People everywhere are looking for jobs. Everyone knows someone who has had their job disappear or their hours slashed as COVID-19 rewrites our lives and livelihoods.
As the jobless rate climbs, the number of school leavers applying for university next year also rises. That’s a challenge for policymakers, universities and families.
But perhaps, also, it offers an opportunity to change the employment paradigm; to align it more closely to those careers we value, and to bring back old-fashioned jobs with a new narrative.
A daily early milk delivery in reusable glass bottles. A manned service station, where someone will check your oil, water and tyres. Real people to collect our tolls. Coffee vans, or even Prosecco vans, trawling the neighbourhood, stealing Mr Whippy’s thunder.
They’re the suggestions raised when someone asked that question to her followers on Facebook this week. “As people now find themselves out of work, what jobs would you happily pay to see come back?’’
The response was immediate, and strong. Other suggestions included ushers with a torch to stop you falling; real people, not robots, at the end of the phone; the ability to buy mixed bags of lollies at milk bars “where you agonise over how you will spend your 50 cents for half an hour’’.
Yes we can dismiss it as nostalgia. Or we can think of how our communities have changed, and how we need to refashion our lives; how the need for connection with others is an almighty big gate to our health and wellbeing.
As restrictions ease in Victoria, the need to connect with others is a lesson for everyone. The lure of a hug. The need to see a grandparent. To value what we might have forgotten.
That word “value” has been lost in the employment debate. But it’s where any new employment narrative should begin. What is the value of a nurse? Because it’s a damn lot more than we pay them now. The same with teachers, whose commitment to our children often mute their calls for better remuneration.
This pandemic has been a lesson in the importance of childcare workers and farmers and police officers, too, whose workload has included a 10% increase in domestic violence call-outs. At no extra pay.
Barbers and brewers and cheese-makers and tailors, butchers and cartographers might also fall into the same category.
How about proper remuneration for those who care for the elderly or disabled? Or recognition through permanent employment and salary for people who perform the valuable task of helping users navigate the maze of insurance claims/My Aged Care/telephone and internet plans and everything else that locks us in voicemail jail?
But instead of dancing around the minutiae, why don’t we disrupt our age-old employment model to consider the jobs landscape we need.
University is terrific for those whose hearts are set on jobs that need it. But TAFE needs to be better funded for those whose pursuits are better served there. Apprenticeships used to carry more value. So did service.
Before we heard of COVID-19, we were hearing a lot about the disruption to work from technology. By some estimates up to 40% of jobs will go by 2030 and there’s been no serious coordinated plan for what to do about it. What a shame and a scandal it will be if we don’t use the reset forced by the pandemic to have a good look at that; how we reimagine the economy to spare a generation being condemned to gig economy jobs and the widening of the gap between rich and poor.
Around the COVID cabinet table, our politicians are squabbling over state-of-origin politics and federation. They are cardinal issues. But so too are the types of jobs that could rebuild our economy and our communities; the types of skills we’ll need in 20 years as well as two years; the value we put on personal service. More than ever, it should be obvious to us that the future can’t be robots replacing humans.
It might be easy to dismiss a milkman delivering to your front door, or a postie that also carries your lunch order. But unless we look at the “value” of those, and compensate them accordingly, we’ll rise from this pandemic with more of the same. Or even worse, less of the same.

Let me be the first to say: “And bring back the tram conductors!”
Damn! You beat me to it!!! One day…. 🙂
Please, please, please get a human being to answer the phone. I recently called a financial institution and it took ten different menus to get to a human! Why did I need a human? Because their online options actually contradicted one another, terminating further progress, but that’s another story!
Onya Pedantic. The single most frustrating, pissed-off x/? &**%x 5#&2 irritant EVER!!
Worst of both worlds. There should be a law where if someone makes an UI you have to be forced to interact with the entirety of it untill they have a version where no audible tsks, grrs and arghs are heard from them. A panel of grandmothers then review it. Releasing a support form that doesn’t pass this should be punishable by pillory, members of the public may ask you your date of birth, to select all pictures with cars, give a password with mixed capitals and lower case and at least one number etc.
How happy, instrumental and complicit in the deterioration of pay and conditions in many of those jobs listed, has the party in government that King has rooted for (in mitigating and defending their actions – or ignoring rather than challenge) for years, been?
“Privatised Aged Care for profit/stagnant wages/penalty rate slashes” anyone?
Good lord at this entire article. Only bourgeoisie socialists can come up with ideas that are both unworkable and inadequate like this. Proper funding of TAFE and aged care aside (sensible but not radical in the slightest) you want some private sector jobs that don’t exist anymore back? Then pay extra fees for a premium service most of us will avoid. Labour is not cheap. If a job doesn’t make a profit the private sector won’t hire people to do it. Bespoke, artisanal service jobs there to make the upper-middle class feel better, for uhh the betterment of the working class or whatever.
Give me one of those magic money theory UBIers any day. Milkmen! God help us.
where did some proper journalism rank..?