The official line from senior federal Liberals like Josh Frydenberg and Greg Hunt was that Saturday’s 57-43% walloping in the Victorian election has nothing to do with federal issues. Today’s Newspoll result, another 55-45% disaster for the government, suggests otherwise.
The Victorian Liberals didn’t do themselves any favours — especially not Michael Kroger’s bizarre litigation against the party’s key fundraising arm — but the fact Scott Morrison wasn’t invited to the campaign doesn’t mean he escapes the blame. We keep hearing how unpopular Bill Shorten is, but for an unpopular guy he sure spends a lot of time on the ground in successful election campaigns. In NSW — Morrison’s home state — Gladys Berejiklian was yesterday flagging she wouldn’t be looking to the Prime Minister for any help in her campaign in March. Nothing to do with federal issues, eh?
Matthew Guy was never more than a 40-60 chance of knocking off a first-term government, at best. But the Victorian result was so awful that Berejiklian’s prospects of survival in NSW are looking significantly worse. It’s one thing to not pull off an unlikely victory from opposition; it’s quite another for arguably Australia’s best government to face possible defeat at the hands of an inept and corrupt NSW Labor Party.
NSW upper house Liberal MP Peter Phelps — with whose services the party has foolishly dispensed on the weekend, thanks to factional wars — nailed it when he said the best thing Morrison could do for Victorian and NSW Liberals was bolt to an early election and let voters belt him, leaving his state-level colleagues to stand or fall on their merits.
The federal Liberals were given a strong warning when they lost Wentworth for the first time ever. But that result was dismissed as atypical — as a seat that was somehow not the real Liberal Party, despite being a stronghold of fundraising and never voting any other way. Now, you sense, Victoria too will be dismissed as atypical — an unusually progressive state, with even dyed-in-the-wool eastern suburbs Liberals, many of whom shifted to Labor, somehow seen as unrepresentative of the party. Come May next year, perhaps the whole country will be dismissed as atypical, and the few remaining Liberals can retreat to the Roseville RSL in Sydney and listen to Tony Abbott speeches.
There are strong forces actually pushing for that outcome, although they see it more as a kind of ideological crusade that will burn off impure moderates and heretical small-l liberals. They are to be found on the right of the party, in the extreme right parade on Sky News at night, on 2GB in Sydney and in News Corp mastheads. They form an echo chamber every bit as hermetically-sealed as those that exist on social media among the left. And Scott Morrison is trapped in there with them.
Morrison’s Trump-style mugging is a deliberate effort to earn their endorsement: denying climate change, taking swipes at journalists, pandering to the Netanyahu regime, cracking sexist jokes, attacking Muslims — even wearing baseball caps. In a relatively short time as prime minister, he has deliberately cultivated an image as a suburban Trump, but with none of the political cunning, nor the voluntary voting, that makes the latter a success.
To avoid a national repeat of Saturday, Morrison has to break out of the echo chamber. But he has little time. The country is about to enter its summer slumber. That could provide the basis for a late January reset, but by then it’ll only be four months until the election.
Some Howard 2007-style spending of additional revenue from commodity price increases — because that did our fiscal position so much good last time — will help, but the options are narrowing. It’s also clear that both the Victorian Liberals and the LNP in Queensland are struggling to run decent campaigns. Peta Credlin — who knows about winning campaigns — nailed it in her observations about Labor’s on-the-ground superiority in Victoria. Fixing that will be an even more difficult task in the six months remaining to Morrison and his colleagues.
The defeat of the coalition nationally is now surely a certainty. Three years of polls which show a stubborn inclination from the electorate to obliterate the right wing nasties cannot be ignored. It’s going to be ugly.
NSW Labor on the other hand, offers no alternative vision to the usual NSW policy of both parties to sell off Sydney and its fringes to the biggest paying property developer and to totally ignore the rest of NSW.
The only hope that the NSW ALP have is that Morrison will turn up an “campaign” at high volume and spittle for the Liberals…it is the only way the ALP can win in NSW.
What makes the NSW Liberal Government “arguably Australia’s best Government”? This isn’t meant to be Liberal bashing, but have they been that fantastic to outshine the other states and territories? They seem to be just as scandal prone, yet apparently they are rubber.
Teflon, at least mike was.
In the Warrnambool branch, they were toasting abbott being expelled.
Crikey is becoming just too ridiculus lately. Derren Hinch had better output than this rubbish. For NSW it’s bloody easy to look good when you sell sell absolutely everything and splurge it on trophies such as replacing modern stadiums and over-featured but underscoped tramline work. I’m sure the NSW govt is more than capable of killing off themselves, just as nsw labor has recently been attempting, it’s just that they have loads of cash to save their arses. As the Federal government apparently has load of cash now, will you be cheering them as good governers on for the embarrassing wastage that will inevitably occur?
