The federal government’s sudden reversal of its support for Clive Palmer’s High Court challenge to West Australia’s border closures was ostensibly related to safety fears and the health of the nation. But Scott Morrison’s political health was at risk as well.
As the angry backlash escaped the borders of WA to the rest of the country, the prime minister belatedly realised that Palmer is almost as toxic as the virus itself.
He took his time. All last week Attorney-General Christian Porter was in the media defending the court case, and on Wednesday the PM ramped up the rhetoric warning that Palmer was “likely to win”.
But despite the repeated attacks on WA Premier Mark McGowan’s hard border closure right up until a Friday afternoon media doorstop with Porter, that line became harder to defend as the worsening virus forced Victoria into tougher lockdown.
They say a day is a long time in politics. It’s even longer in a pandemic.
In a letter dated August 1 from the PM to McGowan and released Sunday morning, Morrison wrote that he had “taken into account the changed state of the pandemic”, and noted the “high level of concern regarding public health in the Western Australian community”.
“I consider, on balance, that we must set aside the normal convention in these circumstances and not continue the Commonwealth’s participation in this case,” Mr Morrison wrote.
The news was immediately welcomed by McGowan, although he did point out he hoped it didn’t come too late given how far the case had already proceeded after the Federal Court heard arguments last week ahead of a High Court hearing.
Palmer “thanked” Morrison for his support and indicated the Commonwealth intervention had been a great help — just the kind of association they had been desperately trying to play down.
The government’s whole dubious defence of the intervention in the Palmer case had been that they were simply doing what they had to do in any constitutional challenge and not actually supporting a man who had been charged with fraud only weeks before.
While the decision to finally listen to reason should be welcomed, let’s hope the only damage is once again to the PM’s political judgment and not to the nation’s ultimate health.
Morrisons’s attack on WA’s border policy is grubby even by his standards. He’s let Palmer take the lead then sneaked in behind to use the full weight of the federal government to present evidence backing Palmer’s case. After the damage was done Morrison promptly disappeared hoping to leave Palmer to take all the blame while he pretends “A big boy did it and ran away”.
If the border has to be reopened WA is desperately vulnerable. Once the sickness and deaths start mounting up here I would like to see Palmer and Morrison both come to walk about in Perth so that West Australians can have a word with them about what they’ve done for us. Because they really will have done for us.
I’m sure come the eventual federal election, Sandgropers won’t forget Scum’s actions, regardless of whether there’s a resurgence of the virus in WA or not. https://www.perthnow.com.au/politics/clive-palmer/morley-fast-food-joint-rack-city-ribs-unveils-the-fat-cant-burger-with-chive-palmergiana-in-honour-of-clive-palmer-ng-b881627107z
What happens if the High Court rules in Palmer’s favour and McGowan says “so what” and keeps his border closed?
Will Defence Minister Reynolds (also from WA) send in the army? Will Dutton send in the AFP?
Or, oh the irony. Border Force?
Feds sniff the western winds and back away from Palmer’s WA border case
The Commonwealth government was actively supporting Palmer’s case. They are shown to be a supporter in the Court pleadings.
I believe it is ‘normal convention’ for a government wishing to keep an impartial eye on a case to join as an ‘amicus curiae’ (friend of the Court), NOT as a supporter of a party to the action!
Carpetbagger . . politician seeking office in a place where he or she has no connections.
“I consider, on balance, that we must set aside the normal convention in these circumstances and not continue the Commonwealth’s participation in this case,” Mr Morrison wrote. “
That’s the biggest load of tosh I have ever heard. I’m pretty sure that Jilly is dead right, the amicus curiae would be closer to any ‘convention’, but I think that it was quite open to the Feds to back WAs case as well, which they should have done given the circumstances, otherwise no amount of pandemonium would have allowed States to ever lockdown, which would be crazy.
It’s a snivelling marketers excuse of a letter.
I don’t think that WA voters will forget this quickly, and Qld voters might just have a long memory too. Presumably if Palmer wins, the Qld, SA, and NSW border closures to Vic have to come down too.
Way to go ScoMo.
And tasmania’s
I agree that it was quite open to the Feds to back WA’s closure. However as if they would spurn their good friend Clive, without whom they’d be in opposition!!!
They could at least however have remained neutral and objective throughout.
