What was claimed
The Climate Council has received $41 billion in funding from the Australian government.
Our verdict
False. The Climate Council does not receive government funding. Its annual revenue is about $8 million.
There are claims the Australian government has given the Climate Council a staggering $41 billion of taxpayer money.
This is false. The Climate Council is a non-profit environmental advocacy group funded from public donations and philanthropy.
The council’s total annual income is about $8 million, less than 0.02% of the $41 billion figure cited in the claim.
The claim was made by Pat Mesiti, a former church pastor turned “income acceleration coach” and self-described “Australian icon”.
In a Facebook video posted on March 18, Mesiti listed several advocacy groups he claims received government funding, including the Climate Council.
“I didn’t realise the high cost of activism that governments actually spend. Do you realise that you right now, the people of Australia, are spending over $3 billion to climate change activism? … Do you realise that the Climate Council got awarded $41 billion?” (Video mark 1 minute 55 seconds).
To put the $41 billion figure in context, it equates to about three-quarters of Australia’s $53 billion defence budget and about 30% more than the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s entire funding allocation for 2023/24 (page 24).
The claim is disproved by looking at the Climate Council’s annual reports, which show the organisation’s total annual income is far less than Mesiti’s figure of $41 billion.
In 2022/23, the council reported revenue of $7,881,784 (page 43), while in 2021/22, its total income was $8,292,165 (page 43).
As a registered charity, the Climate Council is obligated to report its annual finances to the Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission.
Those financial reports show the majority of the organisation’s funding comes from donors and fundraising.
The council’s 2023 financial report, for example, shows $6.9 million of its $7.9 million total income (88%) was derived from donations (page 14).
A further $83,261 (1%) came from fundraising and $831,472 (10.5%) came from grants.
Amanda McKenzie, chief executive of the Climate Council, confirmed that the claim is false.
“The Climate Council is a proudly community-funded, independent organisation, and it has been from day one,” she told AAP FactCheck.
“We don’t receive government funding for core business, including producing research or undertaking analysis.”
She said that several years ago the independent government agency Arena supported a particular Climate Council program. However, this represented just 2% of the total income received by the organisation in that particular period.
Mesiti also claimed in the video the Yes campaign in the 2023 voice referendum was given $450 million in taxpayer funding (video mark 2 minutes 31 seconds).
Neither the Yes nor No campaigns received government funding.
Mesiti has previously made false claims related to the United Nation’s COP26 climate summit and federal Energy Minister Chris Bowen.
The verdict
The claim the Climate Council was awarded $41 billion by the federal government is false.
The climate advocacy organisation has an annual income of about $8 million, which is mostly derived from donations and fundraising.
False — The claim is inaccurate.
AAP FactCheck is an accredited member of the International Fact-Checking Network. To keep up with our latest fact checks, follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
So, if these things are exaggerated, how much of everything else saidxis exaggerated? Including the self-description of “Australian Icon.” Until reading this, I’d never heard of him before but then anybody who calls themselves a coach of anything outside of sport instantly gets the ‘snake oil’ mark from me.
The claim was made by Pat Mesiti, a former church pastor turned ‘income acceleration coach’ and self-described ‘Australian icon’.
That is the funniest sentence I had read for ages.
But a good Christian man wouldn’t lie, would he?
He sounds like one of the people that Jesus whipped out of the temple.
And looks like a spiv from a used car yard. I thought I’d seen him before
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z8IKyaFjWUE
A claim made by a virtually unknown self-described “Australian icon”……. this could buy him a couple of seconds of longed for fame?
No it’s not, it’s an outright stinking lie.