“For NSW it’s bloody easy to look good”
You obviously don’t live in NSW! The only person who praises the NSW Lib government is Bernard. I assume he’s just doing for the lulz at this point.
Agree with it or not, their infrastructure program is impressive.
Sure it’s taking forever and turning the entire Sydney metro area into a giant construction zone, but I personally rather a Government that commits to things and follows them through (even if I hate more than half the projects) rather than a Government that does nothing in office other than play a small target strategy. Bob Carr wrote the book on this.
I think that was hy usedCarr gazetted so many national parks – all the more hollow logs to stuff with cash, rather than building infrastructure.
He, and Abbottrocious, show what happens when journos. become pollies and Mr Shouty is now the exemplar for not letting ad-men anywhere near Treasury benches.
okay you must’n’t live in Melbourne, we’re living with constant transport interruptions & yes the place has become a whole mecano set of strategically placed building sites & pure chaos ensues usually at or in the middle of rush hours at each end of the day when they decide to start/finish working…but the Andrews government are taking out the most dangerous of the railway crossings, expanding the infrastructure for the trains & trams, it seems that they I think won a lot of votes just for doing that & getting much needed projects of the ground…
Having lived in Sydney for most of my adult life, the corruption on both sides of government was glaringly obvious for many years.. all the infrastructure, ensuing chaos they’re causing now should have been done years ago, this is where politicians need to be kept as far away from major planning & infrastructure decisions as is practicable/possible as they have no real comprehension of what these things are all about, also due to their often short lived tenure, their less inclined to get this long term projects up & running..
So what makes the NSW government so great, Bernard? The privatisation of the Land Titles Office, which has seen a 400% increase in the cost of their services? Maybe the dumb-@$$ decision to knock down & rebuild two perfectly functional stadiums, at massive costs to the public purse? Maybe the decision to outsource the construction of trains to South Korea, only to have the trains be too large for the tracks? Maybe the decision to allow a gambling agency to promote itself on the sails of Sydney Opera House? Maybe its their stupid lock-out laws? Maybe it’s the massive scandals that have seen close to a dozen of their number-including one ex-Premier-forced to resign? Maybe its their granting of water licenses to agribusiness under extremely dodgy circumstances? I could go on, but I am sure your readers get the gist.
Not saying NSW Labor is brilliant in any way, but they’ve got to be a better option than the Librorts Party.
Exactly Marcus there is nothing that the NSW state government really has the ability to get right… I can still remember them at 4.30 am emptying the water out of the water storage pipes on the North side near my house, so that they could justify putting up water prices, & saying that there was a water shortage when there wasn’t, it got to a stage, because we had so much rain that year they had the guys doing it most mornings, that was about 15 years ago, but the NSW govt has it’s own agenda & interests, always has, it seems that more things change, the more they stay the same..
I am one of the voters deliriously happy to live in NSW under the Liberal government.
# In NSW we get to enjoy the new legislation to create a new stolen generation.
# We get to enjoy the government spending hundreds of millions of $$$$s to knock down perfectly good, newish sports stadiums for the benefit of certain media moguls who arent even Australian.
# We get to enjoy terrible traffic in Sydney as public transport is being progressively being gutted to so that Sydney commuters will be forced to pay tolls on the new toll roads. How many governments with cities bursting at the seams change from double decker to single decker trains? Stroke of genius.
# In Sydney there is a superlative new private hospital where the money isnt being spent on those discretionary items like medicines and bandages.
# In the bush the public hospitals around me are dying for lack of funds.
Perhaps what Keane is really saying is that if the NSW Liberal government is the best of all, then that must just go to show how utterly appalling the other Liberal State governments are. I’ll drink to that.
Is Bill Shorten really inordinately unpopular? He’s a politician. All politicians, almost by definition, are unpopular. Morrison is just ‘preferred Prime Minister.’ That doesn’t mean he’s popular. If he was popular, he would have campaigned in the Victorian election. But he didn’t.
bill shorten may not be popular but he`s a lot smarter and much better campaigner than anything this disgusting coalition rabble can offer, even with the resources of the Murdoch media and the donations from big mining and the multinationals and the blatant lies of scummo and his mates he`s still a good bet to be Australia`s next PM and for quite a few decades to come as this coalition rabble self destructs and proceeds to eat itself whole.
And Shorten managed to unite Labor after the Rudd debacle, and Labor has since spent its time crafting (largely) good policies for when they win office. He has obviously got something going for him. You don’t have to be charismatic to be a good leader. You have to have the ideas and take the team with you and he seems to have done this.
These “(largely) good policies” of which you write – any citation?
Adani? Continued concentration camps? A 3rd hand tory ETS?
Do tell.