Regarding Paul Sheahan’s contribution on Friday about the conduct of
Melbourne Cricket Club committee meetings, his claimed maximum tenure
of three elections
or nine years is wrong. After all, he has been on the committee since
the late 1980s.
He is correct when he says that “every year, three committee members, one of
the three vice-presidents and the president, have to be put up for
election” but is wrong to claim that there are “formal calls for nomination”.
I suppose he is playing semantics
here, but in reality there is no formal call for nominations. That is,
members are not written to individually and advised when nominations
close. There is no ad in the paper advising members about nominations.
Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.