The release of the Chilcot Inquiry in the United Kingdom is a vivid reminder that those responsible for Australia’s participation in the Iraq War have never been properly held to account.
That war and the subsequent occupation has cost hundreds of thousands of Iraqi lives, in addition to the thousands of US and allied personnel killed during the occupation and the waste of what will in the long run total perhaps US$4 trillion, for the achievement of complete destabilisation of the region, the rise of Islamic State, the dominance of the theocratic butchers of Iran over Iraq and a massive increase in the terrorist threat to Western countries.
The only inquiries held in Australia have examined the role played by intelligence agencies — a 2004 inquiry by the precursor to the current Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security into intelligence about Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction, which had very limited access to the documents provided to the government by the intelligence community, and an inquiry by public service veteran Philip Flood into intelligence agencies.
At no stage have the roles of then-prime minister John Howard and his foreign minister, Alexander Downer, been scrutinised. In particular, what commitments Howard and Downer made to the the Bush administration and the Blair government over Australia’s role, and what those two men, and their cabinet, knew about what is now on record as the deliberate lies by the Bush administration about Saddam Hussein’s WMDs.
Coalition governments continue to involve Australia in military interventions in the Middle East that make us less safe from the threat of terrorism, with no accountability. It is time that Howard and Downer and their colleagues were subjected to the same kind of scrutiny as Tony Blair and his cronies. It’s time for a royal commission into the decision to join the disastrous invasion and occupation of Iraq.
This report churns me up and reminds me how I resigned from the ALP ( I’m back!) when Bob Hawke took us into a Middle -East war without Parliament approval –and how I marched with millions against the Howard /Downer unexamined Oz entry into war in Iraq. In vain. I still wear the shirt WAR IS NOT THE ANSWER. Politicians must take responsibility .
Agree, they must take responsibility. You wonder what decisions would be made if any of their children were involved.
A predetermined course that the politicians responsible then went out to shop for excuses to justify that course (with our Honest John Howard and his fire-walls of ignorance) – then sent troops off to fight their war with sub-standard gear.
Then there was the vilification of Wilkie – by both the Howard government and Limited News – for having the temerity to question that course.
And that Limited News Party khaki pin-up boy Molan will be on The Dum tonight – to give us an “insiders” analysis of what went on?
Make sure you’re wearing a rain-coat?
Why have an inquiry in Oz? We have seen the tragic outcome of how downright stupid it was to become inveigled in Bush’s butchering – but will politicians ever take heed? John Howard, busy dodging evidence & advice from the ONA, took the opportunity to preen as a guest at the Bush ranch & was suddenly able to boast, on first name terms, a camaraderie with the world’s most powerful man (albeit the thickest).
The inner-circle of ultimate power – an elitist club, an addictive lure which will always be effective amongst the ego-driven. No inquiry will prevent repetition.
@Zut Alors
I think the best reason to have an inquiry is to fire the proverbial ‘shot over the bows’ of those who, in the future, may wish to indulge in the same blood soaked approach to international relations.
While for many, including myself, the thought of retribution to those perpetrators is a contributing factor, it should not be used as the reason for the inquiry (Royal Commission, please). I would like to see it as the beginning of a new process that takes us to war if time is not of the issue based on a full parliamentary sitting and community debate.
I’m afraid Zut has nailed it. We already know what happened, and the chances of any inquiry bring anyone to account, or prevent future repetition are zero.
Depressing, but that’s just the political reality.
Paddy…it is also the legal reality it seems.
I heard Geoffrey Robertson QC on ABC radio this morning…there was no international law in place at the time to stop the aggressive war waged by Bush, Blair and Howard. The specific laws had already been suspended to allow an upgrade and redrafting. The laws do now exist, but there is no provision for retrospectivity.
Therefore, no number of inquiries/findings will bring these ‘war criminals’ to justice. What’s the bet they already knew that when they decided to go ahead with the Iraq invasion?