As I write this, Russia is firmly in the grip of the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Every day, there are about 22,000 reported new infections — twice as many as during the peak of the first wave in May 2020 — and more than 600 deaths.
The new Delta variant of the virus, which Moscow Mayor Sergey Sobyanin says is responsible for 90% of new infections in the Russian capital, has caught Russia almost completely unawares. Despite having access to the brain power and resources of one of the most technologically advanced nations in the world, Russian authorities have repeatedly squandered almost every chance to beat the pandemic. Their massive, bloated propaganda apparatus failed to do the one job it was designed for: get the message out.
Instead, the pandemic has exacerbated the crisis of trust between the Russian government and citizens. Now, the campaign for parliamentary elections in September could make fighting the pandemic even harder, since the ruling United Russia party may be even more reluctant to impose unpopular measures such as lockdowns.
Russian independent observers and journalists — including me and my colleagues at Meduza — already knew something was terribly off with Russia’s handling of the pandemic in late spring of 2020. We had looked at the numbers and recognised that COVID-19 deaths were being underreported in many regions of Russia. According to the official statistics at the time, tens of thousands of Russians were dying in 2020 of a mysterious pneumonia epidemic unrelated to COVID-19. This was hardly plausible. The more likely explanation: Russian regional authorities were writing off the majority of COVID-19 cases as “community-acquired pneumonia”.
There is no evidence of a cover-up ordered from the top. More likely, regional governorates were simply being discreet to avoid being the bearer of bad news to the Kremlin. Underreporting COVID-19 cases in the early stages of the pandemic plausibly made many Russians question the existence of the virus or lulled them into a false sense of security, although there is no poll data to back this up. What’s certain is that by November 2020, according to independent polling institute Levada, the majority of Russians did not trust their government’s COVID-19 figures: 33% thought them too low, while 28% believed they were exaggerated.
The next time I felt a sense of foreboding was in early December 2020, when I called my local clinic during the start of the Sputnik V vaccine rollout. At the time, only certain categories of frontline workers were eligible. However, vaccine uptake was so slow that the clinic told me it didn’t matter that I wasn’t prioritised — and asked if I could turn up right now. And so I did, and became one of the first Russians vaccinated with Sputnik V. I was down with a flu-like fever and fatigue for a couple of days after each of the two required doses, but recovered without any complications. I am now protected against the virus with an impressive level of spike protein antibodies. I still maintain social distancing whenever possible, avoid large public gatherings, and wear a mask.
Astonishingly, six months later I am part of only a tiny minority of Russians who have chosen to be vaccinated — or managed to be, amid a chronic shortage of vaccine doses. Off to an early start with its own vaccine, Russia is now severely lagging behind. At the time of writing, about 12% are fully vaccinated, while another 4.7% have received a single dose — a much lower vaccination rate than China and Brazil, let alone most of the developed world.
And Russians are steadfast in their anti-vaccine convictions: according to a recent Morning Consult poll, Russia now has one of the highest levels of vaccine skepticism in the world, with 35% saying they are unwilling to get vaccinated. Even the United States, where vaccine skepticism is rampant, has only 19% committed anti-vaxxers.
Recently the Kremlin admitted that its original goal to vaccinate 60% of the population by September will be unachievable, according to a report by TV Rain. Instead, the government has settled for a more realistic 30%.
In fact, the situation is so dire that some of Russia’s regions are already reintroducing lockdowns. In Moscow, city authorities have ordered compulsory vaccinations for certain categories of public servants and service industry workers and barred unvaccinated people from entering bars and restaurants. Not that Russians are easily cowed: there is now a booming black market for fake vaccination certificates. There are also reports of Russians paying bribes to have their vaccine dose discarded and be injected with saline solution instead.
None of this should come as a surprise. Instead of promoting safety measures and campaigning to get the public vaccinated, Russian state-owned media have spent an inordinate amount of time ridiculing other nations for their harsh lockdowns — which Russia never imposed — and trashing their vaccines. Not that Russians have much of a choice over which jab to get: only the domestically produced Sputnik V, EpiVacCorona, and Covivac vaccines are permitted for use in Russia. One of these, EpiVacCorona, has been embroiled in a constant stream of scandal and skepticism about its efficacy and has been all but publicly accepted as a dud.
Television news programs and state news agencies, such as RIA Novosti, have gleefully amplified every complication and casualty from vaccines produced by BioNTech-Pfizer, Moderna, and AstraZeneca, and gloated over every development hiccup. Unsurprisingly, vaccine skepticism is so rampant at these media outlets that the CEO of state news agency Rossiya Segodnya sent out a company-wide memo pleading with employees to get vaccinated and avoid the fate of three of their colleagues who died in intensive care in Moscow during a single week.
