Legally, Oxford’s contract doesn’t do anything Australian
universities couldn’t do already by university statute. Students have always
been bound by university rules, though compliance may improve if they expressly
agree to them.
The attractiveness of
contracts is that they are potentially less one-sided than university rules. They
can legally oblige universities to provide minimum service levels (though Oxford’s does not), as well as reinforcing students’
study commitment. Until relatively recently, universities had no reason to sign
such contracts. They answered to the Canberra bureaucracy, not students. But now fee-paying
students have bargaining power with our cash-strapped universities, contracts
could be on their way.

Crikey is committed to hosting lively discussions. Help us keep the conversation useful, interesting and welcoming. We aim to publish comments quickly in the interest of promoting robust conversation, but we’re a small team and we deploy filters to protect against legal risk. Occasionally your comment may be held up while we review, but we’re working as fast as we can to keep the conversation rolling.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please subscribe to leave a comment.
The Crikey comment section is members-only content. Please login to leave a comment.