The Senate has passed a motion to strip men’s rights activist Bettina Arndt of her Medal of the Order of Australia after the commentator suggested the murderer of Brisbane woman Hannah Clarke could have been “driven too far” when setting Clarke and her three children on fire.
Arndt has also argued that gender doesn’t play a role in domestic violence, that domestic violence isn’t prevalent in Australia and that men are more likely to injure women in two-way violence simply due to their size and strength.
Here are some findings and misconceptions about her statements.
Violence is not equal
Arndt quotes the Partner Abuse State of Knowledge (PASK) project, a literature review into domestic violence research conducted by 42 professors across the US, Canada and UK.
This is a large-scale review which looks into 17 aspects of domestic violence, reviewing 1700 pieces of academic literature.
Representatives from domestic violence advocacy groups Our Watch, Women’s Safety NSW, ANROWs and several academics contacted by Crikey weren’t familiar with the study. It has not received any substantial media attention in Australia, but its sections have been cited on Google Scholar almost 2500 times.
The section of PASK that Arndt quotes, Rates of Male and Female Perpetration, along with other international research, has found both genders are just as likely to slap, push, shove, or throw an object at a partner.
But Dr Michael Flood, a sociologist who specialises in gender and sexuality studies, said there were problems with relying on PASK.
“Firstly, it’s not a study, it’s a literature review,” he said. Many of the papers it reviewed used flawed methodology.
Most of the literature reviewed in the PASK chapter that Arndt cites uses the Conflict Tactic Scale (CTS), a common method used when collecting data on domestic violence. Participants self-report if they’ve ever engaged in different types of violence against a partner.
“The CTS doesn’t look at the impact, method, history or meaning of the violence … It doesn’t ask if the person was afraid, injured, acting in defence or if the violence had happened before, or happened often. The CTS is widely criticised,” Flood said.
The CTS also only surveys one person in the relationship, and only surveys those in a relationship.
“We know the time during and after a separation is considerably risky … it doesn’t gather data on that,” Flood said.
Dr Kristin Diemer, a sociologist at Melbourne University who conducts family and domestic violence applied research, agreed, telling Crikey PASK’s statistics don’t take into account asymmetry of violence — the severity and frequency of violence.
“Women can respond in self-defence and sometimes that will be looked at as instigating violence,” she said. “[The PASK project] asks how many times people say yes to types of physical abuse … when you count up the results, men and women answer equally.”
But, Diemer added, it doesn’t include the context or information about violence over time.
“If we can add all those elements into the actual experience of violence we see real gender contrasts, by both victimisation and perpetration,” she said.
Murder is not ‘inevitable’
In Australia, one woman is killed every nine days and a man every 29 days by their partner. Accurate statistics on intimate partner violence in the LGBTIQ community are hard to come by, but in 2015 the Australian Institute of Family Services reported people in the LGBTIQ community experience domestic violence at a similar rate to those in heterosexual couples.
Arndt writes, “it is important to acknowledge that male violence is more likely to result in injury or death than female violence towards a partner. This is inevitable due to the average man’s greater size and strength.”
But this misses a vital point: domestic violence resulting in death is not inevitable.
As Women’s Safety NSW CEO Hayley Foster puts it, “murder is always a choice”.
Arndt writes that “almost a quarter (23.1%) of victims of intimate partner homicide are male — and we hardly ever hear about these deaths”.
It’s an awful statistic but it’s still important to note gender does play a role — men are overwhelmingly the murderers.
According to the Australian Institute of Criminology, females comprised around one-fifth of intimate partner homicide offenders, and just 14% of total homicide offenders between 2015-16.
Foster says when it comes to women who perpetrate intimate partner homicide, “these cases are almost always a result of long-term, coercive control. For women, violence is characterised by retaliation.”
Flood said data supported this claim:
“If you just look at the numbers, yes, men are one-third of these deaths. But if you actually look at the data like death reviews, we find every single one of those men was a perpetrator … the woman’s violence was in the context of the history of his violence against her.”
