On the environment
Meredith Williams writes: RE: “Turnbull’s vision for 2018: basically 2016, with a dash of 2008” Our MT PM, hellbent on leading us backwards, has declared that the Coalition stands for cheaper energy. I suppose the money we save can go towards the earth’s funeral.
Geoff Edwards writes: Shame on you, Bernard Keane, for parrotting the nuclear industry’s alternative fact that nuclear reactors have “zero carbon emissions”. Sure, they produce relatively few emissions while running, but they incur huge carbon debits during construction in the form of cement, copper, steel and other materials not to mention the diesel fuel consumed during mining and processing uranium ore. One (contested) estimate is that it takes seven years of operation to recover the energy consumed in construction. Further, they will incur huge carbon debits during decommissioning. The carbon balance sheet for the industry is controversial among scholars, partly because nobody knows how much conventional petroleum and electricity will be required to bury the things after they are retired from service, because this has been rarely completed.
A colossal carbon debt is being stockpiled around the world on account of ageing and obsolete reactors which have yet to be rendered safe. Let us not underestimate the geographic, fiscal and carbon challenge in that process: Australia, with a million square miles of desert, has yet to build a secure repository even for its own medical waste.
On Trump and Turnbull
Jock Webb writes: Re “Turnbull’s Trump silence“: Dean Ellis raises some interesting points. Trump and Hitler have much in common with self important strutting, deep paranoia about criticism, extreme racist views and the need to have sycophants around him at all times. Not to mention the tantrums. I wonder if Bannon is not Heinrich Himmler however? Well today Trunbull had a nasty lesson when the white House obfuscated about the refugee deal and relaxed unpleasant comment regarding the phone call. This is inexcusable and we need to immediately rethink every aspect of our relationship and perhaps tear up the USFTA which has cost us billions, especially in the PBS (see Ian Verrender at ABC news.). You cannot deal with Trump, he is a crook.
On political donations
John Richardson writes: Re: “Turnbull says only multimillionaires like him, not grassroots groups like GetUp, should buy political influence“. So, poor Malcontent Malcolm has suggested that foreign donations to political parties and activist groups should be banned and that only Australians & Australian businesses should be able to influence Australian elections via political parties, groups, associations or unions. While he’s busy tidying-up the local political stage, perhaps Malcolm could find room on his list of unwanted influencers for the Vatican, the White House & the Internet, along with the “Mad Monk” and that well-known American political spoiler, the Sun King Rupert Murdoch?
Thanks for the enlightening detail on the Trumble phone conversation. One can only hope that our fearless PM said something along the lines of: “Now Don, while we’re talking about dumb deals, can we discuss the flying toasters, sorry I mean F-35s? We might need to do some extreme vetting on that. Sad!”. Silly me, I just remembered it’s Maladroit we’re talking about, it would have all been “yes sir, no sir”.
Geoff Edwards implies that we must naturally use carbon to create cement, copper, steel and during mining and processing of uranium ore. However we can do all of those things with non-carbon electricity. Continuing to use fossil carbon is killing millions of people annually from bronchitis alone, while (newfangled) radioactivity is killing no one at all.
Stop trying to scare us about radioactivity please. It distracts the public from the threat of global warming.
Sick Politics.
Surely, Brexit, Trump, One Nation, Senate voting patterns, etc, etc, can help Messrs Turnbull and Shorten and their cabinets to see that very many people, myself included, are totally fed up with the two major Parties prancing about in Parliament and the Media confecting pseudo-opposition to every single political proposition.
Everyone knows there are many ways of cooking a chook.Proposing to cook one does not require us all to witness a pseudo fight about how to do it.
Surely what is needed for the good of the country (and for the future of their Parties) is an occasional meeting of the minds? The current perpetual two-party bunfight is helping no-one.
For starters, why do they not jointly decide to bring the unfortunate people on Manus and Nauru back to Australia for processing and where justified for permanent settlement?
Then they might jointly agree a way forward for cutting Australia’s carbon emissions and providing its population with reliable renewable energy into the future?
Happy days,
Bill Castleden