Even as Malcolm Turnbull and his ministers warn against the rising tide of protectionism, his government is rapidly becoming the most protectionist since the Fraser era, with the way being prepared to hand a $900 million concessional loan to the corrupt, tax-dodging Indian company Adani for its unviable Carmichael coal mine project.
The cheap loan to fund the rail line needed to connect the mine with port facilities would come from the government’s National Party boondoggle fund, the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility, which lacks even the most basic accountability mechanisms and has minimal staff. There would be no assessment role for Infrastructure Australia, which is expressly designed to assess major infrastructure projects on a national and regional basis, and certainly no role for a body like the Productivity Commission.
Turnbull claims the project will create “tens of thousands of jobs”, which even The Australian pointed out was wrong. The company itself has admitted the mine and rail project would create less than 1500 jobs, while the Queensland Resources Council has suggested 2400 jobs.
Even accepting Turnbull’s fictional claim that 20,000 jobs would be created by the Carmichael project, the loan would amount to a cost of $45,000 per job — three or four times what we used to spend a year keeping automotive workers employed, and with no guarantee of repayment even at the lower interest rate that Adani apparently needs to make the project viable. In reality, the loan is likely to support 1500 jobs at a cost of $600,000 each.
For that amount, it’d be cheaper to give every family in Townsville an interest-free loan of $10,000 and tell them to do what they want with it.
[Do politicians care about the cost of infrastructure promises?]
According to Infrastructure Australia, the highest priority infrastructure projects in the country — some of which are funded, some of which are not — are all in urban areas: mostly road and rail projects, and the western Sydney airport. The highest priority initiatives (that is, projects that don’t yet have a business case) are nearly all urban road and rail projects too, many of which will deliver major economic and productivity benefits in terms of reduced travel time in major cities, as well as jobs. One high priority project, the WestConnex project in Sydney, for example, which has received a $1.5 billion grant and a $2 billion loan from the federal government, will, by itself, generate 10,000 construction jobs over a decade before any economic benefits from its operation.
To his credit, Malcolm Turnbull has abandoned the Coalition’s long antipathy toward urban infrastructure investment and is genuinely committed to public transport. But the Adani loan would be straight from an older Coalition playbook — regional, without economic merit, and intended to benefit the fossil fuel industry.
As with most other forms of protectionism, Labor is on board: the Palaszczuk government has bent over backwards to fund and clear hurdles for Adani and supports the loan. But unusually, Bill Shorten, until recently a supporter of the project, has now expressed reservations about it, as has LNP backbencher Bert Van Manen, from the southern Queensland suburban electorate of Forde.
Shorten may have picked up on the extraordinary contrast between a government handing nearly a billion dollars to a foreign company to export coal, and the death of the Great Barrier Reef from warming sea waters. The government may think it is increasing its chances of regaining, and keeping, northern Queensland seats with the loan, but as the death of an Australian icon becomes more apparent, this dodgy loan might end up being a political dead-weight on an already overburdened government.
Why should we pander (our taxes)?
Surely they’d have a lazy billion or so, themselves, socked away up some hollowed-out palm tree in The Caymans or similar “Rainy Day Bank”?
…. Or are they too busy, hollowing out more “storage”?
not merely a bad business decision, but a crime against humanity #turdball #stopadani #waterislife
I glanced at the front page of the Australian this morning in the supermarket with its usual partisan attack on Bill Shorten for opposing the Carmichael mine (I hope it’s true).
I don’t think it’s a negative for Bill Shorten. I think it’s very much a positive. I used to sort of like Malcolm Turnbull a long time ago. He’s been an enormous disappointment.
As an old white male, the only thing nowadays that will change my vote is the environment. Everything else is just politics.
Spot on. Turnbull is catering to the minority of climate change loons like Bernardi Abbott and the unspeakably awful and ridiculous Malcolm Roberts. Is it good politics to turn your back on not just the planet but the vast bulk of the Australian politician?
Maybe in some universe.
It makes no sense to further endanger the Great Barrier Reef and kill off the 60,000 associated tourism jobs for the prospect of 1500 Adani jobs.
So why is our government even considering such lunacy? Note to Trumble: it is not possible to purchase a replacement reef, money cannot buy everything.
Oh, but Malcolm claims “tens of thousands of jobs”.
If that is truly the case then Adani surely wouldn’t mind guaranteeing that number of jobs for the life of the project in return for the loan.
Malcolm’s hobby is to turn bull into ‘facts’.
Tens of thousands of jobs is a lie, not an error just a bare-faced lie. What are our politicians thinking of? That it is appropriate to obtain whatever it is they want by deceit? John Howard told us that we were invading Iraq because of their weapons of mass destruction – a bare faced lie that has cost the world thousands of lives and billions of dollars. Turnbull is justifying environmental devastation with false claims of benefit to the unemployed. This has to stop. Powerful people must be severely punished for lying.
It’d be cheaper if those Townsville households didn’t get charged any taxes. That napkin math shows that a good chunk of their income tax is going to pay for an expensive project that will only result in Adani paying no taxes when they have to write it down. Townsville paid taxes so Adani doesn’t have to.
This is a good example of how the Commonwealth of Australia and her colonial states are not yours, it belongs to the rich and powerful, who are all on welfare and live a life of no labour.
I found an idea we could try from France, looks promising https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillotine
The guillotine is a bit harsh, but there should be a set of stocks within 200m (easy dragging distance) of every parliament in the land…
No, the reason they used the Guillotine was to prevent them coming back into politics and causing more trouble. You can see from Pauline Hanson the trouble with returning politicians.