Refugee advocates say the crisis at the Manus Island processing centre continues today, with hundreds of detainees still on hunger strike, while others have been rounded up and interrogated — some say tortured — to identify the ringleaders of the week-long protest. They say drinking water has been withheld from detainees.
But new Immigration Minister Peter Dutton says the situation is under control. In media reports this morning Dutton dismissed claims about food and water being withheld as “complete rubbish” and reprimanded the media for reporting them.
So who is correct? Unless the detainees involved can provide clear video evidence — an expectation that is unreasonable in the circumstances — we may never know for certain. The Manus detention centre is on a remote island off the coast of another country, which has the ability to restrict access to foreign journalists.
Bernard Keane argues today that offshore processing can be humane, if done correctly. I disagree. We need checks and balances on this high-stakes, billion-dollar industry. Offshore processing can never be transparent because it is, by definition, out of bounds for Australian journalists — our media are subject to the laws of a foreign government when reporting on it.
The Australian media must have access to Australian refugee processing centres — and the best way to ensure that access is to process asylum seekers here in Australia.
Marni Cordell
Editor
thank you marni for your editiorial
i agree with your thoughts 100%
no refugees picked up by aust authorities should ever be send to another foreign country for processing or re settlement
Dutton! If he told me the time I’d still check my watch.
Offshore processing exists specifically to protect Australia from becoming hostage to legal action under the refugee convention. The moment an asylum seeker sets foot in Australia, he or she has many more legal avenues available than if kept offshore.
It has nothing to do with media access.
David – you’ve just said that offshore processing exists to prevent asylum seekers from exercising rights *that they are guaranteed under an international convention that Australia is a signatory to!* Or to put it another way, it is to allow the Australian government to avoid its responsibilities under international law.
Restricting media access certainly helps though.
It is great to read someone taking responsibility for an editorial.