The question of prevalence
Using ABS statistics, Arndt points to the downward trend of domestic violence over the past 20 years — though she does acknowledge a 5.7% increase in domestic violence reports in NSW over the past 10 years.
“One in 100 women experiencing this physical violence from their partners is obviously a matter of great concern. But this percentage is very different from the usual figures being trotted out. You’ll never find the figure of 1.06% mentioned by any of the domestic violence organisations in this country,” she writes.
But the reason those organisations don’t mention the 1.06% figure is that it isn’t accurate according to Foster.
“Just 20 to 30% of women are reporting violence,” Foster told Crikey.
Over the past year in NSW, her organisation supported 212,000 women experiencing violence. “Extrapolate that out: domestic violence is extremely prevalent in Australia,” she said.
Here’s the rub: violence and homicide are abhorrent in any form, especially when committed by an intimate partner. Men are victims and face challenges and stigma when reaching out for help.
But it is possible to advocate for proper services for both genders, without downplaying the role gender plays.
Arndt did not respond to Crikey’s request for comment.
If you or someone you know is impacted by sexual assault or violence, call 1800RESPECT on 1800 737 732 or visit 1800RESPECT.org.au.
For anyone seeking help, Lifeline is on 13 11 14 and Beyond Blue is 1300 22 4636.
NOTE: This article has been updated to clarify which parts of the PASK study are being referred to.
Conflict in relationships is not a black and white issue, we all know it-but in the discussion on gender/male perpetrators and imbalance of power Arndt’s points only go missing too often. You can argue about her talents as a contrarian debater, but the key point is that the research side has not provided us with very good guidance on the dynamics within relationships, which in turn only too often lead to domestic physical violence. Given the size of this societal problem and the resources, we are using to deal with the results and not the causes we need a better understanding of the underlying issues and dynamics, not calls to strip Bettina of her Australian honours.
Agreed!
In a previous relationship I was the victim of sustained intimidation, metal torture including threats of murder including that of my child, bashing’s, public humiliations and put downs, sexual violence and a general eating out of my self belief and feelings of self worth. It was like living on the side of a volcano and walking on egg shells was one of my many skills.
After 18 years of mistreatment including various affairs that were public knowledge, I got fat and started to dress badly; thus no longer the “perfect wife and mother” and was promptly replaced, with someone younger and willing to have more children.
He moved her into our house that was fully paid for by my inheritance, leaving me without a home or car.
He got our accountant to countersign to remove me from our bank accounts, access to our business accounts and a credit card.
Thank heavens that I was a qualified allied health professional and could get well paying work in a hurry because our son’s school fees direct debit had been cancelled as well. He acted as if I had never existed and neither had his son.
It took me 6 months before I even thought about doing something about my assets that I had worked so hard to accumulate and a move of state before I could get near the top of the Family Law Court list for emergency hearing and orders to prevent my soon to be ex-husband from moving business debts onto our house.
The short version was that he was forced to move out of our house and sign the title transfer within 10 days of notice, and I took possession of our racing yacht, which the Family Law Court Judge emphasizing that this was only an interim settlement. This was 30 years ago and life has been kind to me.
My escape from this psychopath took a lot of planning and I knew there was only one safe way out. It had to be his decision and I needed to fade away for long enough for him to get on with his life and get his girlfriend pregnant. Then the path of his new life was cast.
It is amazing how easy it was to shed the weight and resume my life whilst protecting my son.
Life is now a wonderful thing with a supportive husband, who enjoys a lot of similar things, who is a delight and after 20 years, I still wake in the morning and am glad to see him and I am happy to be alive.
He also lived a life of terror for nearly 30 years, hiding the knives at night, being physically attacked before he ended his marriage after he developed cancer.
