The risk level on coal investment has stepped up significantly with the announcement of a historic climate pact between the world’s two largest greenhouse gas emitters, the United States and China.
For a long time investors have placed their bets on the basis that, for all the talk, the world’s leaders would do nothing about climate change. Quite suddenly, those bets are less safe.
A quarter to a third of Australia’s coal mines are already losing money at current prices, and only a weakening dollar is putting a floor under the industry’s prospects. Growth in demand for Australia’s coal exports is going to be increasingly hard to come across, and the coal industry, battling to get costs down, is no longer in a position to spend the billions needed to develop new, competitive low-emissions technology. In any event, “clean coal” technology like carbon capture remains the same pipe dream it’s been for a decade or more.
Any serious climate action is bad news for thermal coal used for power generation. And China is serious: yesterday’s announcement follows shock restrictions and tariffs on coal imports imposed over the last two months. What if China’s coal consumption really does peak this decade? India’s coal consumption will double, but most of that will be mined locally — last night the country’s energy minister said he would eliminate coal imports within three years.
Australia can try to be free rider on climate action, but we won’t escape the impact on the world’s most emissions-intensive power source. The scenarios in which coal has a “big future”, as Tony Abbott claims, are now getting very hard to see.
Yes, China recently moved to impose tariffs on coal imports, but the upcoming free trade agreement with Australia promises to remove them again e.g. smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/the-six-main-benefits-from-a-free-trade-agreement-with-china-20141111-11kkh9.html
So where does this leave the increasingly ironically named Abbot Point development?
When will Crikey and its acolytes look at what such decisions actually mean? International coal consumption is going to continue increasing until at a long off point the planet’s Governments might make a meaningful decision about fossil fuel consumption, but right now it’s still full steam ahead.
No Australian Government of any variety will have VOTER support for actions which disadvantage us in the present and have extremely dubious longer-term benefits anyway.
Wrong, Norman – the game is finally coming to an end!
ANY Australian government from now on will be forced to do something significant about global warming or risk becoming an international pariah.
The bogans (VOTERS) will need to get the message!!
Wait for some genius with a black (sic!) hole of coal to suggest the disinterment of the Fischer-Tropsch process by which the Nazis fuelled their tanks & trucks (saving real petrol/kerosene for the Luftwaffe). There is a good argument that it was the separation of the fuel in the sub-zero temperatures on the Eastern Front that did most to save Russia.
It costs a fortune, is orders of magnitude more filthy than even Victoria’s brown ‘coal’ obsceneties but, hey… so much has been invested and think of the jobs!
Should be a winner for tory & nats alike, being such economic (ir)rationalists.