Chalk up another win to Petro? A fortnight
ago he told the House of Representatives that laws need to be changed to protect
journalists.
“Michael Harvey and Gerard McManus face possible imprisonment for refusing to
reveal the source of a story of significant public interest, a story which
posed no risk to national security, that is an appalling prospect in a
democratic nation,” he said.
Philip Ruddock’s people would like us to be
excited at the media release the Attorney slipped out on Friday heralding their
intervention in the case, saying moves are under way to offer limited protection
to reporters.
Well, whoopee-do, Philip. Who let the dogs
out?
We’d agree with the comments of Media
Entertainment and Arts Alliance secretary Chris Warren that the intervention holds out some hope to Harvey and McManus “that they
won’t face jail as a result of the ethical principal they’re upholding” and
that the Commonwealth “intends to pick up the recommendations of the Australian
Law Reform Commission and amend the Evidence Act to provide journalists in the
future with some protection for their professional privileges.”
But that doesn’t change the fact – this
action seems designed to cover the ars* of a notoriously dud minister.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.