You can understand why the government is in a rush to try to get its Gonski 2.0 package through the Senate: the longer debate about it goes on, the longer rentseekers like the Catholic education sector and the Australian Education Union have to stir up both the left and the right against the package.
But much like when Labor re-embraced offshore processing in government, thus delivering the Coalition a major victory, trying to declare defeat and run proves difficult when your opponents prefer you to stay right where you are.
Failure to get some sort of package through the Senate this week means the issue will drag out through the coming parliamentary recess, allowing more time for troublemakers to complain, for Labor to tout its fictional claim of a $22 billion cut, for dodgy numbers to be paraded around, purporting to show how badly off Catholic private schools will be. The government has already shifted in response to retiring senator Chris Back’s threat to cross the floor, delaying the implementation of the package by a year for Catholic schools. That’s a signal to others that they might be accommodated, too. If it drags out, it will be at the same time that the internal dispute over energy policy is bubbling away. It could indeed be a winter of discontent in Coalition ranks.
Labor would be perfectly happy for the issue to remain unresolved at the next election, just as the Coalition was happy to ensure the problem of asylum seekers remained unresolved. For all the claims that Turnbull has, by co-opting David Gonski himself, neutralised schools funding, the entire issue remains one that Labor owns.
The Greens, who have had no difficulties agreeing to back the government in the past on small matters like changes to Senate voting or company tax transparency, appear unable to come to a position despite having the government keen to do a deal, even if it costs some serious money in expediting the rollout of the full funding model in coming years. Any decision from the Greens will be tomorrow, at the earliest. On the positive side for the government, One Nation has said they’ll back the package, despite Pauline Hanson making ridiculous — even by her standards — proposals to force schools to punish students more.
Embracing Gonski and taking the hard decision to cut spending on an over-funded private school sector was always a risk for Turnbull and his minister Simon Birmingham. If it doesn’t come off this week, it might become increasingly problematic. But there are still two and a half sitting days to go, and maybe some detention on Friday if there’s the possibility of late deal. Much rides on it.
Altogether, it makes me continue to despair about the parlous state of Oz politics. Talk about a total self-interested, tangled mess.
There is a problem and the usual political philosophy reigns supreme. Strange to read a Bernard Keane throw away describing the Catholic education sector as a linger term rent seeker. What could he mean?
In labelling the Australian Education Union ‘rentseekers’, and criticising the Greens for even deliberating about their vote, Bernard Keane appears to be unaware that there are genuine criticisms of Gonksi 2.0 that need to be thought seriously about. Well, there are. See for instance Jane Caro (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/19/not-sensible-logical-or-needs-based-a-tale-of-three-gonskis) and Trevor Cobbold (http://www.saveourschools.com.au/funding/gonski-20-is-a-fraud).
I’m not taking issue with the view that a (significantly amended) Gonski 2 should ultimately be supported. I think it should. But journos like Michelle Grattan and now, Keane, are resorting to insults, instead of engaging with the complexity of the issue.
Bernard…the $22 billion cut over ten years is NOT fictional. Labor have already said it can easily be paid for by not giving large mutli-national companies a tax cut. Why would they? Said companies don’t pay any tax now, so it would just be another taxpayer hand out to big business, which could be put to much better use in the education sector.
Funding to all private schools should be very slowly reduced over a ten to twenty year time frame…and some of that money moved into the public school system at the same time. IMHO that would provide the equity in education that is missing at the moment.
Well, I think Labor should be backing Gonski 2.0 as a start – after all, parts of it, like over funding to Catholic schools, goes further in addressing education inequality than Labor ever did – and promising to put their additional $22b into education should they win government. They could even claim credit for turning the LNP away from the right on education. But no. Labor are doing this, instead.
I’m dreading the next election because I can easily foresee I’ll have no one to vote for, yet again. Hard times to be a lefty.