It’s a most convenient case of good timing: barely a week after the head of Parliament’s Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security called for Australia to start bombing Islamic State militants in Syria, we have learnt via a report in the government’s favoured media outlet that the United States has asked Australia provide greater support to air operations in Iraq, including flying into Syria. Clearly the Abbott government is anxious to ramp up its military operations against Islamic State.
The air campaign against IS has been underway for 12 months and has had little effect: IS has expanded the territory it controls in both Iraq and Syria. US military figures say IS has been able to entirely replace the forces killed by airstrikes with foreign volunteers, who are allowed to cross into Syria from Turkey by the Turkish government.
The group continues its nauseating, theatrical brutality: its beheading this week of elderly Palmyra scholar Khaled al-Asaad is of a piece with its murder and rape campaigns across Syria and Iraq. But for every victim of IS’ savagery, the Assad regime kills a score or more. Just last Sunday, the regime launched airstrikes on the opposition-held Damascus suburb of Douma, slaughtering over 100 people. IS is capable of individual incidents of barbarism, but the Assad regime can inflict it with industrial efficiency. And it was that brutality that sparked the first wave of foreign fighters to travel from the West to join opposition forces, including radical Islamist groups, in 2012.
Extending the military campaign against IS while the Assad regime remains in power and engaged in a war with its own people will simply perpetuate the chaos and brutality that marks Syria and much of Iraq. The West can’t bomb and shoot its way to victory in the region: there must be a political solution that involves dealing with a regime hellbent on exterminating its own people.
Funny about the timing?
A profoundly ill-informed editorial. Are you completely unfamiliar with the true origins of IS? Does it occur to you to question the western narrative on the Syrian government’s actions? Have you the least idea about concepts of international law and the restraints imposed by Art. 51 of the UN Charter? Are we to rush headlong into yet another American inspired fiasco to save Abbott’s job?
With impeccable timing as always, captain courageous delves deeper into the u winnable turmoil of the Middle East. Some at my local are saying that at least with the coalition of the *willing* and their bombing of the ISIS militant, no civilians are ever killed. There was a cynic at my local who said *that’s only because civilian casualties are not reported when we bomb*, only when the other side bombs civilian casualties are counted.
Coalition of the *willing or killing*
Unwinnable turmoil of the Middle East.
Coalescing of the Shilling.