Scott Morrison’s and Angus Taylor’s furious reactions to the Brookfield/Mike Cannon-Brookes attempted takeover of AGL and their threats to use regulatory mechanisms to block it will open a new front in the war of independents against so-called Liberal moderates in metropolitan seats.
Self-described moderates like Dave Sharma, Jason Falinski, Trent Zimmerman, Tim Wilson — who is a spear carrier for Taylor in the energy portfolio — and whoever the NSW Liberals eventually find to stand against Zali Steggall in North Sydney, will face a simple question in the coming election campaign: do they back the efforts of Morrison, Taylor and Treasurer Josh Frydenberg to derail a takeover of AGL that would significantly accelerate the removal of its unreliable, expensive and dangerous coal-fired power stations?
Because of the involvement of Canadian firm Brookfield in the proposal, Morrison and Frydenberg can shut it down without any recourse or need for justification via the Foreign Investment Review Board, which operates with no rules, transparency or appeal rights.
There’s also the threat of the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) assessing the competition implications of the deal. Who’ll be running the ACCC from next month? The government’s hand-picked chair, former apparatchik of the climate denialist Murdoch family, Gina Cass-Gottlieb.
Any Morrison intervention to prevent an earlier shutdown of AGL’s ancient coal-fired power stations would be consistent with its efforts to prop up the fossil fuel technology. Taylor spent much of 2021 pushing for a special CoalKeeper tax on households that would pay fossil fuel power stations to keep operating even when their electricity wasn’t needed.
But an intervention wouldn’t merely be about Morrison’s obsessive support for fossil fuels to appease the climate denialists in his party and the Nationals. It would also be another red flag to genuine liberals in the Liberals’ heartland.
Party insiders talk of a deep voter antipathy towards Morrison in traditional Liberal seats over his attitude towards women, his high-spending, high-taxing government, and his lack of actual Liberal values — or for that matter any demonstrable values at all.
An intervention to prevent the market, and investors, from responding to the challenge of rapid decarbonisation would be yet another signal that this purportedly Liberal prime minister has abandoned both liberalism and core Liberal values of supporting a market economy and minimising state intervention.
The fact that it would be done with the goal of preventing climate action would make it doubly bad.
That’s why the proximity of the election makes the play by Brookfield and Cannon-Brookes so complex for Liberals in once-safe metropolitan seats. Does an MP like Jason “death taxes” Falinski in Mackellar back state intervention to block a free market response to his own government’s failures in energy policy? For that matter, what will Frydenberg tell voters in his seat after he has committed to blocking a takeover of AGL to keep coal-fired power plants going for up to two decades longer than the market believes they need to?
Frydenberg might also have to explain why he talks up Australia’s eagerness for international investment, but blocks investment if it doesn’t accord with his government’s pro-fossil fuel agenda. Call it “fossil risk”.
And remember that each coal-fired power station is responsible for scores of deaths a year from particulate pollution. AGL’s Bayswater coal-fired power station is responsible for 40 deaths a year, according to a 2018 study, along with an array of other health impacts.
The price of any state intervention to keep the plants operating comes with a human, as well as a climate, cost.
Should Morrison, Taylor and Frydenberg stand back and let the market decide? Let us know your thoughts by writing to letters@crikey.com.au. Please include your full name to be considered for publication. We reserve the right to edit for length and clari
Morrison/Liberals proving what unashamed hypocrites they are.
Making a mockery of their “can-do capitalism” and “market forces” propaganda
If
don’t oppose this, then it will be one more revelation of them as the useless hypocrites that they always were.
Actions speak louder than platitudes – how have they voted on the floor?
They’re asking their constituents to vote for them on the premise that they’ll get better “this time”? That these hyenas will change their spots and not toe the party line?????
……. How dumb do they think ‘their rubes(?)’ are?
I’d say ‘very‘ – as the electorate constantly demonstrate.
At the very least their selected elected representatives could show the good grace not to rub it in.
Only need to look at their voting record
They Vote For You — How does your MP vote?https://theyvoteforyou.org.au
Discover how your MP votes on the issues that matter to you
Doubt Wilson could be considered a moderate, except on matters of SSM
Very true, but I suspect there are a lot of other hypocrites in these key seats: voters who will support environmental protection in an abstract sense but, when they get to the ballot box, will always vote for the party who’ll give them slightly lower taxes.
Mike Cannon-Brookes said in an interview earlier today that his plan would create jobs not just in traditional coal communities but in other regions as well. Are the Nationals opposing job creation in rural Oz?
Apparently Morrison likes certain capitalists but not all capitalists.
They are showing their true colours. The scare campaigns follow immediately – lights go off (don’t have to), price goes up (doesn’t have to as renewables are cheaper generation and will continually to get more so even when firmed to be dispatchable by storage).
Sadly, the bulk of the MSM will swiftly cover up as usual and there is the $31 million in taxpayer’s money for the dishonest but jaunty ‘positive energy’ ads that will hold sway to far too many.
The Cannon-Brooks(MCB)/Brookfield bid for AGL is designed by MCB as a missile aimed directly at the heart of coalition hypocrisy, incompetence and cowardice. And the bid exposes the ‘market’ and any of the public paying attention the rank stupidity of the AGL de-merger and the feet of clay of the fossils on the AGL board. The bid does not even have to be accepted to succeed in this objectives. It has already achieved that. It is a genuinely brilliant move by MCB who could not have brought Brookfield on board without convincing business plan to both de-carbonise Australia’ biggest polluter and make it more profitable and robust into the future. If the bid is ultimately accepted (and it may well be), MCB and Brookfield will make a pile. And if it is ultimately rejected, the fossils on the AGL board will have to follow the MCB investment plan or oversee the rapid decline in value of a fossilised business. Checkmate!