings, several hundred kids swarmed the main intersection of State College, Pennsylvania — home of Pennsylvania State University, aka Penn State — the placards brandished, hoodies and jeans ubiquitous, muscle boys in T-shirts, tall, tanned, WASP-y girls in shorts, a few in Goodwill (op shop) chic.
“This is not your place,” the signs read. “Whose campus?” “Our campus!” A megaphone bo-… megaphone person was up on a park bench, wrapped in a green coat and antifa black, their face scarfed, which made clear communication difficult. “Foov thamputh?” “Our campus!” more like. They demasked a little. “We’re going to move, but we’re going to move as one now! Everyone needs to stay safe!” Ohhhhhh, safe, I thought — here we go, bloody safety again. The little homunculus in my head raged. Safety? In my day demos were all about danger! We… oh, hang on: a “FASCISTS OFF CAMPUS” sign loomed in my face and reminded me that this was actually a demonstration against actual fascists. Gavin McInnes and the Proud Boys had come to town.
News that McInnes, the coif-bearded hipster founder of Rebel Media, was coming to town had raced around the state a week or so earlier. The visit is part of the general fight for the state, the talk organised by a “student” group called Uncensored America — really a multi-campus, right-wing push outfit. McInnes was the ideal choice for what they want — which is maximum tension — because he can’t be ignored. This isn’t Jordan Peterson slumped over a lectern, telling you to make your bed, crying for his benzos, cling-wrapped steaks slipping out of his pockets. Peterson would be labelled “unsafe”, but he’s harmless. McInnes is actually, literally unsafe, a rabble-rouser who on Rebel Media plays a peekaboo game with racist “jokes”, anti-Semitic “stunts” and various bits of MRA malarkey.
That would merely be noxious, as would his various ruminations on the joys of violence, had he not also founded a group to carry it out. Where McInnes goes, various Proud Boys turn up — even if McInnes has now formally severed ties with the group — and, as often as not, beat people up. So your correspondent had no misgivings about this shut-down demo. If anyone has forfeited the right to a university platform, it’s McInnes. I was happy to join the demo as participant observer. That said, I’d got tickets to the thing, and had been planning to slip away, slip in and see what happened inside.
The demo was already slowly on the move when the megaphone ninja stood on a park bench again, and told the crowd “We’ve just had word that the talk has been cancelled.” Huge cheers. “We’re just trying to find out whether it’s true, or a trick by the administration.” Boos. “We’re going to close it down if it is.” Cheers again. Then another invocation: “Stay safe, stay together.” OK, OK. “This is important! Don’t get cut off. No one here tonight goes home alone!” This is what I’ve always understood the main purpose of student demonstrations to be; still, a guarantee from the organisers is an important innovation.
These dumb gags were unspooling in my head at about the time, I later found out, that a small squad of Proud Boys were pepper-spraying some protesters just around the corner. Demos like this are like the Battle of Borodino; you spend two hours as a part of bodies moving hither and yon, then go home and find out what actually happened on TV.
“The talk has been cancelled,” the megaphone announced, and half the crowd left immediately. The other half swarmed the exits to the building where the lecture had been set to occur. They’re so young, these kids — American undergrads look so young. They’re the same age as ours, but US high school really only gets you to a Year 10 level. Undergrad degrees are really high-school completion. Plus they can’t drink legally, so they don’t drink regularly, like we used to, ageing instantly, carried to 21 on a tide of bitter. But they were gutsy and resolute as they marched down the college’s main street, and gathered round the building entrances.
In this sea of fresh faces and small bodies, the 20 or so people who had gathered for the talk looked like… well, like me, middle-aged bearded bruisers in too much black. There were also a couple of the weird Valkyrie women who hang around these things. It was a weird and sinister atmosphere, as through the glass doors cops walked the halls of the building, and blue-suit/red-tie types — the student Republicans who’d cooked this up — barked into phones trying to work a way to get out of there. Outside, the meeja was vox-popping kids and I was trying not to listen (or harsh my solidarity buzz): “I think it’s not what Gavin McInnes does, it’s what he says.” “Like he’s trampling on my rights by what he says.” “So would you try and disrupt someone like, say, Ben Shapiro? Or Bill Kristol?” “Who?” the kid said.
