Browny won our boardriders the day the riots came to Cronulla.
It was a peculiar and confounding time. Witnessing the events first-hand — the escalating week-long tension and the collective release of anger — was a bruising lesson in human nature. When I reflect upon it, I sense a grim inevitability to the riot; with so much passion, opinion and media focused on an unprepared suburb it could only end one way. It has now been five years since the riot and I still wonder: Why did it happen here? Could it happen again?
On Sunday the December 4, 2005 two teenage lifesavers were assaulted by a group of Middle Eastern boys on North Cronulla beach. The incident provoked an immediate backlash and plans were made for a protest the following Sunday. Information spread through word-of-mouth and text messages commanding “every f-cking Aussie” to “reclaim the beach” and “teach the wogs a lesson”.
Altercations and fights in Cronulla are common. Northies, the local pub, sees a dozen fights — white on white — each Friday and Saturday night. But the North Cronulla assault was different, and for three reasons: the perceived antagonists were Middle Eastern; the victims were lifesavers and hence considered icons and upholders of Australian values; and it occurred at the peak of the Howard-inspired rise of conservative values and indoctrinated fear of migrants.
The week leading up to the riot was highly charged. There is a dogged and proud ignorance in the Australian psyche and this was being shaken as people in Cronulla were forced to hold opinions on subjects they’d spent little time thinking. You couldn’t buy milk without engaging in a heated debate. The media circus had come to town and most people found that when you are “living” the issue it is far more complex than just reading about it.
I knew many people who intended to head down to the protest, some of them with high ideals. I spoke to a few friends who felt oppressed by political correctness and thought a protest would be an ideal opportunity to express their point of view. With the benefit of hindsight and knowing how the protest ended, it is easy to dismiss such thinking. Yet they were friends, they were well-meaning and they had considered their position.
In the early afternoon of Sunday December 11 I rode my pushbike to the end-of-year presentation for our boardriders club. On the way I took a detour through the crowd amassing at North Cronulla. The numbers were well above those predicted and there were no police in sight. Organisation had been loose and no one quite knew where to gather or what to do. Large groups of young men, bare-chested with flags draped over shoulders, walked the streets while sucking on beers. I continued to the presentation.
At approximately 3pm, just when Browny was accepting his pointscore trophy, the riots began.
At the time, a relationship had me spending a lot of time on the northern beaches and I often surfed at Curl Curl and Manly. Among some northside surfers I knew there was a tacit agreement that the riot was a good thing. People from Cronulla, and the Sutherland Shire in general, are often belittled for their perceived lack of cosmopolitan worldliness. But take geography out of the equation and surfers from Sydney’s northern beaches had more in common with their Cronulla counterparts than they would readily admit.
Two weeks after the riots, with Christmas gone and Cronulla still in lockdown I fled for the South Australian desert coast. For three weeks I traipsed between Coffin Bay and Cactus sharing campfires with surfers from all over Australia. As happens in such situations, pleasantries are exchanged and stories swapped. Each night someone in the circle would inevitably say, “you Cronulla guys really taught them wogs a lesson”.
It wasn’t just a “Shire thing” and it wasn’t just a “Sydney thing”, it wasn’t even just a “surfer thing”. The problem was far wider than that.
The fact that the riot happened at Cronulla may be as simple as access — it is the only city beach with a train line. The public transport route allows the residents of western Sydney, many from different racial backgrounds, to visit Cronulla. In summer it is one of the most ethnically diverse beaches in Australia and this leads to occasional bouts of racial tension.
There wasn’t much diversity that summer though. The riot and the subsequent reprisals were worldwide news and Cronulla, although safe with police on permanent patrol, wasn’t a nice place to visit. Olive branches were eventually extended from both sides and an intense period of cross-cultural promotion ensued.
I don’t believe that the riots could occur in Cronulla again and it’s not due to the aforementioned attempts at integration, which proved to be short-lived anyway. Lessons were learnt — harsh but practical — by many locals and, although existing attitudes may endure, they would be quick to recognise a repeat situation. I spoke to some who attended the protest yet were mortified when they became embroiled in a dispute that turned far more extreme than the one they signed up for.
Perhaps they still feel aggrieved and frustrated by political correctness and having their voices unheard? After all, things haven’t improved that much. Yet I vouch they will never attend another protest of that sort.
