The Liberal Party is running a snappy advertising campaign on TV and social media called “Look at the facts”. Overprinted at the top is the claim “Australia’s recovery is leading the world”.
The 30-second video makes nine assertions. According to my count, one is correct, two are substantially deceptive and six are blatant lies. Here’s my examination of each claim.
‘Australia’s recovery is leading the world’
The first graph depicts “GDP compared to pre-COVID”, indicating this refers to economic growth. But claiming Australia is still a leader on this metric is quite false.
For country comparisons, economists use annual GDP growth, which is recorded for all advanced economies four times a year. We have the numbers for the 2021 December quarter for the 59 very highly developed countries listed by the UN’s Development Program (UNDP). These include all OECD members and most International Monetary Fund advanced economies. Australia’s modest 4.2% annual GDP growth ranks 43rd out of those 59 economies. Nowhere near leading the world.
The UK, Denmark, Italy, the Netherlands, Singapore, Estonia, Poland, Hungary and Greece are all above 6%. Ireland, Israel, Malta, Chile, Slovenia, Croatia, Turkey and others are above 9%.
The fine print in the Liberal chart says “Dec 2019 to Dec 2021”. Hmmm. So it picked an odd two-year time interval for which there is no readily available global database. Why? Could it be that its December 2019 starting point was a particularly disastrous low, with Australia then in a per capita recession — before COVID?
Even if we take that weird two-year interval, Australia still lags badly. Yes, Australia’s GDP rose 3.39% from December 2019 to December 2021, so that figure is accurate. But the others appear fabricated.
The Bureau of Economic Analysis clearly shows the US rise was 10.6%, not 3.2%. Similarly, data for France shows GDP increased 4.27% over the two years, not 0.9%. UK data shows a 5.91% lift since 2019, not a decline.
Damningly, the chart leaves out all advanced economies with higher growth than Australia’s. These include Ireland, Norway, Sweden, Estonia, Taiwan, Chile and Turkey.
Of course, we can see why it would go with the falsehood “Australia’s economy is leading the world”. The truth — Australia ranks 43th out of 59 advanced economies — doesn’t have quite the same ring to it.
But why would it falsify the data when it knows the economics writers at The Australian Financial Review and The Australian will eviscerate it for the blatant deceptions? Oh, wait…
‘Through the pandemic we’ve had fewer deaths … than almost any advanced country’
That was once true, but not since the bungled vaccine rollout and the disastrous mismanagement of federal nursing homes.
Australia has lost 4434 lives to COVID this year at a rate of 170 per million. That ranks a dismal 18th among our 59 advanced nations.
The graph in the video above compares Australia with cherry-picked countries close to the epicentres in Europe and the US. A more valid comparison, I would argue, is with advanced nations far from those countries, and using current figures.
‘Less debt than almost any advanced country’
Just an absolute barefaced falsehood. The IMF shows general government gross debt as a percentage of GDP for all 59 advanced economies. Easily accessed. In 2012, Labor’s last full year, Australia’s debt was 27.5% of GDP and ranked ninth in that list. Not bad. By 2021, debt had ballooned to 62.1%, ranking a miserable 30th. Hence, 29 advanced economies now have less debt than Australia.
‘And more jobs growth than almost any advanced country’
Untrue. When the Coalition won office in 2013, Australia’s jobless rate ranked sixth among OECD member countries. (These are the 38 big free-enterprise economies among the 59 advanced nations.) Australia now ranks a modest 14th, having been overtaken by eight more nations.
The Liberal graph again compares Australia with seven non-comparable nations and ignores the advanced economies beating Australia. These include Norway, which improved employment by 3.11%, Argentina by 3.3%, Cyprus 3.7%, Israel 4.1%, New Zealand 4.3%, the Netherlands 4.5%, Denmark 5.3% and Malta 5.9%.