Down a little, a 350-pound McInnes-ite was arguing belly-to-belly with a 350-pound protester, one in black, the other in a white “Maui Wowie” T-shirt. It was like Comic Book Guy in a funhouse mirror. “I just came to hear what he had to say,” the McInnes-ite said. “Oh, so you’re just this blank slate, you’re just this tabula rasa!’ said Maui Wowie guy.
The mood was alternating between edgy and violent, which is very much the mood of the country at the moment. Donald Trump, in a rally in Texas, looked forward to journalists being jailed and raped in prison; the Republican anti-abortion candidates now oppose abortion, even if the mother’s life is at risk; Kanye West is talking about the Jewish cabal, about killing Jews, and has just been dropped by Adidas — which takes some doing; President Biden has warned Russia not to use tactical nuclear weapons, like it was a trade dispute. On CNN that morning, a story on the sentencing of the Parkland high school mass killer was interrupted by breaking news about a high school shooter in St Louis. The latter killed a teacher and a student before police got him. He left a note saying he was lonely and isolated and had never had a girlfriend. He had also left 600 rounds in 12 magazines as ammo drops around the school he was about to shoot up. On it goes.
So it wasn’t surprising, I guess, when a paramilitary gang did turn up. And they had brought their horses. A dozen of them were suddenly there at the narrow link to the main square in front of the building, and then cops on foot — in armour — came. And came. And came. One hundred, 200 filled the space. The whole demo was running out of steam and would have been gone in another half hour, but the cops kicked it back into life. What could have brought them out so suddenly cough cough? Black kids from the nearby projects joining in cough cough? They were already on the move when they gave the disperse warning. “This is an incredible overreaction,” I said. “Do they always do this?” “They do it all the time. They got the cops out for Milo Yiannopoulos.” “Don’t worry!” someone yelled. “The horses can’t climb the steps!”
They climbed the steps.
They were on us. We broke and ran, and I had that moment I knew would come, a middle-aged man stumbling, and some 19-year-old’s hand suddenly under my elbow, pushing me up and forwards, and the mix of shame and age and gratitude and solidarity that came with it. We got clear of the horses and to the street and were saved by that most American of things: the impossibility of stopping the traffic.
Meanwhile, the college had put out a statement saying that “threats of violence” had caused them to cancel the lecture, neatly blaming protesters for their stuff-up in letting it be booked in the first place.
All of a sudden they were gone, and everyone dispersed, and the campus was itself again, in the floodlit night, the autumnal calm of the classic American campus, known to most of us only through movies. “A pledge pin?! On your u-ni-form?!” I shouted to no one in particular, reflecting that National Lampoon’s Animal House is a half-century old and, as it turns out, a document not of experience but hard-to-remember innocence of the republic.
Such an evocative article, it really took me back to some stuff, although I’ve only experienced police violence, not actual fascists.
And, you really brought out the resident Crikey libertarians, who it would appear have no idea who the proud boys are and what they do.
Those damned libertarians, how very dare they!
Yes, the absolute gall of them! Shut them down I say – definitely no place for anything approaching debate allowed BTL @ Crikey.
Must say, these two instalments of Rundle’s contribution to the debate on the upcoming midterms has been, thus far, a little uninspired – I can get very similar articles regularly from the New York Times or WaPo or listening to CNN or MSNBC.
However, I did like that extra piece of red meat Rundle threw to the crowd when he referenced Jordan Peterson – always a winner…
Most people understand that freedom is not absolute, but a balance of competing freedoms.
If you give absolute freedom to fascists, who then do what they say they will and restrict freedom for everybody else, then your granting of freedom on the misunderstanding that freedom is absolute, has resulted in less freedom overall.
How would they do that unless a majority agreed with them?
Isn’t that the democracy?
Given the Proud Boys recently used violence to prevent the peaceful transfer of power in the US, it’s somewhat naive to believe fascists will adhere to democratic norms, no?
Was Trump more moderate because he was a Minority President?
Did he respect that 3 million more Americans voted for Clinton over him?
They will take power not if the majority allow them to, but if they can.
Uness the decent majority does something other than demand that they face bans.
Enforced by Kipling’s “Tommy” – rough men who guard you while you sleep, smug & self satisfied.
You’ve got that the wrong way round.
You believe fascists are only fascists because they don’t get the airtime they believe they’re entitled to.