Meanwhile, Russian foreign broadcaster RT has been feeding Western audiences with anti-vaxxer conspiracy theories, comparing lockdowns and other restrictions to the Nazi occupation and apartheid. That same twisted rhetoric is now spreading in Russia: on June 22, Egor Beroev, a prominent Russian TV and film actor, spoke at an awards ceremony and gave an impassioned defence of unvaccinated Russians, who he claimed were being “segregated” from the rest of the society like the Jews under the Nazis. To drive the point home, Beroev wore a yellow six-pointed star. His speech was met with applause. Similar stars adorned the T-shirts of protesters picketing the campaign headquarters of the ruling United Russia party in Moscow to protest against mandatory vaccinations.
Among Russians, the reasons for refusing to be vaccinated vary — some will mention that Sputnik V was rushed through development and approved before phase III trial data was available. Others will insist that they don’t need any vaccines since they’ve already recovered from COVID-19. More cling to a motley array of conspiracy theories involving the Antichrist or a secret cabal seeking to make Russians infertile.
Russia’s vaccine skeptics are found all over society; their ranks include Russian Orthodox right-wingers, centre-left parliamentary leaders, and anti-Putin activists. If there were an anti-vaccine party, it would easily beat United Russia in the upcoming elections.
Not all unvaccinated Russians subscribe to conspiracy theories or are influenced by the example of top government officials who don’t wear a mask in public, let alone get a jab on national television. Sometimes there are simply not enough doses, especially in Russia’s far-flung regions. Back in December, when the first batch of Sputnik V arrived in Argentina, some Russians were grumbling that there were more Russian vaccines available in Buenos Aires than major Russian cities.
In fact, less than one month after Argentina became the first foreign country to adopt Sputnik V in December 2020, it had more people vaccinated with the Russian vaccine than all of Russia outside of Moscow, according to Russian independent news site Mediazona.
Even now, the Argentinian Ministry of Health’s reports are the most extensive source of information about Sputnik V’s safety. And they confirm what the Russian government has failed to convey to its own citizens: Russia’s primary vaccine is indeed safe and effective.
Today, however, Argentina is unhappy about its arrangement with Russia: as of late June, it has only received a fraction of the number of doses that had been promised to be delivered by March. So instead of Russia’s international image getting a boost, Moscow’s attempt at vaccine diplomacy has turned into another flop.
According to Bloomberg, as of mid-June, Russia has only delivered 17 million doses of almost 900 million promised to its clients around the world. Argentina and Mexico are already turning to other vaccine producers. And on June 29, Guatemala also embarrassed Russia by demanding a refund on its advance payment for an undelivered batch of Sputnik V. (One day later, Guatemalan Health Minister Amelia Flores clarified that the country was seeking to renegotiate with Russia and was not yet asking for a refund. On July 4, Flores’s ministry confirmed receipt of 200,000 doses of Sputnik V.)
But instead of addressing the logistical issues obstructing deliveries — problems that were visible from early on — Sputnik V distributor Russian Direct Investment Fund and its CEO Kirill Dmitriev instead complained about the international media’s alleged bias against the Russian vaccine.
Now that measures like restricting restaurant visits to the fully vaccinated (in effect in Moscow since June 28) and mandatory vaccinations for workers in certain industries (implemented in several regions) are finally under way, the abysmally low vaccine uptake will probably get a boost.
But the sudden tightening of pandemic policies following many months of inconsistency and lack of positive examples is damaging the already low confidence and trust in the government. Even as restaurants are now off-limits to most Russians, public gatherings for thousands of people are apparently fine. Masks are mandatory on public transport — but not in the State Duma or at United Russia campaign rallies. No wonder that even during the current wave of the pandemic, barely half the passengers in a packed metro car in Moscow were wearing them during one of my recent trips.
There are signs that some Russians are at least thinking about getting more serious about the pandemic. Now that there is picketing against the new health measures in Moscow, the same state television that led the cheerleading about anti-lockdown protests in London, Paris, and Brussels is suddenly mute about similar protests in Russia. In a sombre tone, the commentators are now urging their audiences to get vaccinated as soon as possible. But Russia’s terrible numbers don’t lie: by now, these efforts are too little, too late.
Alexey Kovalev is an investigative editor at Meduza. He tweets at @Alexey__Kovalev

Back in the eighties I was both amazed and bemused by the outlandish and weird conspiracy and superstitious views many otherwise rational and well educated Soviet people held. It was plausibly explained as a result of living in a country having few credible ruling institutions and media outlets. Distrust of authorities merged with distrust of official information and all sorts of rumour, wish fulfilment and fantasy filled the gap. Glasnost was a breath of fresh air but the openness paradoxically let the outlandishness bloom.
Cut to today and Russia’s kleptocratic regime has resumed the substitution of propaganda for information and so of course the population is sceptical and reliant on wish fulfilment and (social media) word of mouth. Russia is also not a country where the authorities have much reason to care a lot about the well-being of the population. Now of course these observations are not inapplicable, to varying degrees, to Australia or the USA but it is much worse there. We do have institutions and people within them that battle with forces of corruption, incompetence and negligence. Whereas these forces have much freer rein in Russia, where they are themselves often institutionalised.