‘The Liberal government is building a stronger economy…’
No it isn’t. In 2013, Australia had the world’s best performing economy. It now ranks well outside the world’s top 20. “All-time worst” economic outcomes since Morrison became treasurer in 2015, as reported by Crikey and others, now number 60.
‘… With lower taxes’
This would make Donald Trump blush. Last month’s budget papers showed that from 1969 onwards tax to GDP has been much higher under the Liberals. The highest-taxing administration was John Howard’s. Morrison’s was second highest.
‘… Lower unemployment’
Yes, the headline jobless rate is lower. But you could argue that is due to migration shifting into reverse, to thousands of “workers” on one hour or zero hours a month, and to the blow-out in the public service — not a strong economy.
‘… More apprentices’
Apprenticeship numbers have recovered slightly in the past year, but from a low base. Relative to population, apprentices in 2017 and 2018 were the lowest in two decades.
‘… More funding for health and other essential services’
This claim is correct. But that’s due to higher population and the larger budget relative to 2013, not sound management.
There we have it. Nine bold claims under the shameless heading “Look at the facts”. Eight of them are easily disproven by current data from the government’s own departments.
Two questions arise: will any mainstream economics reporters do their job and expose these? And will the whoppers succeed again in returning the Coalition?
Someone called Bazza put this in the Comments on the SMH
Short History of Australian Economy in World
2007 – Labor takes Government 9th in world
2008 – 3rd in world
2009 – 1st in world
2013 – LNP takes Government 1st
2014 – 3rd in world
2015 – 9th in world
2016 – 13th in world
2017 – 18th in world
2018 – 21st in world
2019 – 28th in the world.
Sorry…… but did Morrison & his cohorts say something about they are the best with the economy? Their scorecard does not support that.
That is based on the IAREM – the Independent Australia Ranking on Economic Management.
Easily found at Independent Australia.
Maybe by “the economy” they mean the wealth of their supporters and party members . The PMs wealth has increased by in excess of $20 million in the coalitions time in office and many other liberal members have also inreased their nett wealth dramatically
When the other corrupt Liberal Government in NSW took office – the Askin Government – Askin said to his Liberal MP’s “We are in the lolly shop now, boys”. I think that as far as Liberal MP’s are concerned they have no idea of what being a Public Servant actually is all about. Such people as the Liberal/National MP’s would make lousy Nurses or Teachers, and indeed, would never go into one of those professions which require selfless dedication to a greater good.
Obviously have been used as role models for the current Coalition cabinet .
An ICAC at that time would have resulted in a change of government as most of the Liberal government would have ended up in the slammer( much the same now)
The PM’s salary would not account for this dramatic increase in wealth. Where does it come from?
And the average voter has seen his wages depreciated by 10 to 20% compared to the increase in the cost of living .Sounds a bit like Marie Antoinette .The PM says if you need more money get a better job, she said let them eat cake .All I want is for the PM to lose his seat not his neck
Yes, but try to get the MSM to admit that and convince the majority of the electorate that what they believe is bs.
Easy to see why Trump and Morrison seemed to be getting on well. The truth is not a strong part of their character.You only have to believe it seemed to be the right thing to say at the time as opposed to any real truth that is as we all know is” Fake News”
It is s pity there is not a dedicated and serious count concerning the mendacity of Smirko and His Brethren taking place here DownUnder
Following how WaPo ran a count for over 30,000 for The Radge Orange Bampot*, as the canny Scots have him, for by all accounts Smirko is well into Pinocchio territory.
*Parliamo Glasgow?
Thanks a lot for your article Alan. I do hope the papers and television take this up. I won’t hold my breath though. On the other hand, could Albo start landing a few punches? “If you’re record was so good you wouldn’t have to lie about it…” etc. I live in hope.
This kind of blatant dishonesty in election advertising is fraud pure and simple. Deception to gain financial advantage. Isn’t that against the LAW? Isn’t there SOMEONE to take them to task for it? Can’t SOMEONE bring criminal charges for fraud?
