Nick Griffin, leader of Britain’s fascist party, had his one-hour of fame last night (Thursday) when he appeared as a guest on BBC1’s prestigious Question Time program chaired by David Dimbleby.
Before the show was pre-recorded, more than 300 police held back angry, placard-waving protesters from the Unite Against Fascism group who had descended on the BBC’s Television Centre in west London.
The screening went ahead despite an appeal to the BBC Board of Governors by Cabinet minister Peter Hain, the Welsh Secretary and former anti-aparthied campaigner who led the 1970s protests against the Springboks.
His approach was rejected on the grounds that the BBC had “a charter responsibility” to allow the voices of elected representatives. The BNP had two candidates elected to the European Parliament earlier this year, including Griffin.
The great TV debate was a miserable catastrophe for Griffin who, capitalising on the publicity, was supposed to deliver a coherent, engaging and acceptable version of his sometimes questionable, highly xenophobic, platform.
Instead, Question Time presented the British public with a reborn Alf Garnett with none of the comic satire of Warren Mitchell.
Instead of inspiring an anti-immigrant pogrom from his followers in the whites-only taverns of Essex, the Cambridge University law graduate tried to placate his critics with all kinds of bromides about respect and tolerance. You were left with the distinct feeling that Griffin is a chancer, a mountebank who is riding the anti-immigration public opinion polls.
His presentation is so lightweight it’s difficult to see him emerging as the leader of a major neo-Nazi force, which is what the political hysterics are predicting.
Dominic Carman, author of a forthcoming unauthorised biography who has spent weeks with the BNP leader and recorded 20 hours of interviews, told the Daily Mail that Griffin was “dangerous and deranged”. He was a man “whose personal Utopia is for every white Briton to embrace national socialism, Griffin-style, and for every non-white Briton to leave these islands”.
He has described himself as a “Strasserist” basing himself on one of Hitler’s earliest lieutenants, Gregor Strasser, and also saying: “There is a strong direct link from Oswald Mosley to me.”
Mosley, whose political adventurism carried him from the Tory Party to the Labour Party and then to the leadership of the British Union of Fascists in the 1930s, was interned during World War Two for his pro-Hitler sympathies. Now Griffin is draping himself in the imagery of Winston Churchill, using his photographs and wartime speeches to implant himself in the political consciousness of disillusioned and depressed Brits.
Griffin, who was delighted by the BBC’s decision to give him free time on national television telling Rupert Murdoch’s Times “Thank you Auntie”, evaded questions about the Holocaust on Question Time last night, but we know from his unofficial biographer Carman that he believes, “Yes, Adolf went a bit too far.”
With a British general election scheduled within the next six months the electorate is being softened up to accept that one of the new voices on the hustings will be Griffin’s BNP, a party that raised one million votes in the European elections.
After three terms of New Labour, it’s salutary to recognise its legacy: a society with ever-widening divisions between the richest and the poorest, an unwinnable war in Afghanistan, the traumatic, costly and failed invasion of Iraq and a buoyant homegrown fascist movement. Thank you Mr Blair. God bless you.
With an eye on Google, Crikey intern Aaron Flanagan reports:
Mark Thompson, the director-general of the BBC, said he would not stop Griffin’s appearance on Question Time.
“If there is a case for censorship, it should be debated and decided in Parliament,” he said. “Political censorship cannot be outsourced to the BBC or anyone else.”
Griffin sat on a panel that included Jack Straw, the Justice Secretary, Baroness Warsi, the Tory spokesman on community cohesion, Chris Huhne, the Liberal Democrats’ home affairs spokesman, and Bonnie Greer, a black American playwright.
The Guardian dubbed Griffin as the Dr Stangelove of British politics due to his adoption of Winston Churchill as a model for personal comparison and described the panel discussion as “passionate”.
The Daily Telegraph led its coverage with accusations from his critics describing him as a Nazi who had shared public forum platforms with the Ku Klux Klan.
The Independent’s editorial said that his performance on the influential program exposed his Holocaust denial and his links with Ku Klux Klan.
The Sun, pulled no punches and editorialised Griffin as “racist BNP leader Nick Griffin” and described his views as “‘vile and bigoted”. It invited readers to comment about his performance on the program.
And that is why those fools protesting outside were a waste of time.
The BBC did more damage to the BNP with this interview opportunity than the protesters did or would have done in a decade.
The cleansing sunlight of public exposure and scrutiny is a wonderful method of dealing with extremists from each end of the political spectrum.
The BBC not only did damage to an extremist organisation, but did so in a manner that was within their charter and reinforced their freedom of speech credentials.
In effect they gave Griffin the rope to hang himself, which he duly did.
Its a shame that something similar was not done here for Pauline Hanson and One Nation, rather than demanding that she be ignored, let them appear and be seen for the unrepresentative extremists that they are.
Bravo BBC!
Where any of the Newspapers the condemmed him owned by Murdock,given theres not much difference from what the BNP puts out and a large percentage of what FOXS NEWS does.
Glad Michael thinks giving this bloke free air time will do him no good,look at the uproar here over the boat people, I have spoken to a lot of Poms here and they think the BNP is right,if they win seats in the British Parliament what then?
Well, the Independent, linked on the front page of Crikey, points out that the interview was a disaster for both Griffin and the BNP.
As for the Murdoch papers, try
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6886436.ece
Unfortunately my work server blocks the News of the World and the Sun, but I doubt they support Griffin either.
As for the BNP winning seats, One Nation did as well. Now look at them.
You can, in history books.
Whilst I agree New Labour’s legacy is appalling whats even more worrying is that all those things described would have been exactly the same under a Tory government.
Does anyone for one moment think that a Tory government wouldn’t have enthusiastically joined and supported the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq or that they would have helped close income gaps.
The problem Britian faces is that they now basically have 2 political parties that have effectively the same failed policies.
One Nation were a flash in the pan party that largely owed their support to Hanson’s personal popularity and the media circus that surrounded her (I know that’s a simplification, but…). The BNP and their predecessors have a much longer history and have been organised to a certain extent for most of that time.
The Sun and co. may have been bashing Griffin today, but they’re usually running articles about how immigrants are getting better Council Housing than the locals or whipping up hysteria about the burka or just engaging in garden-variety Muslim-bashing. We all know what he is, especially in light of his recent appearance, but the question is, do his supporters?