Personally, I found it alarming to see that during the last election both sides of government used the fear of boat people to advance their party. Political red herrings such as this show that the seeds of intolerance and fear are still readily spread despite the lessons of Cronulla.
Unfortunately, for many people such lessons are only learnt by experience. Which means that there are many more people in many more suburbs that could make the same mistake those at Cronulla did. As was shown, it doesn’t take much for a small, isolated incident to become a rallying point for a broader issue. And when it does, a seemingly harmless event can quickly spiral out of control.
Odd there’s no mention of the buildup to the buildup – the weeks, months years of abuse by the ‘icons’ of wogs visiting ‘a beach that was not theirs by rights. The rather feeble:
“The fact that the riot happened at Cronulla may be as simple as access — it is the only city beach with a train line. The public transport route allows the residents of western Sydney, many from different racial backgrounds, to visit Cronulla. In summer it is one of the most ethnically diverse beaches in Australia and this leads to occasional bouts of racial tension.”
is hardly an explanation of the motivation and circumstances of the initial assault on those iconic life savers. Or are we to assume it was habitual uncouth malevolent wog behaviour that didn’t need a reason to explode? The writer makes no attempt to give that first attack a detailed context so I can only assume very few of those taking part knew or cared what was really going on.
I probably have a duty to make some comments here Stuart. Thanks for the read.
My background – whitbread Warrnambool SLSC, 2 state titles junior surfboat crew, boardy as a teenager. Then I came to Sydney got involved in local council politics in Bondi. Helped stop the boredom riots of ’95 at Bondi beach ever repeating with Bondi Safety Committee as an elected Bondi ward councillor. (Interestingly Pav in the music pages of the Australian this week reminded me of it all as he was the promoter from memory.) I was a witness to the riot and saw how it hurt my community. And it had nothing to do with ethnics – it was all piss and sun and excess expectations in the action suburb probably.
So …. I believe you omit some things – Maroubra bought out of it totally. No support there. Bondi also – none. No doubt white bread north and south have cultural fraternity which is well and good but limited.
Context: So important. Every good surfer knows the conditions make the ride. So it is with your story – presumably run because Rake on abc tv Thursday night before ran this theme with a “devil” in a female Alan Jones shock jock role.
Which brings me to leadership context. Jones is a lickspittle for Howard. Abbott as protege promised to go surfing with a refugee before the election and broke his promise. Said the surf was too big – even in Rose Bay?
But let’s go down down to the nuts and bolts of community leadership: Every beach side councillor knows the underlying tension in society between active and passive recreation. Soccer or wog ball as it’s also known on the beach is not traditional here but soccer is the world game and we are very diverse population. And the argument with the assault of the surf patrol? Correct me if I am wrong but it was about property – and the use of that public property for active or passive recreation. Soccer versus sunbathing and sand castles. On a hot day that’s a serious diplomatic issue. At Bondi it’s been the long running saga of volleyball courts versus passive uses with voters on both sides.
In the regional beaches people may think this is made but in cities it’s chockers.
So I made sure in the wake of the Cronulla riot to blog with a view to the local worthies about the critical nature of local council diplomatic and serious planning work over active and passive uses of the beach not least for an emerging culture of beach soccer.
Which raises the question – what if there is a day when more people support beach soccer than surfing? In a democracy?
Okay sorry, that last question is provocative. Of course it’s a matter of negotiation and fairness. We are pretty good with fairness actually generally. We should hold on to that.,
And yes I personally believe that both racism and reverse racism back at skippys is an issue here, because it buggers up the communication over real issues. Trouble is Alan Jones types promoting multi racial monoculturalism, as if old England still rules the waves and always got it right. It seems to be code for white supremacism and the old days of imperial Britian. It’s the Republic. It’s hierarchy and tax free royals and their born to rule elites.
It’s a whole lot of sh*te.
Actually it’s a much bigger and more interesting world than the repressed Brits and we Aussies do well to transcend their god forsaken rainy isle also known as the ash tray of Europe for the degree of environmental damage to their countryside and over population.
I think the fact that the Howard Government was in power, demonising refugees and Muslims had a lot to do with the context of the riot at Cronulla. It may be just me, but there does not appear to be the same intensity of inter community hatred that there was in 2005. Maybe some of that community working together stuff worked? And the Gillard Government and their cocky mouthpieces like Alan Jones was for Howard are not quite as rabid and inflammatory. I still thing Alan Jones should have been given a harder time for his role in inciting and inflaming the Cronulla Riots.