It seemed inevitable, and in the end it took less than five months to happen: Tasmanian Senator Jacqui Lambie has left the Palmer United Party.
In July, Clive Palmer bestrode Australian politics. His bloc of four Senate votes gave him huge power to determine whether the government’s agenda was implemented or not. His polling was consistently strong, suggesting voters enjoyed his ostentatious style. He effortlessly set the political agenda, with a quip here, an insult there, always moving on to another theatrical announcement.
Back then, Crikey suggested Palmer might burn out and his party might fracture — and that’s exactly what’s happened, albeit more quickly than anyone expected. Before the year has finished, the PUP languishes in the polls even in Queensland, Palmer’s voting bloc is down to three — and perhaps not even that, depending on Victorian Senator Ricky Muir’s mood — and Palmer appears to have run out of stunts.
As for Lambie, she now faces a far more difficult environment, in which she will become a key vote for every single bill contested between the major parties and the Greens, pursued endlessly by the government, the opposition, lobbyists and industry groups.
Some politicians, like Nick Xenophon, cope successfully with this workload and attention. Others, like Steve Fielding, never do. Lambie proposes that the interests of Tasmanians will be her guide — giving voice to the quaint notion that what was intended to be “the states’ house” should indeed be used thus. If Lambie can free herself from the urge to regularly offer a Hansonesque commentary on race and religious relations in Australia, her role in Australian politics could become as significant as that of Brian Harradine, another Tasmanian independent.
re your editorial, there is one big difference between brian harradine, harradine was labor with catholic conservative social values and had brains aplenty, Lambie has none of these
there is no comparison between the 2
cairns50 is wrong about Harradine being “labor”. He was a senior D.L.P. figure in S.A. before being moved to Tasmania to take over the Tasmanian Trades and Labour Council through the N.C.C’s control of small unions which represented a minority of workers but had a majority of delegates.
Brian was, however, much smarter than Lambie, and had the good fortune to be made a martyr in the eyes of many Tasmanians because of the gross incompetence of the Tasmanian A.L.P. Left. Lambie won’t have that sort of aura.
Lambie may have a good chance for re-election due to the fact that she’s neither ALP nor LNP. The electorate will see that as a positive attribute.
Crikey says: Lambie could be the next Harradine, Wrong: Lambie WILL be the next Harradine.
She has street smarts and has six years to further hone those skills. Furthermore she will outrank and outlast Erika Betts in political manoeuvring.
She doesn’t seem stupid to me – just ignorant and over confident. Those characteristics can be changed.