Prime Minster Scott Morrison and Energy Minister Angus Taylor have today issued an ultimatum to the electricity sector: “the government will step up and back a new gas power plant in the Hunter Valley if the sector doesn’t replace [the Liddell power station’s] capacity.”
This continued push for a “gas-fired” recovery comes at the behest of the National COVID-19 Coordination Commission which, coincidentally, is dominated by figures from the gas industry.
So once again, the party of the free market decides the market could use a little prod in the direction they’d prefer.
Here is a list of some other recent examples of just that:
- Soon after Morrison became PM, the government decided it wanted the power to, among other things, force energy companies to divest from their assets, eliciting a rare unity ticket between Labor and the Business Council of Australia, who decried it as, well, socialism.
- Who could forget Direct Action, where the government literally replaced a market mechanism for pricing carbon with a program based on bureaucrats picking winners, so that companies and farmers could (usually) do what they would already have done anyway to reduce emissions.
- The banking super-profits tax is a question of perspective. When something similar was applied by Labor to the mining industry, it was an economy wrecking disaster that would close mines across the country and send investment fleeing to Zambia. But when the Liberals were trying to divert a growing push for a banking royal commission, a super-profits tax on the banks was fair game.
- Once the royal commission finally did happen, the government — presumably needing to prove they hated banks as much as the average citizen — introduced its Banking Executive Accountability Regime legislation. It gave the regulator such extraordinary powers of intervention — including the approval over hiring practices and the power to withhold bonuses — that even Liberal backbenchers attacked it.
- Before the 2016 election a policy of domestic gas reservation was, according to Josh Frydenberg, an “investment killer” that would “destroy investment, jobs, and ultimately lead to less gas supply”. By 2019 — via Malcolm Turnbull’s gas export restrictions — he had changed his tune.
- And while it didn’t become official policy, a favourite of ours comes from that paragon of consistency, Tony Abbott. During his backbench gargoyle phase, Abbott suggested that the federal government send the army into states that refuse to expand their natural gas production.
“Free Markets” is code used by business leaders as a figleaf when what they mean is that they do not want to pay tax and that they do not want to be regulated. No one, outside Economics acedemia at least, actually believes in “Free Markets”.
I can bet that what happens from this ‘plan’ is that that companies won’t fund gas drilling expansion They will regard it as too expensive or whatever, so Scomo’s friends/donors will say “you back us and we’ll do it”. The bottom line will be that they get the profits and writeoffs and we, the taxpayers, will underwrite it, guarantee it, fund it, but in any event, end up paying for it while the profits go out the door, overseas. The companies have got his ear and the ears of the useless Angus Taylor, and we will end up footing the bill. So like the rest of Scomos’s policies, full of grand announcement and lousy follow through..We are producing enough gas for our needs. Trouble is that it has been flogged off overseas.
The Recovery Task force is aiming for a recovery of the gas industry after they have trashed billions and killed their markets. Recovery of the rest of the economy? Who cares, as long as executives get their bonuses.
What good is sitting on the Treasury benches, if you can’t run a $tax siphon out and around the back – to your donor mate’s bottom lines?
Displays some naivety of what imported US radical right libertarian or neo-liberal economic ideology entails?
It is a form of corporatism between larger, often global, corporate entities and/or sectors with the government required to support with special policy and legislation.
At the electoral retail level (promotion) it is claimed that the government is acting on behalf of voters and society but in fact this masks the wholesale level of taking on policy catering to the corporate sector.
For all intents and purposes this is socialism for the top 1-10% and libertarian economic ideology imposed upon everybody else, or simply eugenics of the pecking order.