No. Nothing to stop them. We definitely need truth in political advertising. We need law reform and extremely unlikely to get it under SM.
Apparently when it comes to truth in political advertising Australia is a banana republic. The AEC says they can’t do anything about lies and other tricks designed to mislead voters. How is that even possible in a ‘developed’ country and a so-called ‘democracy’. It’s outrageous. It’s also quite telling that on the whole the electorate seems fine with that. I think it has something to do with the fact that most Australians can’t stand to admit that their country might not be perfect and ‘the best in the world’ and ‘the envy of the world’. To me it’s a sign of very low self-esteem that needs propping up via exaggerated claims about the wonderfulness of the country.
Not so as they managed to do so in South Australia, passing legislation concerning such.
It was under John Bannon’s Labor Government in 1985 when Section 113 of the Electoral Act 1985 (South Australia) was put in place.
It provides for an offence if a person authorises, causes or permits the publication of an electoral advertisement if the advertisement contains a statement purporting to be a statement of fact that is inaccurate and misleading to a material extent.
In 1997, Section 113 was amended to empower the Electoral Commissioner to act on complaints of misleading electoral advertisements, which can be submitted by anyone to the Electoral Commission of South Australia (‘ECSA’).
Since those Liberal claims are so blatantly dishonest, I’m assuming that they must have been a collaboration between Morrison and Taylor.
There are lies,damn lies and Scomos Facts ( Bxll Shxt)
Bull Shxt
Smirko and His Brethren are following in the tradition of the Early Christian Church wherein those Fathers of the Church, Eusebius, Clement , Jerome, John Chrysostom, had no compunction concerning mendacity and were all adept at justifying such deceit for the good of the poor sinner.
Smirko et al. obviously believe in such, as it will set the people of Australia on the path of righteousness of the Lying Nasty Party.
As John Chrysostom, he of the Golden Mouth, given the name as he was so eloquent in his preaching. is also credited in leading the mob which carried out the second and final destruction of the Temple of Artemis, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World…
“…For great is the value of deceit, provided it be not introduced with a mischievous intention. In fact action of this kind ought not to be called deceit, but rather a kind of good management, cleverness and skill, capable of finding out ways where resources fail, and making up for the defects of the mind … “
“…And often it is necessary to deceive, and to do the greatest benefits by means of this device, whereas he who has gone by a straight course has done great mischief to the person whom he has not deceived…”
Chrysostom, Treatise On The Priesthood, Book 1.
So when we think of Spin Doctors let us recall those early ones they who set the standard, The Doctors of the Church
Lying Bastxxds
Biblically speaking also Whited Sepulchres. as their Jesus would have had it!
Mathew 23:27 KJV
If Jesus came back today our PM would be out with the Money Lenders
If you are alluding to overturning the tables in the forecourt of the temple, they were not money lenders as so many constantly miscontrue.
They were money changers – ie they would take the real gelt in exchange give worshippers the required small animals for sacrifice (usually doves) or tokens to lay before the altar.
The latter reminds one of the current Temples to Mammon in most of our capital cities, casinos where one cannot wager using real money – it must be surrendered to the cashier in exchange for plastic tokens which is surely a perfect analogy for the worth of the entire scam.
May have been money changers there but I bet there were a few loan sharks present even 2000 years ago .
If so, they would not have been Jews and so it is would be odd to find them doing business in the Temple. Jews are forbidden from usury with other Jews, the Torah is explicit about it.
Seems clear –
Exodus 22:25 – you must not act as a creditor to him; you are not to charge him interest.
Leviticus 25:37 – You must not lend him your silver at interest or sell him your food for profit.
Deuteronomy 23:19 – Do not charge your brother interest on money, food, or any other type of loan.
As always there is an out on Deuteronomy 23:20 – You may charge a foreigner interest, but not your brother.
By definition, those coming to the Temple would be Jewish aka brothers.
And very useful for money laundering the proceeds of crime.
Wow! Interesting reading! Do you think Morrison has read this treatise?