Russians are born sceptical, with a distrust of authority. You really have to make an effort to get most Russians on-side, and the Russian government is woefully inadequate at PR….
Don’t disagree at all, their history has been building it in for centuries with odd window of openness. What did find ironic was, that in the 1990s one of things there was great thirst for was Western education and expertise in journalism (good) and strategic communications (not so good). The young Russian graduates could run rings around the old Soviet agitprop apparatchiks. I thought of it as the rise of a proper modern hegemonic system. Come the descent into robber barons and the revanchist state under Putin they have come into their own as engineers of a hybrid of hegemony built into soft authoritarianism. It’s chaotic and often inadequate, but still much more sophisticated than the old Soviet agitprop that lived in a centralised monopoly. Putin now presides over something like a state sanctioned super-charged Murdoch hegemony. It frames debates, deflects and distracts, omits, campaigns and punishes. There is competition from other voices but they are both marginal and used as props for propaganda victories that yes, opposition does exist, Russia does have free media.
Agree, and would also add that conspiracy theories and misinformation are not unique to Russia but abound across Central Eastern Europe, the Balkans, Turkey and onwards…. all have had a background of several generations of state ordained ‘secularism’ versus established mainstream religions.
On one hand it’s intended symptom of state or government ‘communications’ or agitprop, to especially distrust anything not state or govt. ordained, but also used by individuals to rationalise their own ignorance (even amongst educated) or fears of calling out authority, and has emerged especially in the US which then influences others elsewhere.
While proponents of radical right libertarian socio-economic ideology in the US GOP understand that the same policies would not be palatable to voters, hence, need for building ‘conservative’ coalitions of white Christian nationalists, evangelicals etc. in increasingly secular cohorts of younger populations, conspiracy theories can also be leveraged to expand the ‘coalition’ to vite the right way.
Totally agree with you AP7, and yet……there is something more worrying going on here, which I don’t fully
understand. It’s got nothing to do with conspiracy theories, which I believe are all nonsensical, but
rather with the human attraction for these theories. Just look at the number of people in the US who
still believe that Trump won the last election!
Closer to home, you can see many Crikey commentators who believe there is no real difference between
a dictatorship like China and democratic governments. Maybe you can explain that to me some time.
That’s the thing about weaponizing conspiracy theories. Like weaponizing diseases or chemicals, you can occasionally be bitten by the beast you’ve just released.
The belief in all ex-socialist countries that the West has the best of everything works well with becoming an anti-vaxxer in Russia. Their social media (as everywhere in the world) is full of misleading information.
On the matter of short supply, I wonder whether anti-vaxxers can be employed to damage the vaccine in production – how can every dose be checked for accuracy? This question I would apply to all nations producing vaccines.
Pity that geo politics means a good vaccine (sputnik V) cannot be used together with other (Western produced) vaccines to inoculate the world faster.
Am I naive because I’ve come to the conclusion that pharma profits are the only goal with the vaccine rollouts?
Note that the AZ vaccine is produced at cost and sold as such as a public service by that company. CSL does not pay license fees to produce the AZ vaccine. Thats why the massive cost difference between AZ and Pfizer. (roughly 2.80 per dose versus 30.00 per dose). So the argument about pharma profits has a flaw. Rather would you prefer not to have a vaccine and let the virus just rip through society?
Thank you for the clarification.
You’re being too polite to this Turkey.
“Rather would you prefer not to have a vaccine and let the virus just rip through society?”
What a self serving response -but “The obedient always think of themselves as virtuous rather than cowardly.”
The virtue signaling around the vaccines is growing increasingly bizarre.Why should anyone take an experimental mRNA vaccine for a virus that 99.7% of people outside of nursing homes will easily survive?
Variant: something 99.7% identical to an original thing, but with a scary name and good PR e.g. “the quadrupal super-deadly [insert random geographical location] superspreader variant”
Vaccine: Traditionally a preparation of dead viral matter introduced to stimulate immune response and prevent infection – but now not so much that.
No reply needed, James’ response should have been moderated out…Crikey is no place for antivax nut jobs.
No – you are not naive – you are being sensable. Being older has the advantage of knowing to question everthing & especially from Govt & a media blitz of misinformation.
Aside from above it was heartening that a lot of Russians are being careful about taking any Vax. No doubt reading about adverse effects with other Vaccines has contributed & rightly so. Deaths & injuries from these Covid mRNA vaccines is very real – https://tinyurl.com/6cnysuxp “The latest on covid vaccine adverse events ” – -It explores both pros & Cons and has factual information that should be available to all. It should be noted that while there are Govt reporting sites it is estimated that well less than 10% of adverse reactions are reported. Also the MSM is withholding this information. Please read with an open & questioning mind.
Don’t know why the bolding above happened – – my bad 🙂
The story is chillingly similiar to our own disastrous roll out. Are they reading each others emails?