Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.
comments-section
Subscribe
Please sign in to comment
21 Comments
Most voted
NewestOldest
Inline feedbacks
View all comments
skink
13 years ago
what is a ‘surplus fetishist?’
is it similar to a ‘cassock fetishist?’
are you going to get a letter from Cardinal Pell’s lawyers?
SBH
13 years ago
‘Surplice’ Skink (unless thats’ been dealt with a dash no. 2)
Am I the only person in Oz who thinks the budget hasn’t directly affected me? Perhaps that may be a good thing.
Swannie should put a Great Big New Tax on apostrophes then people would think twice before using them.
drmick
13 years ago
So we can expect Mr Lumpy Lardclacker to make a meal of his reply, and then eat it in front of the starving poor; Then tell the poor, (and the world), that the poor are the problem, and this gumment is pandering to these poor people just to get their votes. “There is no way we will be looking after the poor” he said.
We nearly died laughing when Lumpys leader declared that the gumment was manipulating the press.
wpDiscuz
Send to their inbox
No cartoon today, time for some serious budgetary analysis
what is a ‘surplus fetishist?’
is it similar to a ‘cassock fetishist?’
are you going to get a letter from Cardinal Pell’s lawyers?
‘Surplice’ Skink (unless thats’ been dealt with a dash no. 2)
Love the brains, doggie.
Am I the only person in Oz who thinks the budget hasn’t directly affected me? Perhaps that may be a good thing.
Swannie should put a Great Big New Tax on apostrophes then people would think twice before using them.
So we can expect Mr Lumpy Lardclacker to make a meal of his reply, and then eat it in front of the starving poor; Then tell the poor, (and the world), that the poor are the problem, and this gumment is pandering to these poor people just to get their votes. “There is no way we will be looking after the poor” he said.
We nearly died laughing when Lumpys leader declared that the gumment was manipulating the press.