The once-thriving sport that rode on Greg Norman’s coat-tails through the 1980s and 90s, that used to proudly boast about its huge participation numbers, that once featured a dozen or more professional tournaments each summer, is in disarray.
The departure this week of Golf Australia’s chief executive Tony Hallam, 18 months before his contract was due to expire, has resulted in a raft of recriminations and bickering, and confirmed the suspicion that golf has become the red-headed stepchild of Australian sport.
So dire is the situation that the Australian Open, once described as the “fifth major” because it routinely attracted players of the calibre of Jack Nicklaus, Gary Player and Arnold Palmer each year, is without a major sponsor and, according to some, in danger of not going ahead this December. For the first time (wars aside) since 1904.
The Australian Women’s Open is also looking for a major sponsor. The Australian Masters, a fixture on the calendar at Huntingdale for the past 30 years, this year lost Mastercard as its main backer and its future, too, is under a cloud.
At a time when local players are prospering on the world scene like never before – Australians comprise the largest non-American contingent on the US PGA Tour, two Australians (Adam Scott and Geoff Ogilvy) are ranked in the world’s top five players, and 10 are in the top 70 — the state of the local scene which spawned them is dire.
Hallam was recruited with much fanfare in 2005 from PricewaterhouseCoopers where he was a partner. He came into the job with great enthusiasm and high hopes for turning around an increasingly dysfunctional sport. But now he, too, has gone, defeated by the magnitude of the task.
His critics say he tried to bulldoze through reform without proper consultation, and did not listen to those who’d spent most of their working life in the industry. They point to a blowout in staff hirings as he desperately sought new ways to increase revenue. They also claim recent asset sales have done nothing to help the long-term cause of GA.
Hallam still has three weeks to serve before he leaves the GA offices. While he hinted at imminent sponsorship announcements, Hallam told Crikey he did not want to make any detailed comment until after he had departed.
What he did say, though, is that those who run the inherently conservative sport needed to learn to embrace change.
“The challenge for golf is to go ahead in leaps and bounds in the same way that soccer, cricket and AFL have done in the past few years, otherwise we’ll get left behind,” he said.
If the women’s Open does find a major sponsor, it is slated to play at two of Australia’s best courses in the next two years — Metropolitan and then the composite course at Royal Melbourne — in what would be a major triumph for the women’s game in this country.
The men’s Open is listed next year for New South Wales Golf Club — perhaps the most scenic course in Australia, and one that would provide great pictures for television — but it, too, needs a major backer.
Finding the money is the hard part. And what makes the situation even more worrying is that a finance wiz from the top end of town, someone who supposedly had a great network of contacts in business, has come up empty-handed. If he can’t make it work, who can?
Charlie, Charlie you are on a hiding to nowhere with this article for the following reasons; I am a consultant to several golf companies and private and semi private golf clubs in Australia and the US. I am also, sadly, just an average golfer. The sport, certainly GA and most clubs are run by golf enthusiasts and Hon Pres. Hon. Capt and years ago Hon.Sec, the latter was replaced by the GM or CEO – salary range 100K-250K+. The old guard versus the “professional managers” was never going to work. Turgid and moribund versus hype and grand vision. You quote Hallam above as “The challenge for golf is to go ahead in leaps and bounds in the same way that soccer, cricket and AFL have done in the past few years, otherwise we’ll get left behind,” he said” DUH! But HOW MR Hallam? A Happy Gilmour or an R&A model? Why quote the man if he offers no solution for his rather obvious statement? The reason for the decline in participation is simple – TIME. The majority of those who can afford to and want to play don’t have the time to invest the minimum 8 hours a round of golf takes; 4hrs15 to play 18 holes, at least an hour and a half to get there and get ready to hit off and another hour and a half to clean up, have a drink and drive home. So much for Saturday or Sunday. Get the drift? As for the Australian Tour, as much as I like golf I would rather watch Woods, Scott et al playing Augusta or Torey Pines (for a limited time) than watch three marquee names and 153 journeymen pros play in Australia and I don’t think I am alone. I could go on but it’s a little redundant, so Chas, when next you write about golf, do a little research and get some facts and don’t just regurgitate the canned message that you are supplied. In the dark and mushrooms comes to mind ….
Something is seriously wrong with the whole golfing business in Australia.
In Cairns, we’ve lost one wonderful golf course to the developers – apparently there is no “zoning” that actually protects a golf course from the greedy class. Dozens were sold “fairway frontage” homes, only now to find themselves with three story condos jammed up on their garden boundary. And now Cairns’ Paradise Palms, one of Australia’s “Top 10 Golf Courses” is being cut up by Tom Hedley, who has spent most of his time building prison-tower-looking condos in the Cairns CBD, completely destroying any semblance of tropical city. Cairns former Mayor Kevin Byrne is complicit in this golf course destruction, and the golfing community seems to have little to say about it.
Golf courses in Europe, the US, and even Japan have histories going back over 100 years and are revered as open space – here they are just so much ground to jam more houses and unit blocks into.
It’s always stunned me as a migrant to this wonderful country that, despite 95% of your land being unoccupied you insist on building giant houses on tiny pieces of land, with narrow roads linking them all together. Not much for planning are the Australians, apparently.
Could Charles Happell please explain what he means by “the red-headed stepchild of Australian sport “?
Regards
Gerry Cahir (a redhead)
After reading Charles Happell’s piece yesterday where he condoned grievous bodily harm and relocated the site of Olympic Pool in Beijing knowing nothing about golf I am unsure how much of the above is either ill informed or inaccurate or both.