I watched on the ABC last night, someone from a men’s support group saying that they had been contacted by Rowan Baxter in the nights leading up to him murdering his estranged wife and 3 children. He sounded as though he was unraveling, sobbing and almost wordlessly talking mostly unintelligible sounds. They had no one they could get to see him and had nowhere they could get him to come in to for a chat.
This is the point that I want to make, and in some ways I too see where Bettina Arndt is coming from.
80% of all reported domestic violence is perpetrated by men according to the statistics correlated nationally. That leave 20% of the perpetrators are women. Women are more likely to kill their children.
We can all be justifiably outraged that these murders and a suicide happened on our watch.
Talk is cheap and the “Never an excuse handbag hit brigade” generates the righteous outrage and yes, I too feel that way. I am also so very frustrated with the knee jerk reaction of the handbag hit squad when a male police officer appealed for any information especially from any friends of Rowan.
This police officer had just helped cover the bodies and had seen close up a crime that will live in his memory forever. Did it occur to people that just because he used the words “a man pushed too far”, he was not victim blaming he was hoping to draw any men who knew anything out?
If you view this tragic situation as this man, father, husband and police Inspector did, the police felt they had failed and they wanted to know if there had been any warning signs that they missed this time that they will endeavour to never do next time.
Instead of getting men who may have felt uncomfortable but willingly telling all that they knew about Rowan and his mental state coming forward; the handbag hit squad with their righteous anger with any man who is not dismissing the perpetrator as a “monster” cancelling the police inspector by protesting so loud and so long that he is no longer looking into any of it.
This dismissal of the perpetrator as a “monster” means that the “talk is cheap” and so is legislation if it is backed up with nothing of substance.
What if, the police had been able to discern commonalities with other similar crimes and help develop a check list that identifies the person who is breaking into the unhinged and allows them to stop the rest of the next tragedy from unfolding?
Arndt is effectively a paid liar, like so many of her right wing colleagues and fellow travelers – she happily takes money for spreading lies and half truths in a publicity-seeking manner.
It was not a commentator, but a senior police officer, who said that the police investigation should be professional and impartial, including the possibility that the perpetrator “had been pushed too far”. Police are quite familiar with domestic violence investigations and are quite familiar with the finding that the violence was a climax to a longer story, when one partner had been pushed too far.
The integrity of the officer, and the integrity of Bettina Arndt, should not be doubted. Neither should we doubt their courage for confronting an audience in a lynch mob mood. Give them both a medal.
Not sure where you’re going here, Roger, but that must have been one hell of a ‘push too far’ for some bloke to get a tank of petrol and burn not just his wife, but his three kids to death. That is an agonizing way to go, and it’s not quick. Some shit is simply not justifiable. This is not a ‘let’s step back and think about it’ moment. Senior Detective Mark Thompson and Arndt have rightly been hauled over the coals for their comments.
Roger, are you likely to burn kids to death if you’re pushed too far?
The issue of being “pushed too far” doesn’t really cut it when we talk about murder. Which is the point of the outrage. Irrespective of the kind of relationship they actually had, there’s no reasonable path from whatever relationship difficulties they had to murdering his wife and children.
The facts, no matter what they are, are going to excuse the monstrosity of the actions taken. Trying to frame them in a wider context still ends up with brutal mass murder.
yikes
The woman is deluded to say the least!
What a low piece of human waste this women is. First a paedophile defender now this.
Bolt and these other right wing warriors constantly defend the indefensible if they think it bolsters their twisted angry view of the world
No matter what the circumstances, a man who sets his whole family on fire, well what more is there to say.
I’m amazed how badly, how quickly her award blew up in the collective face of the government. The signs were there that she would say or do something very embarrassing eventually, but to defend this mere weeks after becoming (very controversially) an OAM is nuts. Couldn’t have even imagined a passionate defense of a guy burning his whole immediate family to death, while they were alive, then killing himself.
This is your brain on culture wars. Imagine the galaxy brains one would need to give that award out? I can’t even comprehend it.