Yesterday’s news of a fall in retail sales in NSW in the September quarter, in contrast to growth (albeit weak) everywhere else, again points to the extraordinarily serious problems the NSW economy currently faces.
If there is a single factor that will drag Australia into an official recession, it will be the NSW economy, which is already shedding jobs and must surely be on the cusp of negative growth.
In particular, there are significant emerging employment losses occurring in suburban Sydney.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ labour force data for October provides a breakdown of job growth and losses according to region. In the year to October, there were 20 regions across the country where employment fell. Nearly half were regional and rural areas.
But a staggering eight of the 20 areas were in suburban Sydney. They included an 18,000 drop in jobs in outer-western Sydney. While there were small job losses in some parts of other capitals, nowhere else showed a consistent fall in employment across most of a major metropolitan area.
Retail accounted for part of the fall — in the year to August, full-time retail employment in NSW fell, with no corresponding growth in part-time employment. Jobs in manufacturing in NSW also disappeared in that period, both full-time and part-time.
Across NSW, overall job growth was an anaemic 27,000 in the year to October. And the problems in Sydney are thrown into relief by the fact that areas linked to resources — the Illawarra, Newcastle and the Hunter — grew strongly. Employment briefly peaked above 3.4m in the early part of the year, but by October had slid back below that level. In Victoria, jobs grew by 33,000, in Queensland by 66,000 and WA by 59,000.
In NSW, it will be a case of a slowdown coming on top of the impressively disastrous efforts of the NSW Labor Government. And given the size of NSW, it means it will be difficult for the rest of the country to avoid being dragged down. NSW doesn’t function in isolation from the rest of the economy, any more than Australia’s does from the world.
The only short-term fix in NSW would appear to be the removal of the current Government as a way of bolstering consumer confidence and convincing businesses that the bad times are over. Clearly, waiting until 2010 for this isn’t acceptable from an economic point of view.
Other labour force data suggests that business across the country have already started cutting back on their employees’ hours, without actually shedding jobs. In the year to October, the numbers of workers working less than 39 hours a week increased significantly, while the average number of hours worked remained steady or decreased slightly. This seems to have occurred particularly in manufacturing, where the numbers working less than 40 hours a week lifted in the middle of this year and the numbers doing overtime dropped.
Most disconcertingly, while October is traditionally a slow labour month (school holidays, pre-Christmas lull), Australians worked on average fewer hours in October 2008 than in any other month since records began, excluding the traditional January break.
The upside of this data is that it suggests employers in areas like manufacturing that are directly exposed the downturn and credit crunch are preferring to drop staff down to fewer hours rather than retrench them. This will soften the descent into unemployment, giving more time for the Government’s stimulus package and the RBA’s rate cuts to start working. The construction industry, which now employs more than 800,000 people, was still growing August, even in NSW (although not in Victoria), although it may have taken a hit in the last three months.
That still leaves the problem of NSW and its wretched government. It’s not just an economic problem, it’s a political problem as well for Kevin Rudd. Retaining government will be difficult in 2010 if suburban Sydney is mired in high unemployment.
Another bias article by a biased righter [sic]. Bernard Keane suggests that the short term fix for NSW is an abandonment of the democratic process of electing governments for fixed terms and replacing that with an election whenever a government becomes unpopular. What a practical and well thought out solution Bern. But what are the libs offering us exactly? Put some cards on the table eh? I am betting that we will get new native vegetation laws that lead to wholesale clearing, that will be really good for us all won’t it, and what about power stations? Sold as well, we all dislike our current labour pollutions but what are we replacing them with? Sooner or later we will have to know this and if it happens after the election it will be too late.
Leave the “do us all a favour and quit” line for the retards at limited news bern and do us all a favour and propose some practical solutions or at least expose exactly how the opposition will help the situation.
Well said Rob. Democracy anyone?
This article completely misreads the NSW dynamic in some important ways. About 20 goose MPs in the ALP Right are cranky with Rees for dumping Stewart MP from cabinet. These were the folks who built the poor polling the govt are in now. So Rees is cutting a new track away from their nepotistic ways. That’s encouraging.
2. He’s tough. Contradicting a minister to her face in front of the press gallery to be more professional in her language, even if talk of developers seeking favours.
3. so far he communicates with cut through. The brothel – 1.5 out of 10 scale of issue given the malice and motives and weak factual basis of the front page story. Good call, champ.
4. it’s the tabloid editor who got the shove not Rees this last 4 days. That’s significant.
5. Rudd owes Rees backers for the Your Rights at Work federal election victory in many ways let alone the leadership. It’s all part of the same machine.
6. as confirmed by phone with Imre Salusinszky yesterday, everyone might expect Rudd to go before end of 2010, but technically he can go by April 2011. And under the NSW constitution if there is a clash Rees can bring his state to the polls first. So the sabre rattling about NSW electorally is a bit hollow.
7. Ridout is changing her story by the interview. Is NSW 30% of the national economy? Is it 33%? Is it 25% as one wonk suggested last week? It sort of matters. Gittins has also moderated his critique.
8. Kennett is leading in The Oz p1 about how he can slash and burn and do a Victoria 1990ies in 5 years here in NSW. So let’s get this straight – $B’s of windfall profit like Vic energy selloff AFTER the GFC? It’s a fairytale.
9. Keating whines about Robertson MP to anyone who will listen, but he couldn’t tell the difference in the SMH between a 1997 sell off proposal with $10B of transmission assets included and 2007 without. Only a fool would say that wildly reckless accounting by PK was unrelated to Lazard Carnegie Wylie
Err just to clarify my ambiguity, I meant democracy is important. Didn’t mean attack on Bernard as a “biased rigther” as such. I just disagree with him about 4 year terms.
There is no doubt many would like to junk the 4 year reform, not least the culture of grievance being promoted by the energy sale big media, but I think they would be wiser to campaign for a constitutional mechanism of a recall like California if they really want to, with say 5-10% of the voters petition.
Even then I think they should watch Enron:Smartest Guys in the Room before they get too excited about a recall – screen jockeys screwed Governor Davis with manufactured brown outs and black outs, gouged outrageous fees and forced a recall, thank you free market! And Enron still went bankrupt in a cloud of corruption. Now big Arnie is Governor and it’s looking like 1994 in Jannali. By the by those bushfires over there remind me of two movies Chinatown (about LA in a desert, water politics) and Against All Odds (clunky movie with Rachel Ward Jeff Bridges developer subplot to build on ridge topped canyons perfect for … wildfire.
Now the NSW “mischief” has shifted to page 3 of The Australian and how. Sanchez has put a slippery rug under Police Minister Kelly in turn an ALP Right substitute for ex Minister aka Naked Dancer. While Rees’s amigo Robertson MP, Rudd backer, cools his heals. This time it may be Premier’s Office “mischief” (?) in blowback against rabble Trogs chipping his mini budget. He’s tough is this Rees guy. Crash or crash through style, so far so good. 2 years and counting.
It could be our own internet election here in NSW sidelining the big press. Crikey might need to open a NSW satellite.
Watching N.S.W. from afar, as I am, I can say one thing to Bernard Keane. Until the gang of 20 who support Tony Stewart decide that their mate is more important than a ministerial car, a private secretary and an office that has air conditioning and a flat screen t.v. and decide to kick themselves out of office by voting with the libs in a vote of no confidence then the A.L.P. will stay in power…at least until 2011. And going on the opposition, who flounder around during question time with an incompetency that’s radiant, there’s a good chance they’ll get another term.