Paging through old newspapers, as your correspondent does incessantly, one is always struck by how differently we did things even a little while ago — the ability to illustrate any story with a pretty girl (this, for example, wouldn’t surprise: “Desley, 21, is pretty sharp, but she doesn’t like this Sharpeville massacre…”).
Another thing that catches the eye is a series of government advertisements for hospital chest X-rays for tuberculosis. These were not your government ads of today, all slogans and logos (“Staying apart keeps us together“), but simply a grid showing hospital locations and their catchment areas and hours open. Oh, and the bit at the top which noted that getting an X-ray was compulsory and rolls would be checked.
The governments of the day were determined to wipe out TB — correction: wipe out TB in non-Indigenous people, where it persists to this day — and so they just made ya do it. Like they made kids have the polio Sabin vaccine, sweet pink fluid on a tiny spoon. Lined up at school and just given it. There was a very occasional religious exemption, but that was it. Today the notes regarding anti-vax beliefs would knock out half the class.
Mass vaccination relied on three things. At the deepest level a sense of collective life, in which mutual obligation minimised notions of free-floating risk. That has now been atomised, so individual senses of risk separate from their actual likelihood. Second, a belief and trust in science as the frontier of human betterment; that the small number of people who were scientists and doctors were on the side of the masses, despite and because what they do was utterly incomprehensible to most. Finally, there was the regimentation of a mass society, in which lining up to do stuff — from kinder to school, to the Repco/Heinz/Ford factory — was just what most people did for most of their life.
Now a lethal pandemic has come and, in record time, vaccines to deal with it — and the society in which vaccines could be generally and universally circulated has collapsed underneath it. People are talking about some sort of government media campaign. (1. Nurse at empty mass vax centre, syringe in hand, “Where the bloody hell are you?”. No? OK, what about: 2. “Don’t kill him again” … cut to shot of Jesus on a cross made of two crossed enormous syringes. OK, OK. Back to the whiteboard.) But they’re talking about something along the lines of the anti-AIDS “grim reaper” campaign of the 1980s as a guide.
Well, the grim reaper TV ads were certainly effective, but mainly in causing a spike in violent homophobia. How much it actually did to promote safe sex, as opposed to the massive efforts of community mobilisation and appeals to plain common sense, is really unknown, no matter what the ad industry might claim.
But in any case, the notion that a grim reaper campaign would work today is fanciful. Such campaigns were the product of a mass society, but one at the end of its reign. Governments were finding resistance to the notion of the legitimate state and increasingly using a strategy we call “governmentality” — reaching into people’s selfhoods to shape their behaviour and, ultimately, the selfhood itself.
Now even that wouldn’t work, even if we had a prime minister and a government who weren’t focused entirely on media management. If 30% of people indicate they won’t take the vaccine, that goes way beyond the core of persistent anti-vaxxers.
Part of it may be an expression of the “free rider” problem — I’ll be protected if everyone else is, and avoid the small incidental risks — but I suspect it’s less calculated than that. This wider vaccine suspicion is fuelled by the more general atomisation of social life, in which families don’t feel they live in a society per se, but also by a subterranean spread of, if not suspicion, then alienation from science and abstract, invisible procedures that we are told are good for us.
In the great postwar progressive era, science was held to be on the side of humanity, its small priesthood serving us. Now science is tech; it’s the possession of a coming ruling class, and very much the master’s discourse.
Do you remember when we all just did what we were told to do? Let us know by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication in Crikey’s Your Say section.
If you concede that the only skill set which Morrison may have brought to the job of PM was marketing/sales, it is beyond ironic that his efforts to “market/sell” a vital vaccination program have been a total and abject failure. Not ironic, tragic.
Well, he was also a complete failure in his jobs at the Australian and New Zealand Tourism boards.
Morrison doesn’t ‘market’, he’s ‘marketed’.
He’s the ‘product’, not the ‘producer’.
He’s ‘sold’, not the ‘seller’.
Then I’d like to return $cotty. He doesn’t work. Faulty product.
