There are two basic explanations for why Scott Morrison and his government have so badly mishandled the issues of toxic workplaces and sexual assault since they erupted into public life in February — from the initial “as a father of daughters” silliness to yesterday’s staggering observation that “such marches, even now, are being met with bullets” in other countries.
One is that Morrison, his office and his leadership team are so profoundly out of touch with the 21st century that the rage and calls for action from women — and many men — are completely confusing to them.
The other is that they see these issues entirely through a partisan prism: these are not things that are part of the government’s strategy (economy, vaccines, etc), and these are not Liberal voters anyway, and certainly no quiet Australians, self-evidently, so they represent no threat and do not need engaging with.
Let them post their petition (the suggestion of the office of the notional minister for women, Marise Payne) and let them be grateful they live in a country that doesn’t open fire on women protesters. The sections of the media that are paying attention to them will get sick of the issue and the government can get back to business as usual.
Either way, it represents a remarkable missed opportunity for Morrison to actually grow into a national leader, or at least give the impression of one, instead of the smirking salesman he is. Or rather a series of missed opportunities. Time and again, Morrison has taken the lazy option of responding in purely political terms: the stolid attempt to downplay the government’s failings in relation to Brittany Higgins; the ever-expanding series of inquiries initiated as she failed to go away; the failure to respond appropriately to Linda Reynolds’ “lying cow” comments; the refusal to read the documents relating to Christian Porter.
At each moment, Morrison could have taken a different approach: a more forceful denunciation of his ministry and staff’s failure to tell him about Higgins (if that’s what it was, for we can’t take Morrison’s word for anything); a proper inquiry into why he wasn’t told, with heads on the line; a real rebuke of Reynolds over her defamation of Higgins; a proactive management of the Porter issue — including actually bothering to read the documents — and a confidential judicial inquiry that would, almost certainly, find no case for the attorney-general to answer, but enable Morrison to declare he has zero tolerance for any such alleged conduct.
As for yesterday’s march, Morrison was doubtless terrified of being booed even if he showed up merely to listen. And no PM wants to look like a badly rattled Kevin Rudd marching out of Parliament House notepad in hand to listen to pink batt protesters. But smart politicians sense opportunity in adversity.
There’s a story about Lyndon Johnson during the 1960 presidential campaign being besieged in a hotel in Dallas — by that stage regarded as the “City of Hate”, rightly as it turned out — by a mob of furious far-right protesters. Instead of shrinking from them, LBJ theatrically declared that there should never be a day when he couldn’t walk his lady across a Dallas street, took Lady Bird by the hand and ventured out into them. The resulting television images of Johnson and his wife being abused and spat at outraged even conservative southerners and helped deliver Texas for the Democrats.
John Howard did something similar when he agreed to address furious rallies of gunowners, conscious of the potential threat to himself.
If Morrison had had the guts to go out and endure jeers and boos — no one ever died from being booed, Scott — and be seen to listen, it might have done far more for his image with voters than any number of stunts and announcements. Instead, his response about shooting protesters will go down as one of the more tone-deaf remarks by any prime minister.
It wouldn’t have taken much. But sometimes a politician is too busy spinning to see what’s happening right in front of him.
Is ScoMo tone deaf? Or is he dizzy from spinning? Let us know your thoughts by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication in Crikey’s Your Say section.
His comment about shooting protestors was a threat. A thinly veiled one. This government already tries people in secret, locks up people who have committed no crimes, even if they are children. It would be foolish to ignore this comment or try & pretend it was something other than the threat it was intended to be.
While the PM noted that he refrained from shooting at the marchers, perhaps he ought to have noted that the marchers equally refrained from stalking the halls of parliament looking for representatives to lynch, something else that happened not a million miles away…
That is how I read it too. Passive aggressive and chilling AF.
I got that impression as well, Penny. The kind of double handed comment that goes along the lines of “Other countries do this…” with the unsaid “We could too, if we wanted to.”
Or am I reading too much into it? This is Scotty, after all, and subtext is not his specialty.
Jen: Dishes are done, cuppa for my swinging dick?
Smirko: Nah darl but hey, Jen, your people are upset about rape stuff still and ballsack reckons they’re gonna march tomorrow, what should I do?
Jen: Well, um, probably best not to shoot them.
Smirko: Really? You sure?
Jen: Just a thought.
Smirko: What do you mean ‘a thought’?
Jen: Here we go, I’m going to bed.
Smirko: Jen, have you been thinking again? I thought we agreed that…
Neither hose nor gun, he holds.
Brave, brave Scott Morrison.
Agreed Penny. This Scott is unashamedly inspired by the likes of Trump and Brian, and fake narratives are their biz. Eventually that shit trickles down.
The profound imbecility and insensitivity of Scott Morrison is breathtaking. That he considers we should be grateful that he and his government did not taken a leaf out of Myanmar’s playbook and mow down the protesters with live ammunition is one of the stupidest statements ever uttered by a politician in this democracy. He should resign immediately.
wishful thinking. With 80 media in this country supporting this government, and with the help of parties such as Palmer and Hanson, he is most likely be re-elected. What is the definition of democracy again?
According to the Rodent, “mob rule” – not that there is anything wrong with that, so long as it’s their Mob.
With that comment, Scott Morrison (the man who has perfect pitch when hearing ‘quiet Australians’ but no pitch at all for hearing rightly angry Australians) would have us believe that we should be paying due gratitude and deference to him because he alone prevented those righteous women from being shot for protesting his and his Government’s base-grade ineptitude.
Too many women are being bashed, sexually assaulted and yes, muse red by bullets – not at a protest but behind the closed doors he seems to favour.
A deeply offensive assertion from a deeply offensive man playing at being a Prime Minister.
*many by bullets
And yet, people still vote for the LNP. At least here in WA we tried to wipe them out of existence. Hopefully it extends to the federal level as well.
The proof will be in the pudding re WA when the Federal Election occurs. Let’s hope it wasn’t just adulation for a state premier. Historically, WA and QLD are the two states with the most ability to swing the Libs in or out.
Scummo and his clown troupe aren’t confused, they just don’t care. There’s no money on it for them or their mates, and the next election is far enough away for voters to have forgotten
And the claim that he didn’t read that letter ours an obvious lie. He must think we’re stupid. Oh, wait… they got elected, we are stupid
… is an obvious lie
I agree. A control freak like Morrison would need to know what he was up against. The letter must say enough to think there’s a basis to the rape claim and That could be a reason Morrison strenuously opposes an inquiry. If it was clear that the rapes never happened, I think that Morrison and Porter would embrace an inquiry.
And no one in his staff of 60 thought to make a copy of it before it was sent to the AFP. Yeah, right.
Nor, it is claimed, did the AFP make copies when they passed it on to NPOL as the appropriate agency.
Lest we forget!
That is the plain, simple fact of the matter.
Anyone making book on how long the current furore will last?
Or will… oh look, over there, something shiny or, throwing kids overboard, or taking tradies’ utes, or stealing tax rebates for taxes not paid.
Or donating cargo to Nui Guinea….