But, the reason they don’t get the airtime is because they’re fascists.
I do love an epepishtomemeology lesson from one unable to read, let alone spell, the word.
US style ‘libertarians’ are joined at the hip with nativism, influencing the broader Anglosphere, ultimately by Nobel Prize winner Buchanan’s ‘public choice theory’ of economics; known in some circles as ‘segregation economics’ of the deep south or simply eugenics of race and class.
The Atlantic did an article by Sam Tanenhaus in summer July August 2017 titled ‘The Architect of the Radical Right How the Nobel Prize–winning economist James M. Buchanan shaped today’s anti-government politics’
You don’t tolerate intolerance. Read a little about Mcinnes and his ilk. They are not interested in debate and will use the camoflague of societial norms to sow hate and discord. They do not want to build a better world, they want to be near the top of a dystopian fantasy world, no matter how much damage they do to the rest of us, including the ones commenting here in their favour.
I haven’t noticed anyone “…commenting here in their favour.”
There have, however, been many who have commented about the intolerance of the bien-pissants. who always sprout like pondweed and consume the oxygen.
But if you don’t tolerate intolerance, you then become intolerant.
Those intolerant of racists become, then, the equivalent of racists?
A slippery slope of equivalence, where all become equal; where the oppressed become the oppressors merely by dint of failing to tolerate their own oppression . . .
Holy moly! Imagine wishing your student son or daughter a good day at uni knowing they could confronting Proud Boys.
Shutting down the Proud Boys at uni is always a good day.
Even worse, imagine if they were unable to argue their PoV, having spent too long in ‘safe spaces’ and not enough in the real world.
Proud boys don’t “argue a PoV”, they fight. And as for needing safe spaces, these student went there to fight back, against both the police and the proud boys. Inspirational!
So neither side was capable of offering a PoV?
From your PoV.
Violence, gate, guns, other weapons and an insurrection. Arguing a point of view requires none of those things.
Oops, hate
Yes, imagine Adolf’s brownshirts being unable to argue their PoV. What would have happened then?
Given that they were banned for ten years prior to suddenly being the largest party in the Bundestag, we’ll never know.
Well, we know what they did when their PoV was not banned.
When their PoV was banned, they did not kill or brutalise or silence quite so many.
So, we have our answer . . . unless you’re saying that they only killed, brutalised and silenced because their PoV was once banned?
During that ten year ban who knows how many felt aggrieved that their rights had been curtailed. In the darkness of the sleep of Reason who knows what horrors are conjured.The prohibition of anything always results in a more severe manifestation when freed.
So, the poor petals took to the streets to firebomb Jewish homes and shops and murder people because they were aggrieved at not being able to incite violence for 10 years? That’s some rewrite of history you’ve got going on there.
What, did the Lutwaffe bomb London because they felt they were not being heard?
Maybe you could get your alternative history published?
Or what if you can’t get it published? Do you become one of the aggrieved mob who murders and destroys because you were not allowed to speak as freely as you wished?
You do know that Britain declared WAR on Germany in 1939?
The Blitz began a year later.
It began after the brilliant British Op Dynamoattack on then desparate evacuation and flight from Dunkirk.
And 340,000 were allowed to flee when they could have been obliterated entirely after their total rout. Try reading some real history, not the Boy’s Own Adventure version.
Might be time for yet another pen name.
‘…like me, middle-aged bearded bruisers in too much black.’
A neat thumbnail sketch, Guy.
I always look forward to Rundle’s forays to the USA, there are nuances in his reports which no TV cameras would capture.
well, I for one am glad there’s still a line of intolerance for intolerance that is too far even for Mr Rundle, even if that seems too much for some Crikey readers. Is this really the future for the left though, seemingly endless debate about where to draw the line in the Tolerance Paradox?
“line of tolerance for intolerance” of course… damn
Your meaning was clear from the context – typo. notwithstanding.
The Left doesn’t ‘do’ debate anymore – that’s too oldie mouldy and would require logical thought, another forgotten art.
The soi-disant ‘Left’ – self identified, self satisfied and semi-sentient.
Apparently the Left collect postage stamps, too.
One of the objectives of the right’s culture wars is to generate pointless and time consuming debates on the left about where “the line” is while they run off and pillage society.
See: Brandolini’s Law.