I also agree with Dog’s Breakfast that it would be interesting to have Michael Bradley write an article discussing the legals and whether it is indeed the convention for the Feds to assist a large party donor/lobbyist or anyone else in a constitutional issue against a State Government! We surely need a Federal ICAC and a media to call out this type of behaviour ie the PM saying a tactic is ‘normal convention’ if it’s not.
Pollies of all persuasions know that mosquitoes have a longer memory than most voters .
Morrison is just an unprincipled opportunist. As soon as he realised there were no votes in it he backed off.
But he only backed off after the federal government’s evidence had been submitted. So he’s done all he could to help Palmer’s case, but now he’s trying to hide what he did. A coward and a grub.
Even the rabidly neoliberalists in the Western Australian opposition have had to conceed that the current government in WA has conducted itself with both determination for the welfare of its population and with considerable diplomacy in its discourse.
Not for them the shouty “us versus them” of the Victorian Opposition, the Federal executive and the IPA propaganda machine which is the Murdoch controlled commercial mainstream media.
And despite their initial opposition to the measures being taken by the MacGowan team, the WA opposition has recognised the success of the measures undertaken in WA to minimise the transmission of this highly contagious virus and to prepare, as rapidly as possible, measures for containment and treatment should it get away.
The Honourable(?) Christian(?) Porter MP on the other hand has shown what a treacherous political animal he really is – not caring for the welfare of the general population but pandering to the financial interests of his own class of rentiers and plutocrats.
Exactly SSR, they’ve submitted their case to support Palmer, a fact that only those following this closely will know.
Now all the news is largely promoting their withdrawal, not publicising that they have completed their legal submission against WA’s and Health authorities interests. A minor detail that mainstream media find un-newsworthy compared to their withdrawal.
They have had their cake and ate it too.
Porter is consistently proving he is a grubby politician.
Deliberate delays and every legal angle possible to defeat Collaery and Witness K and deny the public knowledge of a massive LNP scandal, his sign off authority to raid journalists, continual delay with Federal ICAC legislation, and now this!
I don’t know there were ever any votes in it JMNO. From what I have read the citizens weren’t hoping for open borders, and the only people calling for it were businesses affected. Border towns showed some opposition, but mainly with good concerns about how to live in Albury and work in Wodonga, or the other many border towns. These things could be worked out with better cooperation and design, but not sure of legality.
SSR pretty much nails it, though.
I read one report that he found that most people in WA strongly backed the border closure so he backed off. But that may not be correct. He is such a shape-shifter it seems in character for him to act in that way.
Some Michael Bradley discussion of legalities would be a useful follow up Crikey, if you haven’t already done it.
I am trying to get this message to politicians, can you help? It is something that seems to have been missed. Or is at least missing in public statements..
Redesign Work Practices to be Covid-19 Safe
Right now, we need a new approach which will ensure that as many businesses as possible remain open. The Premier, as matter of extreme urgency, needs to set up a working party that will redesign work practices in various industries to make them operationally Covid-19 safe!. Priority clearly needs to be give to food production, and, in particular, to meat processing.
The working party should not be a “committee of stakeholders” offering advice, it needs to consist of those with expert knowledge of work practices in general, and, the industries concerned. It needs to be capable of producing actionable outcomes. It MUST include unions, who are often close to the work places.
I cannot understand why this has not already been dome, it is obvious. I have tied to communicate this to the authourities, however, it is hard to get through.
If done properly, it should be possible to reduce the extent of the shut downs, and, their economic impact without compromising public health. This applied particularly to aged care facilities.
Karl Reed, 19 Meruka Drive Eltham 3095 04 2368 0795
You can write to any Member of the House of Representatives following this pattern:
Karl.Reed.MP@aph.gov.au
You can write to any Senator following this pattern:
Senator.Karl.Reed@aph.gov.au
You can write to any Member of the House of Representatives using this pattern (not I did not use the @ character as then my comment goes into moderation never to be seen again as the algorithm rejects email links)
Karl.Reed.MP at aph.gov.au
You can write to Senators using this pattern
Senator.Karl.Reed at aph.gov.au
Have you tried contacting the ACTU ie Sally McManus whom we’re told is working/trying to work with the Feds re the Covid crisis? You can imagine the ACTU would be interested to keeping work places safe and working during this crisis and after?