Older Australians emerge as the most politically informed and most sceptical of media users, according to Essential Research’s polling of attitudes toward political coverage.
Interest in politics almost perfectly matches age, according to Essential’s data, with 18-24s and 25-34s having the lowest interest, before it rises with age so that 18% of over 65s follow politics “closely” and 59% “follow it enough to know what’s happening”. A little over 30% of 18-24-year-olds only pay attention when there’s an election, or have no interest whatsoever.
There’s also a big gender divide when it comes to interest in politics: men are much more likely to either follow politics closely, or enough to know what’s happening, than women, at 63-48%. Women (19%) are more than twice as likely as men (8%) to say they have no interest in politics.
Predictably, younger voters were most likely to rely more on online news services than traditional media. Half of 18-24-year-olds and 55% of 25-34-year-olds relied on online sources over broadcast and print media for political coverage, and that declined with age. Men were also much greater internet uses for political news than women. But income appeared to make no difference: voters in lower pay brackets (44%) were as likely as those on middle incomes (43%) to rely on the internet.
Older people also emerge as the most sceptical media consumers, trusting all forms of media less — often significantly — than other age groups. Even the most trusted media outlet, ABC TV, scores lower with older voters on “a lot of trust” than for younger voters, and “no trust at all” scores much higher among older voters. Even commercial radio, a medium traditionally associated with over-65s, scores lowest among them on “a lot of trust” or “some trust”.
And the medium they still use significantly more than younger voters, newspapers, scores poorly with its most loyal consumers — only 44% of older voters have some or a lot of trust in newspapers, compared to over half for all other demographics. Older people are even more likely than everyone else to feel the media fails to report in a balanced manner — 79% of older voters disagree, or disagree strongly, with “the media usually reports all sides of the story”.
The strongest response from voters obtained by Essential was on the issue of the media’s focus on personalities rather than policies. Around 70% of all voters agreed the media focused too much on the former and not enough on the latter, but older voters were particularly vehement on the issue — 90% of over-65s agree or strongly agree.
And among the big states, it is Queenslanders who stand out as the most sceptical of the media, consistently rating lower, and often much lower, on trust scores than NSW or Victoria. For example, only 42% of Queenslanders have any trust in newspapers, compared to 57% and 59% in NSW and Victoria
When it comes to bias, it is indeed in the eye of the beholder: Labor voters were nearly twice as likely to believe the media was biased in favour of the Liberals as all voters, and Liberal voters likewise about Labor bias, but men are also more likely than women to see bias, possibly reflecting their higher level of interest.

For example, only 42% of Queenslanders have any trust in newspapers, compared to 57% and 59% in NSW and Victoria.
I find that comforting, as all the big newspapers in Queensland are untrustworthy. There’s the Courier Mail, and then there’s the Australian, much in decline under Mitchell’s wingnut leadership. Both are Limited News. I’m not counting the Brisbane Times, which only exists online, and which reprints most of the content from the Age and the SMH.
These days, mum now buys the Sydney Morning Herald, and I don’t buy newspapers at all. If I want to find out what’s on with the world, I’ll point my browser at the Guardian.
“….18% of over 65s follow politics “closely” and 59% “follow it enough to know what’s happening”.
From my observations I reckon the truth of the matter is ‘59% “follow it enough to THINK THEY know what’s happening”.
I’m in a retirement village and most fellow residents seem to get their ‘politics’ from ACA and TT
@DAVID ALLEN – As a female in my mid 60’s I can assure you that ACA and TT are the last programs I’m likely to watch. Hope that gives you cause for some cheer! I hate Murdoch papers. In fact, I received one on Sunday by mistake,(I ordered Fairfax – I still criticise it but?) and hope it doesn’t happen again – it went in the bin!
I listen to ABC radio all day, and am most interested in the variety of topics discussed during a day. I learn heaps. Topics vary from eating dark chocolate to interviews about dementia or mental illness or premature births or Afghanistan and Iraq etc. I also read articles from around the world and love GreenLeft! I get disheartened by ABC TV and the too frequent practise of editorialising news items. I don’t want Juanita’s spin on the topic, I just want the facts! If the ABC wants to give an opinion, they should say so up front!
@ LIZ45 I’m a couple of years older than you, and female, but agree wholeheartedly with all your comments! I confess to being a politics/world affairs “tragic” for decades!! Once you live and/or travel extensively overseas, it seems natural to keep up with what is going on in other countries and compare them with what is happening here in Oz.
LIZ45 and CML, have you noticed how News Ltd has captured the ABC such that the worst opinion poll (Newspoll) is actually promoted on ABC TV News as if it is actual news? Meanwhile in The Australian newspaper (yesterday) an editorial bags the ABC News as if it is a bunch of incompetents. I don’t understand why the ABC allows itself to be captured like this? Surely they don’t NEED Newspoll?
Equally unsatisfactory is the way our Bernard, here at Crikey, promotes Essential as if it is essential to provide some meaningless, irrelevant statistics to be able to talk about politics. Rather than dumbing down it not-so-subtlely changes the language.