Not fit for purpose.
And ask for your money back?
True, DT. The last thing his enablers want is an actual, effective leader.
Actually there is plenty of emprical evidence that he was a rather poor marketer. Seems little has changed.
Is there a better example of the “Peter Principle”?
Probably. ‘Peter Dutton’.
Dutton? Principles?
The Peter Dutton Principle.
You’re assuming Morrison even wants to lift the vaccination rate. It’s pretty clear that he’s changed his position to gain political mileage from ‘keeping people safe’ while he pushes the date for reopening borders into the fudgy future, ad infinitum; well at least till the next election’s been won. The justification is the very slow vaccination rate; and the pushing out of the border reopening only slows that down further when people think there’s no hurry. Catch 22, eh. Morrison said a couple of days ago about the vaccination numbers that he’s ‘not overly troubled…there’s plenty of time to have the chat with the others who are a bit hesitant, that’s alright, it’s a free country’. Doesn’t sound to me like he’s even trying with the ‘marketing job’.
With TBA, Polio, Diphtheria etc, the ravages of these diseases were all around us in our community and we were grateful for anything that could ward off the horror and protect our loved ones. But with Coronavirus we are the victims of our own success in that we feel safely cocooned in Australia, not too bothered about putting off the O/S trip for another year and a background thrum of ‘no new local transmissions’. We feel complacent, unthreatened and safe.
This complacency will change dramatically if there is a significant outbreak, rapid transmission, and grannies expiring all over the place as well as a few younger people. The dawdlers will suddenly be clamouring for an immediate appointment. At the moment the monster is in a cage ‘over there’. We can observe it’s impact impassively up to the point where someone forgets to lock the cage door. Ah, then we’ll drop our insouciant hesitancy and get with the program.
See Y2K, all that preparation and turned out to be nothing.
Nothing happening here, now with C19, ergo nothing will happen.
Until it does.
You are right. But the press is largely responsible for the reckless reporting. Many, if not most, people cannot comprehend odds and the manner of reporting amounted to a scare campaign.
Right.
So when they’re running a 24/7 global fear campaign around the virus it’s the unvarnished truth, but when they publicise a limited admission of serious side effects from the vaccine (which only occurred when it became to obvious to plausibly deny), it’s ‘reckless reporting’.
In the same way as when old people die after the vaccine it was because they were very old and had other serious conditions, but when they die after a positive coronavirus test, they were a healthy 86 year old with their whole lives ahead of them.
“The dawdlers will suddenly be clamouring for an immediate appointment.”
I can assure you that I would still refuse these vaccines if I had a gun pointed to my head, and unlike most people in this country I actually had quite a serious case of Covid last year, rather than just a serious case of hysteria from too much fear porn.
There might have been a lot more success with vaccinations, if the normal process for flu injections had been followed; GP’s Chemists, etc supported by a functional efficient vaccine supply chain…
P.S. had flu injection 3 weeks ago, still trying to organise a location for the Covid 19 vaccination…
I managed to book both flu and Covid shots in one phone call. My GP’s office sent me an sms saying flu shot was available. Had it last week and A-Z is booked for next Thursday.
As SSR notes below, the established method seems to be working well – at least in some places. But an early problem for the GPs was that they were receiving only 50 doses each week and setting up clinics for 10 patients per day is resource-, space- and time-intensive, especially since safe distancing must be observed in waiting rooms.
What on god’s green earth is wrong with you people, flu vaccines don’t stop flu and this covid crap is killing people all over the world, you sure as hell don’t need either let alone both
I am exactly in the same situation.
Depending on where you are, there are a number of mass vaccination hubs nearby which you can either book for or walk straight into. I went to book at my local doctor and was told I had to wait a month for the next available vaccination appointment. Yesterday I walked into the Exhibition Buildings and got it straight away. All very easy.
Yes -if you let the Woke Brigade know you had the jab -you get a flurry of Up ticks.
Reminds me of getting an Elephant Stamp at school as a reward.
