This column devotes an inordinate amount of time to publications giving free kicks to product. Yes, it gets repetitive, but just when we want to take a break, along comes the next egregious example.
A couple of weeks ago it was the Fairfax Sunday papers picking up FHM ‘s survey about the number of Australian men wanted to marry a virgin — the day before the latest edition of FHM hit stands.
Last night, Apple opened a modest store in Sydney. You might not have known about it. But The Sydney Morning Herald was determined that Mac not hide its light under a bushel.
Crikey reader Luke corralled the stories with the question “where is the news part in all this promotion?”:
- 19 June: “CBD chaos as Apple Store opens”, Stephen Hutcheon and Daniel Emerson, SMH
- 19 June: “Apple says the price is right”, Stephen Hutcheon, SMH
- 19 June: “Pom de tearaway: Brit’s dash to be Apple first”, Daniel Emerson, SMH
- 19 June: “iQueue: Apple will open to an international line-up”, Stephen Hutcheon, SMH
- 19 June: “The queue for the Apple Store starts here”, Asher Moses, SMH
- 18 June: “New Apple Store is a glass act”, Stephen Hutcheon, SMH
- 18 June: “Petite model perfects the art of exploiting Apple”, Stephen Hutcheon, SMH
- 9 June: “Shop and awe: Apple’s Australian retail debut”, Stephen Hutcheon, SMH
There’s video footage too:
In the 9 June story, Hutcheon even seems to tell Mac lovers what they’ll need to do to get their slice of the apple pie:
If you’re planning to pop in and check out the new Sydney Apple Store when it opens for business on Thursday next week, be prepared to wait in line. If you want to ensure you get in early, you might consider camping out overnight.
Capiche?
To be fair, Hutcheon did probe the question of whether Australians are paying too much for Apple product in comparison with international counterparts. But it was squashed by the sheer weight of puff.
Frippery like this: “Inside the store as zero hour approached, Apple Store staff faced the massive, 15m high glass atrium that frames the store and began singing, dancing an [sic] clapping … Although none of the first three in line bought anything, other’s [sic] behind them were not so frugal and soon after the doors were open Apple’s tills were ringing.” How Hillsongian.
Or the 2005 tale of model Isobella Jade who wrote her memoir in the New York Apple store, reheated so that SMH readers could be advised “when Apple’s Sydney Store opens on Thursday evening there will be ample opportunity for visitors to test the limits of Apple’s in-store hospitality.”
Or this: “The glass slabs come from Germany, the stone floor from Italy, the brushed stainless steel walls are from Japan, and the wooden tables are made from maple trees grown in Pennsylvania.”
Mmmm Pennsylvanian maple…
The Daily Telegraph was less eager to buy into the hype. Chloe Lake and Andrew Ramadge debriefed:
The lead-up to its opening, like the arrival of the iPhone, has been a carefully stage-managed affair dictated by Apple’s trademark media blackout and the whirlwind of rumours and misinformation that the strategy creates…With so many resources devoted to keeping the company’s projects secret, and just as many spent trying to guess their details, it’s easy to lose sight of the fact that the new Apple Store is, in fact, just a shop.
In other things, to answer your question Zoo Weekly , no we haven’t forgotten you — and your fantastic revamping of that 1950s fad: 3D glasses. Finally the technology is brought crashing into the noughties.
Hey Jane,
There is more news in the SMH coverage of the Apple store than in this “critique”. If there is evidence of a genuine “cash for comment” link between Apple and the publisher then publish it. Otherwise you would be better off analysing how incredible Apple’s branding strategy is. Whilst it is “in fact, just a shop”, how remarkable that they are able to affect people so deeply that they will camp out just to be one of the first through the doors.
Congratulations on ‘belling the Apple’. The smh’s coverage has been a joke… was it stiched up when Apple was negotiating some advertising space? otherwise its inexplicable. As for the people in the queue, i interviewed a couple the other day and they look silly enough to be dinkum but its amazing how many have the same type of collapsable chair… Apple could not possibly be funding these people could they!!
The Apple coverage comes a little over a week afer the SMH failed to even mention the international story of the people behind Mugabe despite it being on the wires and all over the Oz. Not one par for 2 days. Sadly the SMH has become a Sydney centric magazine rather than a newspaper… the irony is that John B Fairfax/ Brian McCarthy takeover is taking it further away from its once traditional values. The Oz despite its stable of right wing nutter columnists (Albrechtsen , Sheridan et al) and agenda journalists such as Shanahan and Milne is a much better paper .
Crikey publishes an article unfavourable to Apple? Lese Majeste! Hordes of Apple fans will descend on you, and you’ll probably get slashdotted.