The March issue of Quadrant is out with a response from editor Keith Windschuttle to the hoax affair that made his previous issue a best seller, writes <b>Margaret Simons</b>.
This morning I was released from my obligations of confidentiality. I can now report for the first time that the speculation has it right, writes <b>Margaret Simons</b>.
It sh-ts me that some of the media outlets are comparing this hoax to the frauds committed by Norma Khouri and Helen Darville/Demidenko/Dale, writes <b>Sharon Gould</b>.
I am trying to decide which part of the 24 hours since Crikey published news of the “Sharon Gould” hoax has been the most bizarre, writes <b>Margaret Simons</b>.
Windschuttle didn't need to suspect anything was amiss to do proper editor's duty on the Sharon Gould piece, writes <b>Guy Rundle</b> from Mexico City.
Revisiting one of <em>Crikey</em>'s biggest scoops: the revelation that <em>Quadrant</em> editor Keith Windschuttle had been taken in by a hoax.
Which PM rang up <em>Crikey</em> and swore like a trooper? Which very high-profile News Corp writer told a <em>Crikey</em> ed: "the ABC is disgraced by your presence"? The trials and tribulations of one of the best jobs on the internet.
Keith Windschuttle's appearance in last week's <i>Oz Spectator</i> may be the first example of Howard-era retro-chic, in an article focused obsessively on the 2002 film <em>Rabbit-Proof Fence</em>
Recent events at UK magazine <em>The Spectator</em> tell us a lot about the cynical way in which climate change scepticism is used to sell to the right.
In this month's <em>Quadrant</em>, David Free has an interesting take on Clive James's latest collection of essays...