The mind boggles!
Yes, it would have been possible to use the established methods, run by local and state entities who are known and familiar to the public and who understand what is required. But where’s the fun in that? If you are a minister who sees the chance to ignore all that and instead hand out some huge contracts to your corporate mates, it’s a no-brainer. Especially for a federal government with no brains and an ideological mania for privatising everything regardless of evidence, cost or dire consequences.
GPs and chemists would have had problems with -80 degrees leading to wastage. However the set-up now in place is user unfriendly. I went along for the shitjab and couldn’t even make an appointment for it. They sent me away feeling like a fool for not having a “link”. So I think that if you want the vaccine you must have an email address first.
No way GPs were going to pass up $30/jab
That was Morrison’s plan, and he screwed it up, so the states demanded mass migration centres as well.
I went to a mass migration centre.
It was empty.
4-5 patients to 50 bored & idle staff
The facilities exist, probably a good time to direct people to use them
I reckon if the mRNA vaccines were available to everyone, there wouldn’t be this problem. At least, it wouldn’t be as significant. The prob is AZ, blood clots, and the fact that there are other options perceived as safer which aren’t available to all, because of a fed. decisions to put the biggest bet on the wrong horse.
I’m a bit of an example . My modest tardiness to get the jab is based on two things. Firstly I was told that it would come to clinics in my rural area so where the bloody hell is it? I’ll get it when it arrives here. And secondly it’s obvious that no matter its efficacy, AZ is the grab bag one you get when the more important recipients have got theirs.
I have never had a flu shot despite when working in an industry which offered incentives due to public contact.
Most of my colleagues routinely came down with “mild” cases every season. I did not.
Recently I tried to use my Medicare card as ID – it had expired.
When getting a new one at Centrelink, slow but efficient, I asked why it had not been renewed automatically – it was in fact 3 biannual renewals out.
I was told that because I had not used a medical service for decades that my a/c had been suspended as suspect validity – apparently the average person visits a doctor more than 6 time pa.
Sorry, that was meant to explain my vaccine tardiness.
Nothing in sight but then, being a whole 150kms from the GPO, what can one expect?
Cynics like meself noted that Morrison and his over-50’s Co got the Pfizer jab, even though the AZ number was available to him and them. Then, turned around, and said ‘AZ it is, for the rest of YOU over 50’s.
Cynics like meself also like to look at what’s happening beyond these shores, which informs us the recorded adverse reactions go well beyond ‘rare blood clots’ (e.g. the weekly reports put out by the UK government).
We also note the number of places that have stopped administering the AZ jab, which range from provinces in Canada and Brazil, to Norway and Denmark.
And, we note that the EU has not placed any orders to succeed the ones that will see supply end in June/July.
recent data from UK comparing Az and Pfizer vaccines shows no difference in side effects, across thousands of recepients. Re blood clots, the Pfizer vaccine also cause thrombocytopenia, like the AZ vaccine, ie blood cell destruction, in rare cases. (USA data) Either way the seroius side effects are far rarer than everyday risks like driving a car, women taking the contraceptive pill etc.
Cut off ages for receiving AZ vaccine appear as much political as anything. For instance the UK reduced the age of receiving the AZ vaccine to increase vaccination uptake. By the way i cheerfully had the AZ vaccine.
Re less severe side effects such as sore arm, aches pains etc its interesting to note that the AZ vaccine has these reported after the first shot, whereas the Pfizer vaccine had a higher side effect profile after the second shot. My advice is get whatever is offered as its inevitable that covid will become established in our community in the intermediate term whether we open borders or not.
Totally agree and with Nina S.
But fuzzier than usual from Guy. If science was really losing its hold, how do you account for Victoria crushing the second wave via wide public buy-in? IMO that supposed 30% refusal rate is very soft, and most of them could be persuaded to get injected via the right show of leadership from Morrison et al. Unfortunately he doesn’t really do the L word.
I agree. I think its down to leadership and then getting the logistics right.
Winning an election can’t be confused with Leadership.