For anyone who loves Melbourne, there’s such a cornucopia of crap coming down the line, that it’s difficult to choose among. In Russell Street, there’s been a pitched battle to save the 1920s Theosophical Society building — a fine Manhattan-style metropolitan building, which is part of a pre-war block — from demolition, for a (in my subjective opinion) joyless, sterile, historyless glass and steel box hotel that would replace it.
The laneways/heritage precinct on Little Bourke near the Elizabeth Street corner is about to be wrecked, because the building that anchors it — the Chicago-style “moderne” century-old Melbourne House — is to be demolished to be replaced by, guess what, a sterile new hotel.
Up near the Victoria Market, work has already begun on the Munro’s site — a block of small buildings from various eras, with a terrace of shops in Therry Street facing the market, and an essential part of the market’s charm — which will be mostly replaced with a bland, monotonous skyscraper frontage that would have looked dated as a mall in Knox City in the 1990s. The lesson other cities have learnt — that you retain heritage at street level and integrate the new — has been forgotten. Particularly galling, since we taught a lot of other cities that, and the council owns the Munro’s site.
And in Flinders Street, Melbourne Metro is pushing to unnecessarily eviscerate most of the deco/modernist 1940s Campbell Arcade/underpass to create a tunnel from the new Town Hall station to Flinders Street. Since Campbell Arcade leads into Degraves Street, Centre Place, and then, via “The Walk” to Little Collins Street, it could be rendered as the start of the laneways network, restored and invested in. That would require joined-up thinking, not much in evidence at the moment.
But for sheer nihilistic, headbanging stupidity, you can’t go past the latest move by the privatised Fed Square management, which is to put in an application to demolish the “Yarra Building” (the Alfred Deakin building, as was) ahead of a Heritage Council ruling on the whole of Fed Square, due in a few weeks’ time.
Demolishing a single building is, of course, in pursuit of putting an Apple Store – or whatever they’re calling it this week — in the middle of Melbourne’s primary public square. The project, rammed into cabinet by the now departed (from cabinet) subfaction of Philip Dalidakis and John Eren, and waved through by a supine premier and Planning Minister Richard Wynne, turns that public square into a shopping mall — from a space where people exist as citizens, to a giant commodity, where people exist as commodities, sold to the corporation.
It’s a measure of how corroded by cynicism and neoliberalism Labor has become that this proposal got anywhere at all. Apple tried the same thing in Sweden with Stockholm’s central Kungsträdgården last year, and was told to piss off — the city and the country’s Social Democratic leaders still capable of remembering why they are that in the first place. Doubtless those pushing the Apple Store had nothing but the best interests of Melbourne and Victoria at heart — doubtless — but my God, the Apple execs who negotiated it must have gone back to their steel and glass hotel and laughed liked drains at the deal they got.
This is the capital city of about the 30th largest economy in the world (GDP of $399 billion); essential to this, apparently, is a glorified computer store at the centre of its public space. That’s the trouble with state Labor governments: they’re made up of mediocre union hacks, suburban warlords and scheming high-school teachers, who think they’re ahead of the game. When they go up against real players, they get cored and peeled like a Granny Smith. Nine months after the deal was done, Apple issued a profit warning. The dimwits in Spring Street would have, in past years and decades, sold the square to Borders, Dick Smith or Atari, if they’d had half a chance.
By a process of arse-covering — the deal has already been done; Fed Square is under private management — the full measure of this nihilism comes to pass: a building is demolished to trash a public square, so that the Heritage Council can’t rule that it belongs to the Victorian people in common. What an absolutely fantastic and characteristic result of this absurd process. They should get the jerks who illegally demolished the Corkman pub in to do it. The circle would be complete.
Well, there’s still time for an ostensibly Socialist Left government — which, in its usual style, covers its neoliberalism by small (though worthy) social measures, the latest being banning “gay conversion” therapy — to show some basic commitment to the principles that underlie the labour movement. That principle is that we are only fully human, only citizens, if we are not wholly consumed by the market. And we require genuine public spaces to do that. One building, in one square, is really a betrayal of the whole city. Having won an electoral triumph, Daniel Andrews and Richard Wynne are about to build a monument (in the shape of an iPad! Would you guys be interested in an exciting Mangrove Flats timeshare I’m starting up?) to their own political cowardice. It will be there, to be pointed to, for decades to come.
Excellent rant today Guy. That whole sorry Apple episode, makes me want to spit blood and bile in frustrated fury.
Me too, Paddy. I loathe the so-called ‘square’, but still, I’d like to spit blood and bile AT somebody, preferably Daniel F. Andrews.
Big tick Paddy to your ” . . . spit blood and bile at . . .” Perversely, our emotional outrage, reaction to dismantling piece by piece Australian heritage, culture, language locks us into a reactive mindset. What’s needed is a more proactive, visionary assault upon the political, mercenary, anti-cultural vandalism practiced by current leaders. My humble view is that responsibility rests with Australian youth. They are the hope, their energy is the one source capable of challenging. We older generations can remind, support; but most of all we need to be proactive in taking every opportunity to engage, involve younger generations in understanding the Australian identity, culture and language is unique and worth defending.
If youth are our hope, we is rooooned.
We are certainly ‘rooooned’ without them. Talk with them AR and share not only your life experience; but the end game at stake should they continue . . . .
I’ve tried, both my nearest & dearest, those of friends and randoms I meet out & about.
Prognosis not good, I feel the Steely Dan lyrics apply –
The things you think are precious/ … The things that pass for knowledge/ I can’t understand.
Although we mostly use the same words the meanings have changed.
This isn’t new, I think Socrates had a bit of a whinge about yoof but that doesn’t mean that he was wrong.
I’m glad that you are optimistic and sincerely hope that you are correct in so being.
We can but try A R . . . in fact no alternative to but try? Yes, before Universities and higher educational entities abandoned education and adopted commercialisation as their sole imperative; we could have counted upon generational energy to challenge corporate/political leadership. Evenso, am of the opinion that the latent ‘drive’ still exists. No leader welcomes competition . . . even from callow, untested youth. Sad days indeed.
We need to start thinking about how to respond to the store tragic circumstances of its construction. The standing man protest as in Tarik Square might be useful. Or ostentatiously using a non-Apple product inside. iOccupy!
‘The dimwits in Spring Street would have, in past years and decades, sold the square to Borders, Dick Smith or Atari, if they’d had half a chance.’
Add Crazy Clark’s to that list. Indeed, the Apple execs must love doing business in Melbourne, their favourite capital city for shooting fish in a barrel.
I preferred Apple when they had one-tenth of the market, these days they aspire to be the East India Company. By the way, what ever happened to them, they were kicking goals…
The Indian Mutiny? In its early days the factors spoke the local languages, lived within, and often married into, the community but that had more or less ceased by the mid 1800s.
After that was crushed it lost its concession and the British government established the Raj.
excellent
cf: https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/12/republican-tax-plan-apple-town-squares
No!! Not the Melbourne Building!!!! Sorry I don’t give a hoot for Fed Square but Thierry St (Munro site) and now your advice that the wonderfully eccentric Melbourne Building is going breaks my heart. Our city has become a hollow shell surrounded by ugly skyscrapers. Not an ounce of imgination in any of them.
Yes sad news about the old buildings and the market precinct.
We could probably do without the square altogether. I quite liked it for a bit but time is not being kind and it’s pretty dumb that it doesn’t look over the river. It’s fast going out of date. Leave the Ian Potter there and turn the rest into open trees space with some classic statues and no interpretation centre.