That people in the US are sending pipe bombs to critics or opponents of Donald Trump and media outlets is another of those moments we’ve seen so many of in the US since 2015: astonishing and yet unsurprising, a new low and yet simply another waypoint on a downward slope that shows no signs of bottoming out. Trump denounced the terrorism, but we know that next week, tomorrow, tonight, he’ll be back to attacking the media as traitors, lauding people who assault journalists, beaming as rally crowds chant “lock her up”, smearing and vilifying opponents and critics.
Each new outrage achieves the goal of those who perpetrate it, of expanding the window not of what is legitimate or appropriate in the conduct of politics, but of what is conceivable. Each time, the boundaries are reset, further and further toward government-endorsed violence, harassment and abuse. Fascism doesn’t happen quickly. You don’t wake to find yourself in a fascist state; you move there, bit by bit, as what surprises and outrages us as a society shifts to the point where it’s no longer surprising that critics of a leader might be targeted by terrorism, that media companies and journalists should be threatened and attacked, that the modern equivalent of brownshirt gangs attack anti-Trump protesters.
From the relative safety of Australia we can look on with horror at America’s slide into fascism. It’s not a case of there but for the grace of god go us. Over the last 30 years, Australia has made deliberate choices — like Medicare, and award-based minimum wages and a progressive tax system — about its economy that have prevented the worst capitalist excesses fueling the angry populism of many Western countries. But there are forces within our media that see an opportunity in exploiting the less developed forms of malignant politics we have in our own polity, malignancies created by a specific kind of resentment, that of white men.
Thus, the Seven network now has an extended history of deliberately giving a platform to extremist voices, frequently amplifying Pauline Hanson’s racism, trying to legitimise violent fascist Blair Cottrell, proposing that that bete noir of old white men, Yassmin Abdel-Magied, be made to “face her critics”. And Sky News, which has also hosted Cottrell, is, in effect, a stream of far-right lies and vitriol all evening. Sky only reaches a tiny number of like-minded old male viewers, but its impact is magnified by the extent to which conservative MPs take it not as the white male privilege porn that it is, but an actual reflection of the real world.
Seven, Sky and Fairfax-owned 2GB — another circle of old white males rage-wanking over their perceived loss of privilege — all play the same trick on their audiences that Trump, the Brexit crowd, News Corp and other right-wing media in the US and the UK all play: they purport to side with those who have failed to benefit from neoliberalism and the political corruption it has engendered, while pushing neoliberal economic policies and the interests of corporations and the powerful. It’s an old trick much beloved of politicians of both parties in the American south, distracting your victims with racism and bigotry while you get on with exploiting them economically.
Kerry Stokes, the Murdochs, Jones and Hadley, Trump, Boris Johnson, Pauline Hanson, Marine Le Pen in France — these are all members of the elite exploiting resentment toward the elite, often while promoting or themselves doing the very things that alienate the electorate. Witness that tribune of the people Alan Jones, who smites the powerful hip and thigh on behalf of the ordinary Australian, using his influence to look after his racing industry mates.
We’re lucky to have only in miniature form the kind of frightening cancer that is rapidly consuming American politics. But in the absence of politicians willing to deliver a political and economic system that voters believe works for them, not for the powerful, we have the conditions, and the media, that will take us down the US path. If Labor ends up winning next year, it may be the political class’ last opportunity to head off that kind of fate and convince voters that they can deliver for them.
An FDR-type moment for Bill Shorten, Bernard? Saving the Australian version of capitalism?
Those deliberate choices you speak of. They were instigated and protected by a small handful of left leaning governments and immediately upon implementation the conservative parties, representing those “circle of old white males rage-wanking” set about planning to stack boards, de-fund and demonise the specific things that you’ve identified as being central to our protection.
Central to all of this is that as we take the down escalator to troubled times…look across at who is riding the up escalator to increased profits and you’ll see a skinny old half corpse called Rupert.
Will Fascism come to Australia? If any reading of European history is any guide it will. Getting your Political voice heard is still very hard today, even with lots of new platforms. With certain MSM giving those with Neo- fascist views, Australian wide coverage , and governments needing their parliament votes , add the last 30 years of Neo- liberal economics giving winners and loosers it is sure fire rescipe for Fascism.
Bernard, that’s a very good survey of the forces in the US pushing toward fascism and those here who ape them, with an influence utterly disproportionate to the number in the population who share their views, which I estimate, possibly wrongly, to be around 20%.
However, we do not share the conditions in the US that smooth the path to fascism. We are not and never have been a dominant imperial power that has lost its economic and technological superiority over all others, despite seeing off contenders like the USSR and Japan over the years since WW2. We do not hanker after the fifties, when women were in their place and Americans could assume they could dispatch governments that opposed them with wars or coups.
But you are right, Bernard, to think that dispatching the Coalition, which tries to use far right wing media ranting to their advantage, is an essential step in keeping us secure from dark influence from our great and powerful friend, which is ready to line up allies and client states like us to confront China, even though this is utterly contrary to our national interest.
This does not mean we distance ourselves from every part of a confrontation with China: we have no interest in agreeing with its attempt to turn the South China Sea into its territorial waters or to look away from any human rights abuses that might flow from increasing nationalist currents in Chinese politics.
I tend to agree except on human rights. We need to clear up our many human right abuses under the auspices of so-called ‘Homeland Security’ before we have any bragging rights. Our abominable deal with the Timor Gap also severely diminished our sea sovereignty claims and must never be repeated.
I agree with you in regards to the ”Human Rights abuses.” I do suspect though that the difference between the Chinese Human Rights abuses are in political eyes seen as more problematic as the Chinese are torturing & imprisoning their own people, for having opposing or differing views to the current Communist Party…whereas the govt in respect of Nauru & the offshore detention centres, would point out that they are ”illegal immigrant/refugees”…which though most Australians are aware that this isn’t a legitimate excuse, I would suggest the politics behind this is something they obviously think that they can live with, (how I don’t know)…. …this is why things are starting to change…having said this there are still many issues around the treatment of the 1st nation/indigenous people that have been treated abominably ever since Cook stepped on these shores..there’s still problems with this..l.so no country can sit back on it’s heels & brag about having a clean slate…as long as politics & money are bed fellows it’s not a fair game…
For us to avoid this crap we need systematic reform, here are a few suggestions:
1. Bans on political advisers standing for Parliament for a number of years after leaving that role, and a similar delay for ex-MPs becoming lobbyists.
2. Bans on large donations, and instant reporting of all smaller donations that are allowed.
3. Institute Multi-member electorates in the lower house to reduce the spending distortions caused by marginal seats, perhaps coupled with a parallel list system of electing MPs (as per NZ).
That’ll do for a start.
Agree, even coming around to MME. This would not be necessary had we an intelligent electorate who could be arsed to think about issues instead of voting the way they always have.
What’s that old saw about doing the same thing over & over and wondering why the result is shit?
My thoughts exactly AR…this is a constant in regards to voting for the same party…this is why the result is shyte & always will be until people stop with the zombie approach to voting & actually pay attention…
I’m inclined to suggest one more observance : a halt to campaigning 48 hours prior to the election day an NO supporters and hence NO election material at polling stations. Polling stations are to be contamination free.
The candidate’s office may provide information but that information is available only at the office or on a website.
Electors may seek information (office or the internet) but “in-one’s face” information comes to an end 48 hours prior to the day.
Yes, I’d support those suggestions.
How-to-vote cards are an insult to an intelligent voter which is why they are so ubiquitous.
We tend to hold our elections in the warmer months so that the lumpen, with that iniquitous Line – thanks a bunch PJK, can number beyond ten without taking off shoes.